Opposing Arguments Against Animal Testing

The experimentation of animals is very disagreeable in our society. It is cruel to animals and people with the work that goes into it. Testing on animals should be stopped because it is an unhelpful, unnecessary, and an expensive, time wasting, way of testing products.

Imagine walking into a cosmetic or medical research laboratory and seeing thousands of animals locked up in cages, deformed, injured, even dead. In 2010 a total of 26 million animals in the US were tested on (thehastingscenter.org). Animals have the closest genetics to humans than anything else yet animal testing is a cruel and inhumane job and not all animals have similar organ functions to humans. Animals should not be used for scientific or commercial testing.

Imagine this, you and a big group of people are stuck in the desert and there's no water in sight.You send a young man to look for water in the burning hot sun.He finds a lifesaving amount of water miles from everyone else .Then he brings it back to the people saving their lives but risking his own.Even though the man's life was risked, you saved more people than you hurt.This is what animal testing does.Animal testing saves thousands of lives every single day.

Every year, millions of animals are used in medical research to find the cure of different diseases and infections. This is because most animals have more or less the same physical processes as humans hence tend to give way good results. Animal rights activists claim that the animals have right to life and humane treatment therefore it is unethical and treatment to do the testing on them. Although the former statement is true, animals should be used in medical research because there is no other alternative for medical research on living organisms since it can saved life, helps to obtain good results and protect humans before starring their trial on humans.

Most of humans are egoists which they think only about their benefits, and the other creatures are the victim of our selfishness. Animals testing is one of the horrible violation for the animals right, and there are many cons for this gruesome act.

Testing on animals has been a thing for so many years now. In fact, many scientists believe it should be done before human testing. But with it being around for so long, it has become a subject of controversy. People around the world share their views and opinions about whether it's really necessary, and some even question if the process is even ethical. While it is sad that animals have to come to terrible fates,the process of animal testing is absolutely essential to test the safety of products. Besides the obvious benefit, which is that animal testing saves lives, results are generated quicker with animal testing, so diseases can be cured faster. Sometimes the illnesses cured can affect animals too, so humans aren’t the only ones benefited. Animals are also benefited by the guidelines put in place by the Animal Welfare Act, which makes sure that animals are treated fairly during the testing process. All in all animal testing is without a doubt crucial to test products that save both human and animal lives.

Animal testing is a cruel thing to do. It is inhuman and should be stopped immediately. What is being done to these helpless animals is disgusting. We do not put into consideration that these animals have feelings too. While we continue to bring harm to them we do not consider their feelings.

Millions of animals are being tested and half of them died each day because of these tests. The animal should not be treated thing way because how would you feel if people were taking body parts out or put in. Many of these animals are going extinct because of the tests.According to reporters”Animal testing has never really worked. In fact, 90 percent of medications approved for human use after animal testing later proved ineffective or harmful to humans in tests on humans(By KELLY OVERTON).One might think that testing these animals

Animal testing has led to many life saving cures in humans, as well as animals. They have resulted in beneficial results in humans, as well as animals. Some tests may seem cruel, however the animals are treated somewhat humanely

. According to the former scientific executive of Huntingdon Life Sciences, Animal tests and human results agree “5%-25% of the time.” There is already technologe to stop animal testing.Wyss institute is developing chips to repalce animale testing these chips mimmic human body fuctions .They said them selves that animale testing is realy expesnive, time consuming, and low success rate. In addition using these new testing chips allowes scientists to have better success on finding results with human realated tests.

Testing on animals is a highly controversial issue in our society today and because of which, the testing done on animals is highly regulated and it has laws in place to protect animals from mistreatment. Not only are there laws that govern how the testing is done, but animal research has been regulated by the Animal Welfare Act which ensures that the animals are in proper enclosure sizes, and that they have access to clean food and water and other amenities to enhance the quality of life for them. In addition to the Animal Welfare Act, all proposals for the use of animals for research must be approved by an institutional Animal Care and Use Committee which further insures the fact that the testing can be beneficial and isn’t for experimental purposes only. Now just because there are these regulations set in place, it doesn’t mean that the scientists are going to do the bare minimum to just to meet the requirements. Because contrary to popular belief, scientists want the animals to be healthy, socialized, and have a higher standard of living conditions prior and during their testing. They want to ensure the wellbeing of the animals because according to the scientific journal Nature Genetics “Stressed or crowded animals produce unreliable research results, and many phenotypes are only accessible in contented animals in enriched environments, so it’s in the interests of

Animal testing is something that is extremely prevalent in our world. It is crucial for any medical issues and many other day-to-day things we do and use. People, though, do not like the fact that we kill innocent animals everyday. In our society, there is a lot of animal abuse. It is sanctioned and legal to test on animals, even if that means that we harm and abuse animals. There is no limit to how much the animals are harmed because they are not protected by laws since testing is completely legal. This is an issue that is not really talked about, but needs to be discussed. Animal testing results are not an accurate predictor of the effects of many products on humans. If this is true, why do we test on them? The supporters of animal testing rely on scientific evidence and experiments to prove that the results of animal testing will benefit humanity, but the people who protest against animal testing want to protect the rights of all animals and try to find flaws with the scientific experiments being done on animals.

Animal testing is seemingly needed to test medicines, cosmetics, and other consumer products. Imagine poor helpless animals, trapped in cages, and having chemicals injected into their bodies. These animals just want to be free, but they are treated poorly so the scientists know if a product is safe or not for humans. But who is this really helping? The animals are being mistreated by being experimented on the humans behalf. Some of the experiments fail and end up killing the innocent animals. Animals should have the same rights humans have. They feel pain, they have emotions like humans, but they do not have the voice to say no. Even though some say that it is necessary to test on animals, there are better methods of testing consumer products.

Animals, we can either have them as a pet,food, or a testing subject. Now even though we can do that with them, is it right if we do? Animals, they are appropriate for testing because they are similar to humans in many ways.The fact that animals are close to us humans, it makes scientist have an advantage over trying to test out their medicine. Scientist do not have to struggle trying to find data on something else, they have the animals right there, they can use them. Now all this is true, but again, is it right? Just because animals can not speak up for themselves and say “No!” does not mean we can use them. Its cruel, and it’s just not right for them. Testing on Animals has its pro’s, and its con’s. The reason we need animal testing is 1.Test

With the technology and social development, the animal testing is common and widely used in lots of industry. The debate about whether animal testing is fair or not last for decades. My position is that animal testing is fair. Animal testing could be used in psychology research. In most of the time, animal has the similar thinking process as human, which could be applied to analysis human behavior. Also in pharmaceutical industry, animal testing can reduce the death of human life in new drug development. In law of nature, human is on the top of the food chain. Human consumes animals for surviving reason. This is the fact that anyone could not reject or ignore. However, the opposing voice comes from some organization likes the PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals). They believe that animals have the same right as human in term of ethical treatment. They did not encourage the animals testing in psychology research. They hold the position that animal testing is unfair. For most general people, they think animals are so cute and should be our friends. Thus they should not be used for testing reason. I will illustrate three points to support the argument that the animal testing is fair.