Houhua chen
M Butler
English 95
08/02/2015
Altruism and Community Service
Altruism is generally understood as performing an act that benefits others at a personal cost. This means that altruism involves sacrifice. Altruism, however, is not only a physical act, but an emotional undertaking. An emotional undertaking means that altruism is a state of being. Altruism draws intense philosophical, psychological, and socio-political arguments. In as much as most people prefer the benefits that altruism grants to the society, they are wary of its moral foundations. Notably, most famous people in history have essentially performed given altruistic acts that benefitted their societies. It is arguable that altruism provides significant benefits both
…show more content…
At one point in history, certain people resolved to perform acts that benefitted their societies. Altruism, thus, is at the core of every revolutionary activity that has occurred in the world. Social revolution is impossible if there is no one willing to make the sacrifice of calling for change. In as much as a revolutionary activity calls for community mobilization, a few people should always possess the courage not only to identify certain wrongdoings, but also initiate the change process. For instance, in the civil rights movement, most blacks faced oppression but felt disempowered to call for change. This meant the blacks would experience oppression for a long time before realizing that unless they were able to make particular sacrifices, they would continue suffering in the future. People such as Martin Luther King started awareness efforts, and initiated programs that would lead towards the recognition of the black Americans’ rights. Without their initiative to go public about the needs of black people in the US, the changes experienced now would have taken a much longer time. Besides, it has been shown that altruism helps defend certain human entitlements. A person, who participates towards ensuring a crime-free community, believes that people have an entitlement towards an anxiety-free …show more content…
Research has shown that certain altruistic acts emanate from personal defects (McCullough, Kimeldorf, & Cohen 283). An individual who cannot attain satisfaction at the individual level, thus, lives one’s life at the societal level (Seelig & Dobelle 4). The act of empathizing and helping someone usually shows humanity at its ultimate level. It provides the distinction between human beings and other animals that merely live on their instincts. Altruism involves a sense of growth and nurture to the person who commits the act. This correlates with the studies that proved that the mere act of parenting accords satisfaction to the parent. A person who extends one’s energies into other people’s lives enjoys the platform of watching something other than oneself
Humans are prenatally motivated to help those around us due to its evolutionary benefits that our species has a better chance of survival if all cooperate. Humans can also be nurtured to exhibit altruistic behavior through good parenting. Although most of the population agrees that altruism benefits society, scientific research has shown that even those who believe they are altruistic are not when they are put in situations which calls for selfless behavior. One phenomena that refutes the claim that most of the population strives for selfless behavior is known as the bystander effect. The bystander effect is when a person feels less responsible for doing selfless acts when they are in an environment of a group of
Altruism, despite the fact that a human conduct, needs extraordinary expressions to convey what needs be on all levels of unselfishness, for example, love and regard, since benevolence is regularly mistaken for any benevolent conduct made by living animals, and we should not utilize this general term to depict specific practices and behaviours.
Altruism is a concept in which the individual sacrifices regard for themselves in the interest of another. The ethics of altruism state that a person should act in a matter where their self-sacrifice yields the greater well being on the whole. To put that statement in the form of a fundamental principle of rightness, an action is right if and only if (and because) the action brings a net-gain of well being to anyone except the individual performing the action. The altruistic mentality of an individual according to this moral theory means that any action that they undertake should be in the interest of others rather than themselves. The ethics of this concept also state that relationships of greater value to the individual carrying out an action should come second in priority to those they have with strangers since the close relationship has a much more meaningful connection to a person’s life. In these situations, the only morally correct way of acting is in the way that defeats the well being of the agent of an action for the sake of others.
Bartel (1976) defines prosocial behaviour as ‘behaviour that intentionally helps or benefits another person’. Batson (1987) defines altruism as ‘helping another person for no reward, and even at some cost to oneself.’ This definition of altruism seemingly depicts the behaviour as selfless, however there is a wealth of research which suggests that this is not the case.
