Bryan Magee wrote in his essay; 'Ultimate Questions:' "I have posited nothing outside the ordinary, everyday order of events nothing religious, nothing supernatural, nothing transcendental." Imagine Magee's frustration when a man from the cloth poured piety all over his antiquity fueled philosophy. I felt this injustice, I couldn't stand by.
First of all, my pious intrigue started out at a Christian Cult in 1991, in the South of England. I was fresh and away from homely comforts, hence, open to learn about pro-creative ideologies and to experience them. No thought was to disbelieve whatsoever. Why should I, I trusted my elder's wisdom more than my own and my peers - within two months, I found incongruity. The moon faces weren't as friendly
…show more content…
why it's not here. I'd say that by being locked on a speck of dust for a limited time-period doesn't bode well for getting answers, to be certain that a Superior Being exists, let a alone an omnipotent one - whence, to convey to a 'certainty;' is outlandishly precarious to put it mildly. But for those who are 'absolutely certain,' you're assured that anyone who refutes the idea of divine's hand cannot prove it either... for certain. The bone of contention I have is the mysteries of the cosmos are unexplainable yet the assureness of those who claim the truth is out there do so with 'absolute certainty;' done so without heed or intellectualism. This isn't a harsh critique et al: it's irrational to devote your time and belief-system to flawed doctrinations / prophecies that's known to be tampered with for centuries. I'm genuinely confused why it's intellectually acceptable. The 'believers' (I don't like using this terminology, but I do so because deism is all about divide) who're willing to debate with me have real issues with this; thus, to get discourse going... I attempt to build bridges by adapting to a personal 'journey of discovery,' a mode Evangelists can relate to... plus, it is less offensive for those who mistakenly think I'm attacking their 'personal Jesus,' this is an absurd misconception... it's impossible to vilify or attack the core essence of an entity so it flips over and changes at will through trepidation - funnily enough, reality is not a point-scoring pixilated
Stephen Prothero’s “God Is Not One” is a survey of world religions, comprising vital information on a vast array of different sets of belief. As someone who has never studied religion before, nor belongs to a particular faith, the variability within these religions is staggering. One might be satisfied to define religion as “how a person goes about believing in God,” but soon finds that even that definition has its holes. Thankfully, “God Is Not One” does an amazing job of cluing its reader into the nuances that are sometimes forgotten about the religions it approaches.
Bruilly, E., O'Brien, J., Palmer and Palmer, M. (1997) Religions of the World, Great Britain: Macdonald Young.
Craig Martin is the Assistant Professor of Religious Studies at St. Thomas Aquinas College. He serves upon the North American Association for the Study of Religion, and is the author of five books that primarily deal with the complex relationship between society and religion and the “religious experience”.
Before attending college here at Seattle University, I never necessarily thought that I would be interested in learning about religions other than my own. Throughout my life I was raised to follow the Christian faith. Everything that pertained to my life revolved around my faith. Although I do not regret being born and raised in a Christian home, some occasions have risen where I felt a sense of being “forced” into the religion. This caused myself to ultimately grow a disconnection from my faith. Coming to Seattle University with a sense of disconnection from my religion in actuality provided me the motivation and inspiration to possibly learn about different religions in order to compare and contrast their views from my personal ones, which
the structure of religions I’ve never acknowledged or been aware of. The author, James C.
It is not fair for any religion to dismiss another as absurd, because of the inherent differences in what different religions include or consider “miracles”, “’oracles”, or “rituals”. Opposing religions consider each other ridiculous equally and their own dogma is revered as “true” equally. To Don Talayesva as a child, Christianity was nothing more than something white people talked about while he waited for their free clothing or candy. This is soundly equivalent to the care and consideration non-Hopis’ give to the thought of dancing for rain.
Subsection Summary: Religious skepticism staged a dramatic comeback in the form of a wave of revivalism.
Using proven facts and methodologies, the author supports her argument that various faiths can coexist outside of a singular perspective. Ward acknowledges every faith has defining guidelines followers must embrace, but maintains the
In William James’ 1902 book “The Varieties of Religious Experience” he opens with depicting the approach of his review. He clarifies that it would be of little advantage to construct the examination with respect to regular people who have bound religious encounters and emulate customs which have been passed on to them. Rather, he centers the review around 'religious virtuosos '. In addition, as he clarifies in his second address, the attention must be on individual religious experience instead of corporate, in light of the fact that it is more central. Actually, it is out of the extreme encounters of a little few that most religious developments (or "factions" as he terms them) have created. Part 3 builds up that individuals appear to have the ability to encounter the concealed furthermore an inclination to see it as being more genuine than things seen, listened, touched or tasted.
Relig-ish affirms the fact that, for many people, abandoning one’s faith isn’t a lazy act, but is “a mindful and appropriate response in an expanding world” (5). Mee-Chapman recognizes the diverse spiritual needs of her audience and carefully guides us through the process of creating “a set of right-fit spiritual practices that are rooted in your history, authentic to who you are today, and creative enough to grow with you” (6).
One of the most positive things about being an American is the ability to interact in “the melting pot” of various cultures all around. While most of us obviously identify with our own specific culture, the variety within our society is extremely diverse, allowing intercultural communication and presents a learning experience for those who are able to communicate and with one another. When observing and interacting with cultures other than my own, I am able to identify some similarities, as well as the differences from their culture to mine. Throughout this semester we have learned so many things about different cultures and worldviews, I have begun to learn a lot more about myself and my personal religious views. I have never followed a religious practice on my own choice, but it is encouraging to see how it positively impacts others in my life.
My whole life I have been surrounded by Christianity. I’ve gone to church for as long as I can remember mainly because of my best friends uncle. My best friends uncle is a Pastor at a Methodist church. All of this has influenced me in my decision in determining that Christianity is the Ultimate Reality. The major claim of Christianity is Christ, Son of God, rose from the dead to show his deity and forgive us for our sins.
Saying that some religions got things right, even the older pagan gods, you had the Gods of war, earth, horses, wind, sun and all can be represented in what we see in ourselves. That being said the idea is really honest I can obvisouly see that in Budism they understand there is right in wrong in the unverse and imprace it. For me personally i can get Athism the most as I was one and became a christian even though there are some days I feel Agnostic I have my doubts but each time I look the old me who sceince was the answer and that after being tought that Christianty is simply logicaly right. For being an age old religon that ideas are still sound and make sense and its a lot smaller logical leep then Evoultion is. There are just some things that cannot be denid is real and C.S lewis hits dead on it with the Law of Human
Analyse the key beliefs of a religious and secular world view in relation to ultimate questions – Taylor Murfitt.
The history of religion continues to play an important role in defining why certain aspects of religion are the way they are today. Understanding religion’s history can also help one appreciate the importance, value, and determination that certain individuals went through in order for that particular religion to gain freedom and acceptance in society. Throughout history, Christianity has shown exactly this. By learning about its history, one can gain an understanding of how it emerged into being one of the most popular religions in the world. Furthermore, better understanding of the religion, both historically and contemporarily, can help dispel any negative preconceived notions about Christianity.