Reasons To Stop Animal Testing In The United States

Approximately 26 million animals are used every year in the United States alone for research and commercial testing (“Background of the Issue” 1). For years, legislators have debated the pros and cons of animal testing, and laws were passed to attempt to fix the inhumane treatment of the cute, innocent testing subjects, the animals. Although the Animal Welfare Act (AWA) was revised numerous times, “the species most commonly used in experiments (mice, rats, birds, fish, reptiles, and amphibians) comprise 99% of all animals in laboratories” and are the animals that are specifically exempted from protection under the act (“Experiments on Animals” 2). A simple fix to animal cruelty during testing is to use alternative methods since human and animal bodies already vary greatly. For years, animal testing was the best option because there was no alternative to testing on a living, whole-body system; however, in the age of technology, there is no reason for millions of animals to be killed due to the severity of the testing. Therefore, animal testing should be banned because alternative methods provide more accurate results since human bodies are very different than animal bodies; furthermore, animal advocacy organizations should promote cruelty-free products more so customers know what to purchase and use.

The opinion of animals in the eyes of the law still compares them to objects: having them seen only as property and not living beings. A law towards better treatment has been passed, however, it has not been enforced. The implemented law is also full of loopholes that scientists have taken advantage over. Ever since that law, the Animal Welfare Act, was passed, even the definition of an animal has come into question. Additionally, a bias has been created in that there is more of a moral concern towards animals like dogs, cats, and primates rather than fish, mice, and rats, however, there are people advocating for the protection of animals not as popularly loved. Animal testing in the United States should be limited to having

“The question is not, ‘Can they reason?’ nor, ‘Can they talk?’ but ‘Can they suffer?’” Jeremy Bentham said this, and this quote has become commonly used when speaking against animal testing. Why should those who are defenseless, have no say on their future? As technology advances, alternative methods of testing have come to the surface, but are ignored by those who believe that the results may not come as accurate. Many countries in the world, such as India and Israel, have passed laws against the use of animals to test cosmetic products. If they were able to use alternative testing methods then why shouldn’t the U.S.?

Thousands of animals are used every year because of it. Scientists, researchers, and or other animal testers use a variety of different animals in their studies. The types of animals they use varies. They often use domestic animals, and primates. When scientists are conducting an experiment they choose the animal that would best relate to a human in that scenario. The animals test the formula while the scientist would conduct an experiment to see how the animal(s)would react to the substance. This is a cruel practice. In a way animals are very similar to humans. When scientists conduct experiments animals still feel pain like a normal person would. However, animals are still very different from humans and often do not provide strong evidence that the product being tested is deemed safe for human use. Overall animal testing is not as effective as many think it

Did you know that over one hundred million animals die a year from animal testing? And that’s just in the U.S.! Animal testing has helped us, but it causes much more harm than good. Testing should have a lot more restrictions, so animals used in experiments experience less pain. Almost all of the animals tested on end up dying, and until then, they are treated cruelly, enduring many experiments. They can all feel things, and they are constantly mentally and physically suffering. All sorts of animals are used in experiments: monkeys, rabbits, cats, dogs, hamsters, guinea pigs, and birds. They have little to no protection, and even protected animals are not safe. Many big brands test their products on animals, such as Lysol, Chapstick, Febreze,

Animal testing is performed every year on millions of animals for the purpose of research into the effectiveness of drugs and treatment for diseases. Many of the animals that get tested vary from a wide range of rodents, to primates, to household pets such as cats and dogs. Today, general testing on animals are cruel, expensive, and generally inapplicable to humans. The world’s most innovative scientists have developed new methods for studying diseases which are safer alternatives for humans than animal testing. Animal testing must be stopped because of the negative consequences it creates. For one, by ending animal testing the U.S could save around 3 trillion dollars a year that are spent on testing alone. In addition, many animals could be set free from the suffering and physical discomfort that they endure while being subjects of human testing. Finally, if animal testing were to be stopped, then scientists could focus on testing that correlates better to human physiology. Experimentation using animals persists not because it’s the best science, but because of archaic habits, resistance to change, and a lack of outreach and education.