Another example of how altruism can be viewed in today’s society can be seen in the works of Mother Teresa and her plethora of altruistic acts throughout the globe. Although her focus was in India where she persued her novitiate (training), her organization has opened over 500 centers around the world helping the dying and the destitute (Moore 2002, pg. x). She took in the “untouchables” of society and gave them care and made sure that they were comfortable. Mother Teresa is often used as the benchmark when determining whether a selfless act is truly altruistic.
Altruism: “Devotion to the welfare of others, regard for others, as a principle of action; opposed to egoism or selfishness” (Britannica Online, 2008). Altruism is taking care of
Altruism, also known as selflessness, is one of the most puzzling topics in the public domain today. The main issue from the perspective of many scholars is how altruism can be effective. Even though many people get involved in lifelong altruism, only a few of them emerge to be effective in it. What could be the reason behind this? And what makes altruism such a common issue that everyone needs to engage in it? The producer, Peter Singer, puts on important points that give more light on the urgency of the altruism to the younger generation and how to make it effective in the long run.
Altruism is when the actions of a person promote the best consequences for others, yet do not benefit the person who performed the act. Abruzzi and McGandy (2006) explain that Auguste Comte developed the term to support his ethical stance that humans are morally obliged to serve the interests of others,
Altruism refers to the concern for the welfare and well being of others without personal gains or
Altruism, in which one selflessly devotes to the welfare of another without expecting anything in return, often elicits an inexplicable and intangible surge of joy, in which one gains a sense of purpose. For example, I have observed the therapists at PRANA, whom altruistically devote up to an hour, when initially only allotted a half-hour time slot, programming individualized treatments for each patient. In their hour- long treatments, they create a non-fraternizing relationship with their patients that is fully functional on trust, empathy, and generosity. Devoting that extra time to each patient gives not only the
Singer examines and dismisses the various views of philosophers throughout history saying that people are only motivated to be altruistic when it is self-rewarding.
Random acts of kindness, altruistic and prosocial behavior can elaborate to being a hero. An elderly lady is standing in a grocery line fumbling through her bag to find the change needed to complete her transaction, yet she ends up empty handed. A young man behind here hesitates to ask if he could be of assistance, yet the heroic behavior would be to give her the amount needed to complete the transaction, a prosocial behavior. Prosocial behavior is any act performed with the goals of benefiting another person (Aronson, Wilson, & Akert, 2010). This comparison matrix paper will show the differences and similarities of the authors by comparing their introductions, the purpose of each study, their research questions, the literature reviews, the sample population, study limitations, results and conclusions, and suggested topics for future studies.
Many have defined altruism in a similar context, a special form of helping behaviour that is “an act that is motivated by the desire to benefit another individual rather than oneself” (Hogg &Vaughan, 2008). An altruistic act does not necessarily have a negative or zero value to the actor (Margolis, 1982) but a true altruistic act is detrimental to the actor's fitness and enhances another individual’s fitness, in other words, a selfless act (Batson, 1991). Throughout the evolution of altruism, there have been many controversies about the existence of true altruism. Most theories have argued that it stems from ulterior motives, but does that prove
First, it is important to understand what altruism is. Altruism is any act carried out by an individual in order to benefit another individual. [1, 2] At first glance,
Altruistic acts are often seen through the benevolent acts of family members express towards each other on a regular basis. Because of the significant amount of genes we share with our kin, the survival of a family is prioritized equally to the survival of the individual. Each member of the family will therefore behave altruistically towards each other, due to the evolutionary drive for survival. The reason that parents behave this altruistically towards their offspring is because “parents (adults) are in a maximally favorable position to dispense inexpensive aid to offspring (eggs) that maximally resembles the parents genetically” (Alexander, 462). Even through altruism is perhaps highest between family members, people also feel more empathetic towards others who possess similar traits, as a large number of genes are share. As altruism “involves a loss of individual fitness, [it] can evolve only by group selection” (Nunney, 228). Therefore, we can see that nature’s force of the survival of the group is a primary driving factor for the appearance of altruism.