Adoption As Human Beings Caring For Non Human Primates

1491 Words6 Pages
ANTH 301 – Adoption – Research Paper The textbook explains adoption as human beings caring for non-human primates. In an article from the California State University, Fullerton library in the Anthropology department, an Anthropology researcher, Stein writes “about behavioral definitions of adoption are scarce.” (Stein) The concept of “change of primary caregiver” is central in adoption, but as will be seen, adoptors are often individuals other than adult females. Also, measuring attachment can prove difficult, especially in the field. Anthropology researcher Riedman defines a foster parent as one who “provides exclusive care for another 's offspring.” (Riedman) This also appears over-restrictive, for many cases of adoption in nonhuman…show more content…
Typically feed in the morning on high energy foods and decreases in the afternoon. Activity varies depending on main dietary component Frugivores spend more time foraging than folivores, which in turn increase energetic expenditure During times of scarcity, folivores increase the amount of time spent resting to digest mature leaves Some frugivores increase activity to find alternate food choices Ranging Patterns Overall frugivores have greater home ranges and daily path lengths than folivores. As the percent of foliage increases the time spent traveling decreases. Over lapping ranges may lead to competition between groups, especially when population density is high. Time and energy should be spent defending high quality food. Food Choice Increase in preferred, high quality foods during the wet season. Primates have a greater dietary breadth during the dry season. Consume more subsistence, although usually lower quality, foods during the dry season Grouping Patterns Large groups can monopolize resources better Monopolizing high quality food should increase female reproductive rate Females should have higher fertility Males should have access to more females with better fertility than males in smaller groups; therefore, increasing his reproductive success Less cohesive female grouping Greater benefit to forage on own – rather than defending a food patch and then not acquiring any food Maintaining a cohesive grouping
Get Access