preview

Arguments Against Animal Testing In The United States

Decent Essays

Justice for Animals The opinion of animals in the eyes of the law still compares them to objects: having them seen only as property and not living beings. A law towards better treatment has been passed, however, it has not been enforced. The implemented law is also full of loopholes that scientists have taken advantage over. Ever since that law, the Animal Welfare Act, was passed, even the definition of an animal has come into question. Additionally, a bias has been created in that there is more of a moral concern towards animals like dogs, cats, and primates rather than fish, mice, and rats, however, there are people advocating for the protection of animals not as popularly loved. Animal testing in the United States should be limited to having …show more content…

Animals protected by the Animal Welfare Act, the only federal law passed that regulates animal testing, make-up 10 percent of the animals tested, (About the Issue). At first, these animals - mice, rats, and birds - were considered being protected, but a 2002 Amendment declared they do not count as warm-blooded animals, resulting in 90 percent of tested animals not protected under the Animal Welfare Act (About the Issue). This Amendment did, however, require a record of a number of animals being tested on, but it is not regulated so those reports do not get submitted. Committees that document animal misconduct are unable to intervene in the experiment if they believe mistreatment is present in the experiment, but instead have to submit a report that takes more time to reach the powers able to stop the experiment than the amount of time it takes to perform the experiment. The discard towards this issue has left enforcers powerless as well as participating in the experimentations that occur. Animal experiments are usually used for determining how a product will affect a human being, but experiments also can be rewarded with research grant awards that will fund other future experiments. In order to lessen the number of experiments animals need to be part of, most experiments can be replaced with non-animal alternatives. The transition from animals to alternative testing strategies, however, is a risky process: testing animals and determining the effect the tests have on humans is already a guess, but using other methods that are not as popular and scientists are not as familiar with creates a potential threat to the experiments being conducted. Because of this threat and without the experiments being regulated, the use of animals in testing in federally-funded labs

Get Access