Alice Marwick And Danah Boyd: Article Analysis

Privacy has become a prominent topic in academic and social debate throughout the country. In “Term of Service” by Jacob Silverman, Silverman argues that American citizens today are unaware that their private information is often shown and are no longer safe from the public eye. After all, the integration of social media such as Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, and Twitter has made it impossible to keep anything private. Sharing life events on social media has become the new social norm in the United States. However, this new trend has left the online community with a false sense of security, leaving them venerable against data mining, profiling, and unknown surveillance issues by third party miners across the country. With no end to this threat, how can causal social media users defend themselves without any assistants? The federal government should adopt stronger privacy laws like they have in Europe. They should come up with a digital bill of reforms to help better protect the online community, better inform the public about data mining threats, and companies should get government approval for any data retrieval before they are used for financial gains.

"We collect the content and other information you provide when you use our Services, including when you sign up for an account, create or share, and message or communicate with others” (Hachman). Each day people live with a false security that they are protected and maintain a sense of privacy. Citizens misplace their trust in social media and technology, and divulge their personal information in ignorance of the repercussions that may arise. Users say the advances in technology and social media will not affect their privacy; however, it is proven that these advances can be a harbinger of both danger and discontent.

We are successfully utilizing social media as a powerful way to gain positive exposure and connect with our internet-savvy customers in a global and local level. We rely heavily in word-of-mouth advocacy”. (John Mackey, 2012)

Daniel Solove, a professor who specializes in internet privacy law, wrote this book to give his personal take on how the internet was transforming the way people connect through social mediums and how that could change in the future. An important thing to note about this book is that it was published in 2007, so some of the social and technological aspects of the book are slightly dated. Regardless of this though, this book provides an inquisitive perspective on the dynamic nature of the internet as a vessel of our society’s changing norms on privacy in the social sphere. Many of our learning points in class relate to topics discussed in this book and help to strengthen the context and significance of the underlying message.

Acquisti and Gross point out that the unprecedented growth of online social networks including but not limited to Facebook and MySpace has brought with itself serious security and privacy concerns. In this particular study, the authors found out that privacy issues do not discourage individuals from being members of the network. Further, the authors also found out that even individuals who happen to be rather concerned about their privacy reveal a great deal of their personal information after joining the network. This study is highly relevant to my research as it clearly demonstrates that individuals do not take privacy issues seriously on joining Facebook. As the authors point out, the study in this case secured its support from the "CMU Berkman Faculty Development Fund, CMU CyLab and the Data Privacy Laboratory." Thus in addition to being relevant, the study can also be regarded credible.

The rise of social media has been a global phenomenon since internet giant Facebook began, with one in seven people having a Facebook account (Hennig-Thurau, Hofacker & Bloching 2013). This has had an impact on the marketing environment in several ways, with the two most notable being increased active participation and a strong level of networked interconnectedness (Hennig-Thurau, Hofacker & Bloching 2013). These two changes have shifted the power from the marketer to the consumer, as the regular consumer now has access to vast amounts of information and has the ability to amplify their opinion globally (Labrecque et al. 2013). For this reason, it may be argued that in the 21st century, marketing occurs among consumers, and is no longer purely

Social Media is a current way in which people are using to interact with one another daily. Since the launch of various Social Networking Sites (SNS) its been a huge attraction in a new way to share information with others and correspond with interests of your choice in many different forms. Although social media sites allow users to share information with friends and other sites on the internet, many people are unaware of how their privacy is getting out. Now that the expansion of global connection through these social media networking sites are so highly present in todays society, giving us easy access to information, the lack of one's privacy is being diminished. Everyday peoples privacy rights are

However, Abram’s call for individual’s responsibility of privacy by limiting access to certain information is impossible due to the very nature of social media. In Alice E Marwick and danah boyd’s 2014 article, Networked Privacy: How Teenagers Negotiate Context in Social Media, they argue that because social media is, as previously discussed by Werbin and Fuchs, a networked environment that thrives on sharing user-generated data (Marwick & boyd 1054). Furthermore, Marwick and boyd explain this argument through a paraphrased statement from new media studies scholar Jenny Sunden (2003), which states, “to exist online, people must type themselves into being” (Marwick & boyd 1054). In other words, each “like”, post, and comment all contribute to our existence online; to use social media we must put ourselves and our information online. Moreover, rather than focusing on Abram’s individual responsibility model – which Marwick & boyd call “access-control list” –, Marwick & boyd suggest that their “networked privacy” model – where privacy becomes the responsibility of each member of the social media network – fits our social media platforms better (1064-1065). In other words, through their study of how American teenagers manage privacy online, Marwick & boyd conclude that it is incredibly difficult to maintain privacy on social media, because one shared photo to a few friends on Facebook means the responsibility to keep this information private transfers to these friends (1064). To

