Argumentative Essay: Gun Control Laws In The United States

Gun Control Laws have been proven ineffective. Cities like Chicago and Detroit have very strict gun control laws, yet they have some of the highest crime rates, whereas cities with more guns have lower crime rates. Places that have a higher rate of gun ownership, have less murders. Gun control laws do not prevent criminals from breaking the law. Criminals will still obtain firearms, or

Gun control in the United States has been a hot debate for years. In the year 2015 there were 372 mass shootings in the United States ( (Rienzi, 2016), sparking even more debate. 22% of Americans own firearms (Rienzi, 2016) and firmly believe in the second amendment of the constitution. Surely, an agreement on gun law reform can be met while also protecting the second amendment. Right?

We have +400% more shootings than the next country over the last 50 years and it seems to have no decline in sight. There is a saying that says, “If it’s not broken don't fix it.” However, our system is currently extremely flawed. A shooting happens, we mourn the dead for a week, or even a day, the gun debate comes up, and we move on with our lives. The common trend is to take the guns away from people, and to make it harder to own a firearm. When it comes down to it, the laws do not matter to these shooters. You want to make it harder to purchase a firearm with more background checks and more hoops to jump through? Who says they buy the guns legally? You put up a sign that says gun free zone? Well if there is a sign saying so then of course they won't bring one in do do harm right? There are three types of people in this world. The wolves, the sheep, and the sheepdogs. The wolves will alway look for blood, to prey on the others with their teeth and tenacity. The solution is to not have less sheepdogs in hopes the wolves will feel bad for the unprotected sheep, but instead will continue to prey on the weak. More sheepdogs equals less likely of a wolf attack, and that is a visualization that we can all live

Individuals have the right to defend themselves. There are too many gun control laws – additional laws will not lower gun crime rates. What is needed is enforcement of current laws. Gun control laws do not prevent criminals from obtaining guns there are guns and if criminals need them they will get them, just as if I need food or water I will get them even if that means stealing. More guns in the hands of law abiding citizens means less crime if I have a gun someone will not try to rob me because they know that if they try I will protect myself at my thing.

There are also many countries and cities that have tried to put Gun Reform Laws in place but many have failed. According to the many police reports from Chicago Illinois, a city with some of the strictest gun laws in the US, since the gun laws were put in place the crime has only gone up and it has the highest homicide rates out of all fifty states. Some people may say that Chicago has those problems because you can get guns from another state and easily bring it into Illinois, but if you look at the countries that have gun control you will see that the same thing that is happening in Chicago is happening in those countries, just on a larger scale. For example, Mexico, where most types and calibers are reserved to military and law enforcement, still has one of the highest homicide rates in the world. Even with these many places where gun control laws have not worked, many people still believe that gun laws would prevent gun deaths. It is true that gun laws could stop the occasional gun death, but it is not going to stop

According to The Second Amendment of the Constitution, the citizens of the United States have the right to own and bear arms, in order to form a well-regulated militia for the security of the states. This right has been discussed for decades as an important issue for the American society, and it has been one of the most controversial issues in the second half of the twentieth century until nowadays. This right germinated with the threat to freedom that the standing army of professional soldiers brought to the Americans. Some argued that the right to bear arms is mainly concerned with self-defense while others argued that this right was implemented to avoid militia disarmament and protect the Free State. This right was

Even though people want more strict gun laws, we should be able to protect ourselves because people buying guns illegally and using it for crime and not for good use. Wikipedia lets us know that weapon control is the laws that manage the

Gun control and the process to possess firearms more difficult has been a controversial topic in politics for decades. Imagine how the founding fathers of the United States would feel about many modern day politicians proposing for more gun control. Disarming Americans will strip law-abiding citizens from protection of the crazy criminals who will not obey the law. Founding fathers; George Washington, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton, and many others would be unimpressed at these politicians removing pieces from the Constitution slowly.

Secondly, if Gun Control laws were made extremely strict numerous people would still be able to receive guns through illegal gun control. As stated in NavjoCode “Illegal guns are a huge trade and business in the United States. Even if gun control laws were made much more strict, these criminals would still be able to obtain illegal weapons and use them to inflict harm and commit violent crimes. The only difference would be that the people who are not criminals would not have the ability to defend themselves” This quote shows that if we enforced these laws there are multiple ways to get these gun back. .“The illegal gun trade often takes its form in robbery and casual exchanges of weapons. Young criminals can steal guns from either homes that have guns, or from gun stores themselves, and thereby arm themselves. Also, many who have caused gun violence received their first gun from a family member, or a fellow gang member, instead of

(1) In America, gun control has already taken place, but they have not yet taken a stand on ammunition amounts. America has the most mass shooting rates in the past 50 years compared to any other country. People blame it on “mentally unstable” people because they think that they are a problem in America when really they aren't focusing on the real problem: ammunition. Ammunition is used in every shooting no matter if it was an automatic gun or semi-automatic pistol. (1) (2) America does not have ammunition regulations and some believe if the U.S. had ammunition laws the people with guns would have a harder time shooting mass amounts of people with a restricted amount of bullets. In the past year, the U.S. has had multiple mass shootings, but they have not been put on the news or put out to the

On October 1, 2017 58 people died and 422 were people seriously injured. Almost 500 people were injured that night on the Vegas strip, the gun the perpetrator was using was a legal gun, but he added slide fire to his gun which made it an automatic weapon, which is illegal.

Do you want to always feel safe in your home, at school, or at work? Well, increasing gun control laws will rip that sense of security away from you. Gun control does not work; it endangers the citizens of the United States because the crime rates will rise like they have in Chicago. Politicians do not know how to fix gun violence, gun control has failed miserably and it is unconstitutional.

In light of recent events, you'd think that people in the United States would be scrambling to put a gun control law in place. But of course not! Conservatives are still stuck on the fact that it's a violation of their rights. I don't know about them, but I think being killed is a worse violation of my rights than not being able to own a gun. This is what I found most interesting this week.

In Middleton, Idaho a toddler accidentally shot an infant in the face with a loaded handgun Monday afternoon. Investigators say the 10-month-old and 3-year-old were in a vehicle and were temporarily left unattended. Police say the toddler found a loaded handgun in the vehicle and unintentionally fired the weapon on the 10-month-old child’s cheek. While this story is shocking, gun deaths are pretty common. In 2010 unintentional firearm injuries caused the deaths of around 606 people (not including intentional), (kboi2.com). Statistics say that 32,000 deaths are gun-related per year in the United States. Gun control has become an aspect of the political world that is constantly changing based on how gun rights activists and gun control supporters argue and provide for sufficient reasoning for their cause. Two recent ads, one which shows a picture of a gun, and another that uses a picture of two children, one holding a book and the other, holding a gun. Both convey a powerful message, but ultimately the second is more effective, due to its comparison between the importance of safety.

On December 14th, 2012, a renewed debate concerning The United States’ gun laws sparked after the deadliest mass shooting at the high school age and the second deadliest mass shooting by an individual occurred. Twenty-year-old Adam Lanza stormed into Sandy Hook Elementary school armed and motivated. Although his motive is still unknown to this day he must have had a legitimate reason to relentlessly shoot and kill twenty children and six members of the staff. Before entering the school, Lanza returned to his childhood home and murdered his mother. After much speculation, the American Justice System deemed Lanza mentally unstable, a common theme in mass murder trials. I believe that in order to prevent any more grueling tragedies, The United States must change the current gun