If free college is too difficult to get passed in the US, a system like Australia's that gets a lot of the way there should still be of benefit. In Australia students still have to pay for their course, but they can automatically opt to borrow the money required from the government at an interest rate equal to the Consumer Price Index and they only have to pay it back if their income becomes higher than the national average. This system still amounts to a very large subsidy for tertiary education, but maybe it would be politically easier to put in place than free
To let in some light about the topic; Average debt in the US is at very high rates. “Studies show that there is no better short-term or long-term investment for the rest of society than higher education” (Page). College is expensive, let's make it more affordable. “This topic Deserves an open mind and a balanced exploration of the potential benefits, drawbacks, and alternatives” (“Should”). No matter the topic there is drawbacks. With free tuition there are not many to talk about. “As of the 2013-2014 school year, the countries with tuition-free public higher education included: Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Norway, The Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Turkey and Germany. Free college, in Europe especially has proven to be a popular idea” (“Should”). Other major countries are successfully improving with free college tuition. US students want to add America to that list.
According to dissent magazine, Bruenig (2015 ) states “ The main problem with free college is that most students come from disproportionately well-off backgrounds and already enjoy disproportionately well-off futures, which makes them relatively uncompelling targets for public transfers” with that being stated . I feel like no one should get a free handout especially those who are of the well-off status. Why should they get everything so easy? Make them work for it. By making tuition free you would just basically be handing them a degree without having to work hard for it. when there is money at hand, (tuition) college is taken seriously.
Federal reserve estimates that student debt is an outstanding $1.225 trillion in the U.S. alone, and the cost rising $100 billion every year. Making college education free would reduce these costs. The biggest reason as to why students drop out is due to tuition costs. This is my case. It’s estimated that if every 18-24 year old were enrolled into a college, the unemployment rate would drop by 2 million. Jeff Bryant of the Education Opportunity Network states that free college education is not a fantasy, and if universities were made public, the cost would be roughly $62.6 billion, with the government already spending $69 billion a year on student
Should colleges be free in America? It is a question that is more relevant today than ever before. As education is one key factor that determines the nation’s fate going forward, this question is worth debating. Making free college education may sound good theoretically but requires herculean efforts to make it practically possible. The main question is whether such program be effective in the long run or not? If, yes how long will the government able to support these costs and from where? Are tuition costs only the concern that discourages students from attending colleges? There may arise several skepticisms that can withhold the idea of free colleges. As both colleges and students won’t be benefitted by such plans the college education should not be free.
For parents and students, free college sounds like a dream come true. Free college is not a new idea, but, with higher education costs and students debt dominating public perception, it is one that appeals to more and more people. The national debate about free, public higher education is long ago and. Last year, Germany eliminated tuition because they believed that free college works. Germany used to charge student $1,300 per year, which was later found discouraged the Germans from going to college. Norway, Sweden, Finland, France, Argentina, Egypt, Spain and many other countries around the globe also offer free college to all of their citizens and foreigners too. Next year, Chile will do the same. If other countries can make free college, so can the
I personally don't think that college should be free. Students who pay for their college are more motivated, hard working and independent. Many students would have poor motivation to finish school, because they can always come back. As a matter of fact students with ambitions to get university degree are learning much harder in high school than other, who thinks they don’t need an extra paper. There are many students that are so smart, and they will find the way to get money for school. With extra work and help from family students will be able to afford college tuitions. Students need to depend on themselves; otherwise every taxpayer will have to cover their education expenses. There are several reasons why
One of the problems for free college nationwide is that taxes will rise exponentially. This is best stated in an article in by Martin Bozeman (The Odyssey) “For four short years, you may enjoy a free education at a university of your choice, but you have to remember what happens after you graduate. You get a job, and more importantly, you pay
Another critical reason why colleges should be free is to help lower the student dropout rate. 70% of Americans will study at a 4-year college, but less than 2/3 will graduate. College is so expensive many are forced to take out loans which result in them not being able to pay them, and lastly dropping out. It is a fact that college cost has risen over 350 percent in the last twenty-five years. I find it completely unfair how when someone finally graduates college they must firstly go pay off their financial loans. What the point in even studying when half the money you make is going back into college. There are people who take about ten years or more to pay off college loans. Not only is this stressful for many, but it takes away the incentive
As it is said that,”Nothing is free in life” it also remains true with college tuition, one of the biggest argument against a free college is the fact that the 6000$ per year fee for college would just be turned into taxes and now instead of just those few who want to get post-secondary study everyone will have to pay for it. Unfortunately that is true and the rise in taxes would be tremendous increase. But again neither is FREE healthcare free and everyone seems to be liking it even though an average person only makes about 7 visits to doctor per year.Another common argument against free college is that it would be just like high school where students just don't care about studies or their grades but thousands of students throughout Alberta would be glad that they don't have to pay around 20,000$ for a college degree.
America providing free college tuition would allow our country to reach new heights and cross new barriers. Tuition should be free for all students because our nation could become more successful, eliminate social class distinctions, cause a great economic boom, and also it works great for other countries so why not us?
The United States was ranked 4th in the highest average cost of tuition, but we are only ranked 12th in the world in four-year degrees. This means that the productivity of the students in the states does not match the cost of their education. Additionally, the average rest of the world tuition coverage is 70% of college fees while the US government only covers 38% of college fees. Not only does a free education system help improve the economy, but it also grants students equality in their chances of being accepted. To elaborate, if everyone did not have to
Free college is a commonly accepted idea, as a crucial part of society's advancement. Education is the foundation for building a strong country, as knowledge is what allows for productivity in all areas of life. However, the cost and accessibility to standard higher education limits many people's availability to a quality schooling. Some may argue that public colleges should continue to charge tuition, as the federal government can not afford the cost nor will creating higher taxes to enable the program solve the crisis. However, ultimately, higher education should be free as it would stimulate economic growth, remove the primary deterrent for not attending college and decrease dependence on government aid.
Another issue that would arise with higher education being free would be that the job market could have a higher supply educated workers in some fields than their demand. If college is free to the public, then the money has to really come from
Is free college education actually free? While the idea of a free college education sounds enticing, can the model actually work in the United States? Though attending university or college can, in most cases, set a person up for a successful future, not everyone can afford to continue their education past high school. Students contemplate not attending university due to the stress of college debt or inability to pay. This, in turn, causes some politicians to introduce the controversial topic of free education. With free education, college students could come out of university with little to no debt, making their lives after college much less stressful. Higher education should not leave students tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt. This means getting the Department of Education involved so more students can attend college and the Department can achieve its mission of educational excellence.
College, in our everyday world, is considered to be something that uplifts or elevates a person's opportunity in life and is widely regarded as a huge reward on completion. However, is taking away some of the risk in this achievement, the correct thing to do? Changing an integral part of American society, such as college, could have many life changing and societal negative effects and is overall not worth it. College should not be free the first two years due to a necessity to raise taxes to accommodate the "free college", academic and educational quality being hindered due to more teachers being needed, and apathy among students if college became risk free.