preview

Analysis Of Richard Taruskin No Ear For Music

Good Essays

Richard Taruskin is one of the many American musicologists and historians whose interest is in the theory of music performance. The author of many literary works such as No Ear for Music: The Scary Purity of John Cage is mainly interested in Russian folk literature where he analyzes the historical trends behind every story. The American author is also well-renowned for his famous articles written in The New York Times, for instance, ‘The Danger of Music and other Anti-Utopian Essays’ and others with a strong relation to social, cultural and political issues in the essays. This essay is a response to Taruskin’s No Ear for Music: The Scary Purity of John Cage. The essay will focus on analyzing its critical argument in an attempt to really …show more content…

Cage did his very best work by combining as many sounds as he could get and ended up sacrificing the music result to the dislike of many people.
The first part of this response is to try and identify why John Cage received so much criticism from lovers of traditional music and post war modernists. Cage adopts chance techniques in his compositions and this makes things go awry for him in regard to being referred to as a composer, most critics consider him more of a music philosopher than a composer. Especially after the 19-hour performance of vexations which sadly did not amuse many. The randomness of his compositions makes it hard for him to establish his authority as a composer.
According to Taruskin, Cage’s attitude and naiveté which was evident from his eyes made him contemptuous to the crowd. The composer had a literalistic point of view and was humorless; lovers of traditional music feel that the philosophical notion put up by Cage as a defense was off-putting.
Richard Taruskin’s essay helps expound on John Cage’s notion of autonomous art. He writes that, Cage brought about the true aesthetics of Western art in what he calls to ‘its purest peak.’ Taruskin also relates to Cage’s work as having a notion of ‘purposeful purposelessness.’ Cage’s work was in itself a form of autonomous art because of its hallowedness and special modes of performance, like the piece 4’33”. In addition, there is a middle man who interfaces the audience

Get Access