According To Erchul & Martens (2012), The Earliest Consultation

In his view, maladaptive behavior and psychological disturbance arise because caregivers, family, friends, and community groups within a social system to do not provide sufficient direction, support and stability when an individual is faced with a stressful life event. He believed that mental health consultation is a service to many different professionals to assist them in dealing with the psychological aspects of a current work problem, and, to deal more effectively with similar problems in the future.

Counselling really took off after the Second World War, in 1950’s America. Most of the therapies we hear about today can trace their origins back to a handful of psychologists and psychiatrists who developed techniques and theories, sometimes referred

Laing, who examined the existential aspect of symptom’s characteristic; and Michel Foucault, who explored the social and political factors of the institutionalization of those with mental illness. Mental illness, to these academics, was “a social construction used to label socially intolerable behavior” thereby branding it as individual flaws. Such claims from academic figures such as Szasz, Laing, and Foucault led to an anti-psychiatry movement that was highly critical of the psychiatric authority. Psychiatry and psychology at the time was argued to “enforce power relations rather than [treat] actual clinical conditions” which mirrored Szasz’s ideas on the political agenda behind psychology and

The period of Enlightenment changed how scientists, philosophers, and society looked at the world. Psychiatry faced this new enlightened look, and moral treatment came out of it. According to Dr. James W Trent of Gordon College, before moral treatment people with psychiatric conditions were referred to as insane, and treated inhumanly (Link 1). Philippe Pinel of France at Bicetre hospital in Paris, advocated for moral treatment of the mentally ill (Link 1). In place of physical abuse, Pinel called for kindness and patience, which included recreation, walks, and pleasant conversation (Link 1). Pinel made this change out of reading, observation and reflection; rather then, a result of accident or experiment (Link 2).

Dr. Szasz’s point in this video is about coercive-forced- treatment of psychologically sick people and stigmatization. He makes point that it’s a social idea to categorize people's behavior if they don't fit in to the expected standards, and then put them on medication to change them. There is lots of people who behave different than others and their behaviors might be disturbing in the society but I feel like they need to be able to decide if they want to take the medication or not because medications gave side effects. Psychiatric medications just slow patients down, it’s like they take the control of the body by numbing the brain. When my daughter was in kindergarten she had a classmate who was a little active boy. I was volunteering in

The consultant and the consultee must have the necessary credentials, qualifications, experience, and competence to provide consultation/clinical services. It is expected that both the consultant and the consultee remain ethical, make appropriate recommendations, and oversees the well-being of the consultee/client system. It is

The consequence of medicalization is that ‘deviant behaviours’ which have now become labeled as ‘diseases’ become seen as a straightforward physical event that can be cured with the help of a medical professional. It generalizes these ‘diseases’ making them biological and removing the social aspects of the ‘disease’. Medicine originally was developed to deal with the individual’s body and the biology of disease. Medicine established itself as a science, and over the years a shift occurred. It began to include not only the individual's physical body but also psychological, social and other aspects of the individual. This shift can also be seen

“Why is the initial consultation so important? What factors will an ethical therapist cover at this time?

The United States has never had an official federal-centered approach for mental health care facilities, entrusting its responsibility to the states throughout the history. The earliest initiatives in this field took place in the 18th century, when Virginia built its first asylum and Pennsylvania Hospital reserved its basement to house individuals with mental disorders (Sundararaman, 2009). During the 19th century, other services were built, but their overall lack of quality was alarming. Even then, researchers and professionals in the mental health field attempted to implement the principles of the so-called public health, focusing on prevention and early intervention, but the funds were in the hands of the local governments, which prevented significant advances in this direction.

A Comparison of Two Therapeutic Approaches to Mental Disorders The essence of the medical model is the view that abnormal behaviours like mental disorders result from physical problems and should be treated medically, in other words; mental disorders resemble physical diseases, in that they are both illness of the body. As a result, the medical approach would argue that mental illness and therapeutic action should be taken from the medical perspective. Whereas the psychodynamic approach concerning mental illness put forward by Freud was based partly on his psychosexual development theory.

These counselors will bring with them modernistic, innovative and enhanced treatments, as well as methods, which are designed to guide patients toward living in a much more holistic way, thus allowing the achievement of a mentally healthier life. However, I agree with Bradley T. Erford when he asked, “How can we expect the public to understand who counselors are and what counselors do when we do not even agree on what to call ourselves?” (Shallcross, 2012). Erford goes on to discuss how counseling is global; the government recognizes the need for counselors; and how the needs are increasing both socially and economically. Therefore, if we continue to show the lack of unification in the counseling profession, we are opening the proverbial doors for the possibility of mental health counselors being phased out in the near

These mental health consultants need a lot of knowledge and understanding in the infant and early childhood mental health and the different services as well as the concepts through the different cultures and religions. Every child is different and their families too. They may not be able to do certain things because their religion and believes do not allow it. An example is the family not eating meat, chicken or fish. The center hast to respect that and offer the child and family and alternative food for that child. They need a lot of education on these subject areas. They

The connotation of psychology has evolved historically. However, within some cultures the word psychology and its subsidiary mental health, carry the dark undercurrent of the historical practices of trephining and exorcism. Such perception attributes to the stigma of mental health and its perceived embodiment of an unhinged individual. This particular mindset propels me to research the contributing elements involved in this dilemma. There is no greater feeling than the enlightenment one reaches at the end of a research study. Whether the hypothesis was supported or rejected the results, still reflect an attempt. The attempt drives psychologists and when the attempt reveals its results, we add or subtract a new piece to the

In our western society, the clinical treatment of any psychological unease has become socially acceptable, and even a social norm. It is a notable by-product of the modern-day medicalisation of the mind, which implies that these “mental” problems are akin and juxtapose to physical disorders. The current field of psychiatry operates primarily on conjecture and anecdotal experience, which troubles the clinical boundaries of medical ethics. Consequently, in terms of administering treatment, the philosophical and ethical dialogue of what distinguishes a mental disorder from a somatic one has plagued physicians for decades. Since the medicalisation of these disorders quickly loses traction if it is not done in reference to a normative social context. This dialogue also exposes some social and diagnostic dilemmas in the social understanding of human psychology. To explore these issues, I will discuss the theoretical complexities of locating a definitive category of mental distress, by looking at where it overlaps with somatic conditions. Additionally, I will examine the social inferences of labeling certain psychological states as “disordered”, or as “illnesses”.

Chapter 8 titled, The treatment of people with mental health problems, focuses on the treatment of people with mental health problems; particularly this chapter examines the ways in which the treatment of people with mental health problems might be understood. Specifically the two essences of "treatment" are investigated one identified with specialized parts of treatment, the other to do with the path in which individuals are dealt with as a feature of an ethical request. This chapter looks at how patients are treated by the psychiatric service. The sociological discourse about this subject has tended, itself, to be partitioned between the shafts of the range of administration conveyance, as previously mentioned. On one hand, it has been concerned with basically uncovering treatment as perplexed coercive social control. Then again, it has ended up distracted with those mental mediations which are readily sought and gratefully given.