An observational study design that could be appropriately used by an APN to study the above research question is a cross sectional study design. Important questions to make this study applicable, is it appropriate; is the characteristics between prevalent and incident cases a factor; have other explanations been ruled out?
According to Curley & Vitale (2012), the cross-sectional study determines the exposure and outcomes at the same time. It provides a “snap shot” at one point in time. The information obtained was about the relationship of Tuberculosis and the White Ethnic group of males during a single point in time, 1993 and 2011. Cross sectional studies are applicable for screening the hypothesis due to the fact they require a small time frame and minimal resources to manag e.
Cross sectional study design has been utilized to comprehend the prevalence of diseases, treatments, services and outcomes. Cross-sectional study strengths contain surveys that are inexpensive and takes a shorter time to complete, and can provide descriptive data about the population of people involved in the study. The study can be useful for assessing risk factor prevalence rate, a means to compare groups, has the ability to study fatal diseases within a smaller population, and can study multiple exposures (Curley & Vitale, 2012).
Cross-sectional weaknesses are unable to measure or determine exposures exactly because the outcome and exposure is done simultaneously. There can be bias of variable
When a question has been identified the best study design can be chosen. For a prognosis question, a good quality cohort study would be used. For a non-compliance question, a qualitative study would be appropriate and for the effectiveness of treatment a systematic
Observational study design examined on the basis of exposure and health outcome. The exposure of interest is the factor that either causes, Prevents, or treats the outcome. It is important to consider whether the exposure was accurately defined and measured because exposure misclassification stems from broad definitions and inaccurate measurements. (Aschengrau & Seage, 2008). According to Munnoch et al. (2008), study conducted to investigate the S.Saintapaul infection
Method: The type of article would be an empirical study. The purpose of the study was to examine
In the study, the between-groups design and the cross-sectional design were used for research. There were 243 participants between the ages of 18 and 39, and the majority were females and Caucasians. The average age was about 21 years old.
What types of epidemiological studies would be most useful to help one gather data, descriptive or analytical studies, and why?
Nurse practitioners are known to provide excellent quality and clinical to our patients. we listen, take time and advocate for our patients. These patients choose Advance Nurse Practitioners because of these strengths. However, health care now is more than taking care of patient with this political realm that controls what Advance Nurse Practitioners can do and how we have to do it. In this Advance Nurse Practitioners practice, the promotion to the public will be by participating and get involved in our communities. According to The American Nurses Association (ANA), Advance Nurse Practitioners play an important and crucial role in the evolution of the healthcare system in the U.S. (American Nurses Association,
2.1: 2.2: 2.3: Sample size in case simulation study Sample size for CREST data analysis Sample size for media reporting and internet study 9 10 12
When looking at individual-based studies, one is looking at a smaller group of individuals and determining if they reach a specific outcome based on being exposed to a risk factor. With this information, an inference is made about the general population to determine if the stated exposure affects their chances on having the expected outcome that is discussed in the study. Since it is not a true representation of the population however, an investigator runs the risk of not having an accurate representation of the data in terms of the general population.
The study design was a cross sectional survey design and was approved by Institutional Review Board of Columbia University Medical Center.
A cross-sectional survey is conducted at a single point in time and analyzes the prevalence of selected topics. However, a longitudinal survey records observations over a
I believe that there are several limits to this study. Within a proper random sample we can use research to generalize the findings to most populations. This research only utilized retrospective and cross-sectional methodology; this constrains the generalizablility of the
Observational epidemiology is a study of disease where “the investigator ascertains exposure and outcome without assignment to an intervention” Observational studies have made important contributions to the knowledge and understanding of health-related conditions. These studies usually involve a large group of individuals as in a community. The purpose of this type of study is to determine the
The drawback to cross-sectional studies is the inability to express cause and effect relationships between the variables being tested. Or to make a convincing observation in regards to the course of the connection between variables.It is because of the concept of the snapshot at the single moment, that prevents the consideration of before and after that specific moment is analyzed (What researchers mean by cross-sectional vs. longitudinal studies.,2009). As it relates to longitudinal studies, they are observational as well. However, it is over an extended period. Like cross-sectional studies, the researchers are not entering with the participants or respondents. This method studies the same subjects several times over a period of years. This technique gives the scholar the ability to measure the change of data to be collected over time. Longitudinal studies come in three prominent types panel, cohort, and retrospective. The panel study is a representative sample of participants, and the retroactive study utilizes historical data that is sometimes compared to improved
Quantitative studies are primarily numbers based. They deal with large cohort groups as well as analyze large amounts of data. “A quantitative
A study design is the procedure that guides a researcher on how to collect, analyze and interpret observations. It is a logical model that guides the investigator while he navigates through the various stages of the research. Study types can be classified severally depending on the research strategy employed. A study type can be non-interventional that is ‘observational’ where a researcher just observes and analyses researchable objects or situations without intervening. Non-interventional study designs can be exploratory, descriptive or comparative. A study can also be