Animal testing began after consumer products caused harm to the buyer. In 1930, a mascara called Lash Lure, blinded many women who used it. In 1937, one hundred people died from a new cough syrup called Elixir (Why do companies test cosmetics or other products on animals? 2013). These are two occurrences that pushed people to use animals for testing product safety. Today, the use of animals has expanded into experiments benefiting the medical field. These experimental animal studies are beneficial to the safety of humans, but animals are sacrificed in the process. Animals are usually killed and dissected at the end of the tests to determine the safety or efficacy of a product or drug. Although animal testing has increased the understanding of medical and consumer issues, the ways these discoveries were made are fatal. As a utilitarian, one needs to consider the benefits and harms of animal testing and discover if they find it ethical. A utilitarian usually would not support animal testing because not everyone included is experiencing the best balance of happiness over unhappiness. The issue of animal testing brings up the question of what animal’s rights are.

Throughout the world, right under the human nose, millions of innocent and helpless, animals are being tortured and murdered. They are used for product testing as well as to put into products without consumer knowledge. These defenseless animals are deprived of respect and are victimized to an extent where it becomes unbearable to watch. There are many organizations that are trying to fight for animal rights. However, these organizations struggle with is because there is no legislation in the United States to combat animal testing. Even though it is not against United States regulations, animal testing should be outlawed because of its harmful and cruel effects.

“Each year, more than 25 million animals are used for scientific research in the U.S.” (Ericson). Animal testing has been around for hundreds of years, and it has cause excruciating pain, suffering, and even death to helpless animals. Testing on animals needs to be against the law and no longer be used as a way to examine products. Some ways to solve this would be to ban animal testing over the whole country and to start testing on new technology. All of our technology today, and new technology being built everyday could test products without harming any animals. Animal testing is becoming a worsening problem in the United States and to end it, the government must ban testing on animals and start using technology as a way to examine products.

In testing, animals are experimented on everything from new drugs to burning skin, electrodes into the brain, infecting with diseases, blinding, poisoning for toxicity testing, and other painful procedures. Animals suffer not only from the painful procedures but from the every day stress. They live in metal cages all their lives unable to feel sunshine or fresh air.

Whenever people buy any chemical products, have they ever thought how can manufacturers guarantee the fail-safety of these products? A million of animals are killed or disabled with complete impunity is an answer for their safety; Therefore, these poor animals have been tested in several experiments throughout the world. However, most of these unkind activities performed in the laboratories are so ruthless we will never image one human doing it to another animal. As an animal right, many people feel that animal testing may have bad influences on them. In this essay, it will be contended that animal testing should be banned because it is so cruel, unnecessary and does not always provide satisfactory treatments for human’s illnesses.

One-hundred million animals are killed in the United States alone from animal testing. They are dying because of us we need to stop it before more species of animals go extinct.

Each year in the United States alone, an estimated number of seventy million animals are injured or killed in order for private institutes, household product companies, military training programs, medical research’s, cosmetic industries, educational institutes and governmental agencies to gain knowledge of their own products and narrow out the harmful substances for consumers, All of which has been done at an innocent animal’s expense. Even though these companies have alternative choices to test on rather than animals, they choose to run animal trials due to the lack of rules and regulations to follow when it comes to animal safety. In our society, people seem to find it acceptable to turn a blind eye to these tests, but if the same number

Protecting animals from neglect and cruelty has a long and venerated history in the United States. “A central goal of the animal rights movement has been to draw attention to vivisection and the use of animals in medical and industrial research” (Liechty). Using animals in research and to test the safety of products has been a topic of heated debate for decades. According to data collected by F. Barbara Orlans for her book, In the Name of Science: Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation, sixty percent of all animals used in testing are used in biomedical research and product-safety testing (62). People have different views and feelings about animals. Many look upon animals as companions and family, while others view animals as means for advancing medical techniques or furthering experimental research for drugs and diseases. However, “the fact remains that animals are being exploited by research facilities and cosmetics companies all across the country and around the world” (Lone Star College). Although humans have benefited from successful animal research, the pain, suffering, and deaths of animals could be prevented by alternative testing methods that exist today. The harmful use of animals in experiments is not only cruel and inhumane, but also often ineffective, the U.S has wasted over fifty billion dollars for research on animal testing (Cruelty Free International).

Animal testing has been a controversial topic around the world for many decades. The scientific community has supported animal testing because in the past they have made great discoveries and it has also improved the quality of life and healthcare for people. However, these experiments have proven to be heinous at come at the expense of the animal’s life. Animal testing compromises an animal’s welfare in many ways. They live in horrible conditions throughout the experiments, they are put through unnecessary suffering and experiment results are not always accurate. These are some of the many reasons why animal experimentation is a process that should no longer take place in the United States. Animal testing is unethical and often unsuccessful; therefore it should be banned and replaced with alternatives that will be more effective.