Attacks of the Customers by Paul Gillin and co-author Greg Gianforte is a great book for anyone involved in the crafting of social media strategy or customer engagement. The book looks at the power that consumers have in a social media-enabled world and how organizations can cope with this new trend. Paul introduces a set of strategies that go beyond a traditional crisis communications program by showcasing many different examples of the consumers’ attacks in the digital age.

Privacy is an interesting topic to understand in the age of new media. It seems everyone wants privacy, yet we still share our life stories with the world on social media platforms. Throughout this research paper I will discuss what privacy is, what we want to keep private, and the purpose of privacy, laws that protect our privacy and how privacy affects us on the Internet. Furthermore, I will look at the case of Ashley Madison, an online dating site for those already married and how personal information was leaked about its users.

Derek Powazek, a published author and pioneer of the Internet, once claimed that “If you're not paying for the product, you are the product”. With social media sites like Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter having an estimate of 2.3 billion active users, the statement remains true today, seen through the rise of social networking sites monetizing user information and turning this to big data. The application of these available statistics allow for various trends to pick up so easily and quickly in the consumer culture. In a world where social networking sites dominate the market, tons of channels emerge as tools for advertisers to capitalize on an individual’s social clout and circle. The invention of this technology has changed the landscape

As we navigate our reading this week as few thing stood out to me as it related to the weekly question. In taking a true inventory of how an organization is performing with the avenues of social media they choose I find that our text spelled out some substantial aspects or elements that appear as relevant as any others. In the text Levinson, Forbes, Frank (2010) “Believable. Does what you offer sound plausible to the people in the segment?” (Pg. 216) This speaks to if a “customer” or contact on social media values the aspect that you are credible or competent in what you are presenting. This precept is very large when it comes to finding the affectedness of your social media. It seems to be quite simple to use social media and quite difficult

Thank you for the comprehensive post. I have gained valuable insights going through your arguments and assertions. The business today is a global village thanks to rapid technological, communication, and transportation advancements. Organizations need to adopt and adapt to such changes if they are to become successful. The advent of social media, in particular, has provided an enabling environment that marketers can use to reach even more people. However, a bad social media presence may even be worse than none at all. Hence, as companies rush to market themselves and their products through social media, it is important to ensure

Researchers Jennings, Blount and Weatherly (2014) correlate social media to an online pandora’s box”. “Bountiful riches” have been discovered from the use of social media but like pandora’s box, “a firestorm of unforeseen consequences” can come to light (Jennings et al, 2014, p. 96). As thousands can access a plethora of valuable information from social media, on the other hand, stalkers can collect a magnitude of personal data and whereabouts of people at any given moment. Companies and their employers are responsible for what their employees make public on social media. With that, corporations need to emphasize the need to protect the leakage of the firm’s privacy (Khan et al, 2014, p. 612). Most Social media applications will not grant an individual access to their website without supplying one’s identity by generating a profile. Privacy becomes a big issue with social media because one’s pictures, comments, videos, location, and profile are no longer private once they are published online. Lurkers can simply google one’s name and easily find pictures along with identifiable information. Government employees are warned against posting personally identifiable information, such as birthdays, address, profession, location and place of birth due to threats against America (Khan et al, 2014, p. 613). Likewise, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) prohibits doctors and nurses from disclosing any

One of the most powerful tools in todays world is right under our fingertips. Social media, ranging from several platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram or even LinkedIn, has had more of an effect than we may realize. Social media brings many things to our attention that we have certain opinions or hold positions on. With the transparency it allows between company and customer, the people have a platform to voice their opinion on. Social media gives you certain opportunities with certain limits. In this paper, I am arguing that as consumers we do have choices to make changes and we can do this especially through social media but there are limits to how much we can do. Social media has provided an avenue by which we can enter the arena and make social change but there is a limit to that. There are many forms of media including video that are able to provide very useful information in a. To fully grasp the big picture of the effect of social media on the culture of capitalism, one must be exposed to the different aspects behind this process.