Adnan Syed Case Summary

In any sort of legal situation, telling the truth and only the truth is extremely important. However, for Jay Wilds, the main witness in the murder of Hae Lee, it seems that the truth was the only thing he refused to tell. For example, in Jay’s story, he tells of a very memorable “trunk pop” location. This is where Jay claims that Adnan opened the trunk of Hae’s car, showing off Hae “pretzeled up.” In one interview, Jay claimed he saw the body in front of his grandmother’s house. However, Jay said in a different interview that he saw the body in front of Best Buy. These two statements are hugely contradictory. Seeing a corpse of a friend must be an event permanently engraved in one’s mind. Yet, for some reason, Jay blatantly changed the location the trunk pop happened. That is a fairly large red flag in the case, being that Jay should remember where he was when he saw the corpse of a friend.

We believe that Jay is guilty. In the next five minutes we will prove to you that Adnan is in fact innocent and why Jay should be in jail. Adnan was close friends with Jay’s girlfriend Stephanie which is what we believe Jay’s motive was to murder Hae. The court convicted Adnan of the murder with the motive of being jealous of Hae’s new relationship. We argue that the motive of jealousy was what made Jay kill Hae Min Lee.

or something. And I sat down next to him. We starting chatting,” by Asia Mclean. This piece of evidence gives Adnan an abili to where he was after school and it causes us to believe that he couldn’t have killed Hae. The final piece of evidence Adnan and how he was during the

Every time Jay was asked to give his testimony his story changed and he never really had an exact story of what happened that day or why Adnan would have killed Hae Min Lee. In the trial testimony Jay was asked why Adnan killed Hae and he said, "because Hae made him mad." In Jay's second testimony he responded to the same question with a different reason "because Hae had broken his heart."

that he had to get surgery and was hospitalized for five days. After that he decided to claim a lawsuit against the school district. His winning of the case send a message to schools everywhere about how LGBTQ bullying cannot be ignored.

Jay's testimony being everything that the State has on Adnan Syed, which, is a testimony

It is said that school ended at 2:15pm and that Hae was dead and in the trunk of her own car and at Best Buy by 2:36pm. Sarah and her producer rerouted the path from the school to Best Buy and said that it would be impossible to get from the school to Best Buy in twenty-one minutes (Ep. 5). There is a lot of traffic that time of day and the drive time is 18 minutes, only leaving 3 minutes to kill and hide the body. That means that 2 minutes of that time would be manual strangulation. It takes more than one minute to hide a body, therefore Adnan could not have committed the murder. A final piece of evidence in Adnan’s favor is that one of Hae’s friends remembers having a conversation with her at 2:36, and another friend remembers seeing Hae in the gym at 3:00 pm (Ep. 9). If these people saw and talked to Hae at these times, then it is impossible to Hae to have been dead, in the trunk of her car, at Best Buy, at 2:36 pm. The timeline does not add up, if this is the

Adnan Syed is a muslim kid who lives under his parents rule and is a troublemaker, but does that make him a murderer? Hae Min Lee seamed to drop off the earth one day in 1999. One month later in Baltimore county, Maryland her body was discovered in a park known for bodies. The story of this case is shocking, but is it true? Did Adnan kill Hae? The jury of this case thinks so; do you? I say he didn’t, but maybe his so called “accomplice” did…

The purpose of this full advice on evidence is to defend client William Hague. The client is on trial for murder under section 302 of the Queensland Criminal Code (henceforth known as QCC). Under section 305 of the QCC the client may be facing life in prison. Queensland’s Supreme Court trial division shall hear the potential case. Persuasive burden of proof is on the prosecution to prove that, beyond a reasonable doubt, the client committed the murder. ‘Beyond a reasonable doubt’ may not be directed, defined or elaborated to the jury. The client possesses an evidential burden to raise any defences beyond a reasonable doubt.

I do need to know more relevant information in regard to useful tools for audit control, theft prevention, reward program, value proposition, etcetera. Certainly, asking at the pump for driver ID # and /or vehicle ID # as well as odometer reading are a normal practice.

Khalid Shaikh Mohammed is believed by American government agencies to be the mastermind behind the September 11 attacks. Not only did he formulate the plan for the September 11 attacks but also many of the terrorist acts that have marred the world since. Mohammed provided the vital link between the nineteen hijackers and Al Qaeda. Yet Mohammed's crucial role was not obvious to American law enforcement officials until several months after the September 11 attacks. Like many other Afghan Arabs, Mohammed was radicalized by the Afghan rebels fighting the Soviet Army. Mohammed only was noticed by the F.B.I. and C.I.A. due to his involvement in a 1995 plot to blow up a dozen American commercial airlines. He was also caught with Ramzi Yousef, leading

There are many people in the adnan syed case. Of course there's Adnan, Hae Min Lee murder victim, Jay and a bunch of friends of Hae and Adnan. Sarah koenig's was the reporter in the case. So does Sarah take one side over the other or is it mutual. Sarah koenig in this case has always been a Adnan's fan she has never taken another side she has always been on adnan's side throughout this whole case.

Another interesting case that will focus more on the interrogational side over the judicial, is the case of Mohammed al-Qahtani who was suspected of being the twentieth hijacker that was meant to partake in the September 11 attacks. Qahtani was captured in Afganistan in 2001 and transferred to Guantanamo bay. Time, had gotten hold of Qahtani’s detainee interrogational log that revealed the interrogational methods used in his case along with every one of his daily activities that were recorded every few minutes. The interrogational methods used included isolation, nudity, exposure to loud noise, sleep deprivation, the use of female interrogators and pictures of insufficiently dressed women. Evidently, Qahtani was able to resist the interrogations,

What is true justice? It can be summed up as being morally appropriate, justifiable, and most importantly fair. In Omar Khadr’s prosecution, it seemed like justice was nonexistent. Many aspects of this case were not taken into consideration and were also disregarded, such as the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the U.N. Convention of Rights of the Child, the Canadian Constitution, International Law and the Geneva Convention. Despite the fact that there are so many laws opposing such inhumane treatment of human beings, Canada allowed this injustice to happen to Omar, which is absolutely illogical. Omar’s case showed just how broken and corrupted Canada’s justice system is along with the U.S. justice system, and how Omar’s great suffering was

particular prosecutor was not invested enough in his work to properly work this case. He