EAE Business School. IMBA. Carlos Díaz. APPEX CORPORATION 1. What problems do you observe in the organization before Ghosh arrived to the company? * In spite of the small size of the company, with 25 employees and a potential business because of the new cellular industry, there was a lack of organization and administration in the company. * Everyone was doing just what they felt like, people where arriving late at work, did things on their own time and the customer service was very poor. * The company had a problem with financial planning and the investors needed someone to put control and an urgent structure. * The employees were …show more content…
New strategy: To have control. Option: Traditional hierarchical structure Hierarchical, Functional Structure * Functions organized as teams: Sales/Marketing team, Software development and services team, Engineering and technology team, Operations team, Finances team, HR team, Administrative team. * Issues: How many distinct functional teams? Marketing separate of sales? Finance and accounting and hr teams by separate? Heads of teams? The titles, desk locations, and if the person that was head of the team was the better for that position. * Results: * The team structure succeeded in focusing the company on completing tasks. * Sales people now focused on sales, financial people did financial planning * The structure improved the company’s basic capabilities. * Ghosh was involved in everything. * After few months: * As a natural tendency, the heads of each team created sub-functions within their team. * The organizational chart grew vertically and horizontally. * Appex ended up having to spend more money on system development and operation than previously * Hired managers that didn’t know about the product and it was very difficult
The major dilemma at hand is avoiding a takeover. The economy was bad at the time, and the company's stock price was thought to be undervalued, as their low P/E ratio of 13.3 indicated. Management needs to find out why their stock price is so undervalued.
Organizational structure. Need for expanding size of executive management team and adding new corporate layers in the corporation.
“The team consists of the CEO, executive VP of Strategy and Corporate, the executive VP of Administration, the presidents of the Eastern and Western areas, the Senior VP of the Law Department and the director of HSE and Operational Excellence” (2007).
What is the culture's position on important issues facing the corporation (that is, on productivity, quality of performance, adaptability to
The company’s existing portfolio has high risk options. They have been funding companies that requires huge amount of capital which increases the company’s risk. Also it was mentioned in the case that firm is experiencing a “Resource Problem”. Members of investment firm had been part of inner
With respect to staffing, I found that I initially had trouble serving customers quickly enough during peak hours. Customers dissatisfied with their queue times often left the store, resulting in lost sales.
1) What are the challenges that Ivan Guillen faces in his role as marketing manager of the RBG business?
2. Set up a quality team that includes union and management members of the company
The organisation structure on the following page represents the core roles and responsibilities that would be expected
company had experienced a shortage of cash and had found it necessary to increase its borrowing
As a stockholder, we think it is important that he is in a senior management position. Dick Van Gaasbeck, the BUM of TechPub, seems to have a good perspective on the team structure. Especially his understanding for the problems of new team members that do not accept the team principle and his appreciation of team players shows that he supports the team concept. Kathy Cairo, on the other hand, does not appreciate the team concept and only sees inefficiencies in team meetings. For the Purple Teams this might have strong implications for the future success. Bob Kiesow as the green teams Associate Creative Director (ACD) likes the team concept. There are some implications though whether he truly appreciates the concept for the right reasons. After Messina left, he became an ACD which might have misaligned his incentives. Additionally, he likes the new structure because it reduces the amount of account executives he has to deal with. Roxie Barnett from the STAR team is not involved in the case, so we assume that she does not cause problems. Given this analysis, we should focus on the top management which includes Pulleyn, Lyon, and Foster. If change takes place in the top management, it will have an optimal effect, significant impacts and long lasting improvements.
Another issue was the finance from the conventional sources which were reluctant to invest. They would need at least £235,000 to add to their own invest of £45,000 to cover the costs and operational losses for 12 months period. But, if it works out, then they would at £1 million profit by year five. Despite their enthusiasm and impressive CVs, the business angels deterred by their lack of experience in this market sector. However, they managed to get an appointment with Maurice Pinto, a private investor, who agreed to invest £235,000 for a 20 percent share in the company.
There were several core problems that were interrelated around the strategy, organization, and structure of the company. Strategically, they were trying to do too many things. It wasn’t clear what the core businesses were,
1. Earlier partner – premier – small player ,did not match up to fiats requirements for capital commitments
4. How does this case illustrate how strategic intent needs to be matched by both organizational capability and managerial competence; and show how such