Animal Research Arguments

Animal research has been around for many years and has caused much controversy. People take many different positions on whether they believe animal research is wrong or under what circumstances animal testing is right. Currently there are widespread guidelines that aim to protect animals from harmful research, but annually there are millions of animals that die or are euthanized due to animal research. Personally I am a full supporter of animal research in almost all circumstances, because although

Animal Research is another name for animal testing, where an estimated twenty-six (26) million animals are being tested on for medical, commercial, and biomedical purposes. Many people stand behind the use of animals, as it furthers scientific research. “The California Biomedical Research Association states that nearly every medical breakthrough in the last 100 years has resulted directly from research using animals” (). They increase functionality as certain animals, such as chimpanzees who share

tested on animals to ensure safety their safety. Animal research has been an important issue which is debated even today. Many people feel that the usage of animals for research is cruel and morally wrong. It is argued that animals are tortured and they go through so much of suffering just for our benefit. However, If we eliminate testing, then it would be a really big change in our lives which could lead to more problems and difficulties rather than actually solving the problem. Animal experiments

products? A million of animals are killed or disabled with complete impunity is an answer for their safety; Therefore, these poor animals have been tested in several experiments throughout the world. However, most of these unkind activities performed in the laboratories are so ruthless we will never image one human doing it to another animal. As an animal right, many people feel that animal testing may have bad influences on them. In this essay, it will be contended that animal testing should be banned

The first argument claims that animal research plays a vital role in virtually every major medical advances in this last century for both human health and veterinary health (Trull, 2014). The first premise says that animal research was a vital role for all medical advances, which is fact-based. However, it is not true because there are medical discoveries that are founded without the use of animal testing such as clinical research. The second premise states that medical treatments have advanced in

occur each day on the issues of animal cruelty and human rights, but when the issues are put together which will reign over the other? The author Peter Singer of “All Animals are Equal” and “Tools for Research” presents his argument for determining when animal experiments are justified. The author starts his paper with a counter argument, questioning if one would be willing to let thousands of people die if those people could be saved by experimentation on a single animal. The answer is a unanimous no;

legitimacy. Mylan Engle Jr.’s argument “The Commonsense Case against Animal Experimentation” in The Ethics of Animal Research attempts to answer the problems of animal research through use of common sense. He does this by trying to give and objective (middle ground) argument against animal research and points out what everyone would consider being inhumane treatment of animals. Engle says: My argument for the immorality of using animals as test subjects in biomedical research is predicated on several

defend the argument for complete abolition of the use of animals in biomedical research. I will ultimately agree with Tom Regan’s claim that “the fundamental wrong is the system that allows us to view animals as our resources.” I will describe DeGrazia’s and Carruthers’ important objections to Regan’s claim as well as Regan and Singer’s responses. I will show that none of the objections overcomes Regan’s central argument. 1) Regan’s Argument: Regan states that the use of animals in research assumes

perspectives for almost every topic that is arguable. Those perspectives are for the topic and against it. Whatever side a person chooses, they need good pieces of evidence and a good argument to back their opinion up, in order to effectively achieve the purpose of trying to get their audience on their side of the argument. There are many controversial topics that constantly have people arguing back and forth, debating on which person is right and on which person has better reasons that make their opinion

About 19,500,000 animals in total are killed in scientific research every year. This means that about twenty percent of the animals tested on each year die, which may not seem like a large percentage; however, if it is taken into account that this happens to the same species in an endless cycle, the numbers can begin to build. Although, through this process of testing, many lifesaving medicines have been created for all types of animals including humans. So, the issue the world is experiencing right