Genetically Modified Organisms or GMO’s, refer to the plants or animals created through the gene splicing techniques of biotechnology. To clarify, the organisms are altered in their DNA to create an outcome. An unexpected example of this would be a watermelon which should be an all natural, healthy, plant. All Watermelon no matter the colour or size contain seeds. They are in most fruits yet, in grocery stores, you will find advertising for seedless watermelon. This is a GMO. It was altered as a seed so that when the seed became a plant and the plant bore fruit, the watermelon would be seedless. This is the topic that I chose to research about. The reason behind my curiosity in this topic is the controversy surrounding it and the strong opposing …show more content…
The popular media sources that I will be using is: What You Need To Know About Genetically Modified Organisms by Justine Alford, 10 Reasons to Avoid GMOs by Jeremy Smith, Five Good Reasons to Support GMOs by Battelle Staff, Understanding GMO by David Suzuki and finally, The Good, Bad and Ugly about GMOs by Natural Revolution. The Scholarly sources that I will use are: GMO Food by David E. Newton, The Good, Bad and Ugly about GMOs by Susan K. Harlander, Mendel in the Kitchen: Scientist's View of Genetically Modified Food by Fedoroff, Nina, Brown, Nancy Marie; Perceived and Potential …show more content…
I will incorporate both scholarly and popular media articles to back it up. The world's leading producers of “Genetically Modified” crops are the United States, Argentina, Brazil, Canada, India and China. In 2006, GM crop production also reached noteworthy levels in Paraguay, South Africa, Uruguay and Australia. Seeing this its obvious that a large portion of the world uses GMO’s. There must be a reason, and a purpose behind a way of life that most countries can agree on and actively use to feed their general population. According to the article written by Justine Alford called “What you need to know about Genetically Modified Organisms”, she poses the questions “Why do we need GMOs?”. To summarize, she is saying that it is a population issue. The population is a worldwide issue in the way that the world is over populated. There isn’t enough food to feed everyone. Simply put, we can’t afford to lose crops due to crop diseases and unexpected weather disasters and climate change conditions. GMOs, she says; are the answer to this problem. GMO crops can fit the climate of the different geographies and conditions of every conditions as they can be genetically altered to fit the conditions. Aside from the benefit of saving dying crops, they can also help with a deficiency of some sort in a select country. Justine says that 250 million in the children of the world have a deficiency of certain key vitamins that the body
The argument that I wish to refute will be, “Monsanto’s Reasons for Fighting GMO Labeling? It Loves You ” this is a persuasive argument that would like to bring in a younger uneducated audience in to believe that GMO labeling is bad. This cartoon was published on the humor section of planetsave.com. This means that this is little more than a brief chuckle at the argument and then disregarding it because it has not backing behind it. The author appears to be against GMO labeling because consumers will try to research what GMO is and use up resources and electricity. This will worsen pollution levels, and cause them to look deeper into the topic.
So why do we use GMOs? Well there is a “So-called advantage” with these products that it costs less to produce and they are better quality. But do we know if they’re better quality or our bodies? There’s not enough research to prove that the human race and other organisms have suffered dire consequences from consuming these genetically engineered foods. However there are some linkages that link GMOs to some health problems, environmental damage, and farmer/consumer rights.
GMO’s or Genetically Modified Food is one of the most controversial topics that have been studied and debated for over 40 years. Scientists on both sides of the spectrum claim that these modified foods are safe for consumption, but also some argue that these foods are toxic and very harmful to human life. GMO’s are genetically modified organisms that are created and added in a lab experiment where DNA are extracted from one gene and added to another plant or animal. This allows the genes to mix with the DNA to create a desired product. For example, bigger apples, larger oranges, taller animals, and plants that can survive the changing climate. GMOs are different from organic food and products because chemicals and DNA modification is not needed for these natural stuff.
Gmos can cause very irrevocably damage towards the environment. And they cause a huge risk of food-based allergies towards the humans. Gmos are also not fully tested to be eaten. The pollen spreads the pharmaceutical genes into the gmo foods supply. They have a lack of consumers due to the creation of ethical dilemma. There is a toxin that fights pest is the caused of the allergies to start. But, gmos affect the younger kids more quicker than older people. The AAEM suggest non-gmos diet for every patient.
In order for a person to make a smart logical decision regarding a pro or anti-GMO position one must understand what a GMO is. A plant that is genetically modified and then the Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) of one plant is forced into another kind of plant to be considered a GMO. This process takes place in a laboratory. It is not limited to just plants. Animals can also be modified. Viruses, insects, bacteria, humans, and animals can all supply the foreign DNA. Some researchers also refer to the process as Genetic Engineering(GE) (10 Reasons”).
Agronomists have been working on these problems for years, but the rapid population growth of humans makes overcoming these challenges increasingly urgent. If we can’t feed the world, it will eventually feed on us.” (Newsweek/United Nations) Scientists find a way to add “medicine” to plant genes, which help it withstands pest attacks and drought problems.“Some GMO corn crops can protect harvests in water-limited conditions better than conventionally produced crops. Other GMOs can also promote use of no-till farming, which keeps more moisture in the soil. No-till also enables farmers to make fewer passes through the field using machinery, which means less fuel used and greenhouse gases emitted.”(Monsanto) GMOs are useful for helping with planting crops in any area of the world.
Do you find the labels on your favorite snacks to be helpful to most consumers? Many would answer this question yes, and argue that labels contain important information that all buyers should know for health or safety reasons. While this is true, this argument should not apply to GMO labeling. GMOs, of genetically modified organisms, are foods with altered genes from biotechnological techniques. They are used to help foods to be preserved, or prevent certain pests from eating or infecting them, or even to have other desired and beneficial traits. While many may disagree, including use of these GMOs on food labels is completely ineffective. They make GMOs appear to be foreign and dangerous. There are already organic foods for those who are suspicious of genetically altered foods that cause harm. These labels would also make buyers spend more money down the road. A bill to label GMOs would cause multiple issues for producers and buyers everywhere.
It is the year of 2036 and there is a farmer tending to his corn in Belvidere, Illinois. The farmer’s name is William Goldstein and his wife, Mona, calls him inside for supper. William tells his wife that he is eternally grateful that the “pesticide resistant, sweet-corn” seeds he started using about 20 years ago gave him a much larger yield and in turn, allowed him to sell more of his corn. Farmer William begins to cry tears of joy that he was able to turn his originally unsuccessful farm, filled with worm infested, bitter corn, to a farm stocked with endless bounties of sweet, worm-free corn. The old farmer says that he is glad that Congress overturned the outlaw of GM seeds in the year 2016 because if they had not, he would have never had
Imagine a farm that produces all sorts of vegetables and fruits. Now imagine a little child about five years old with a food allergy of some sort. She is running out onto that farm wanting to eat a juicy apple but little did she know that this was a farm that produces genetically modified plants. They recently they manipulated all of the apples to have the food she has an allergy to in the apples so that they don't go bad as fast. She is all alone and she sees a perfect apple and she takes a bite and she is having an allergic reaction and she is having a hard time breathing. Her mom comes to find her and sees her struggling to breath on the ground this would be a devastating scenario, So this is why GMO is a No so we can protect people.
This article is about the Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) labeling law that President Obama signed, the law allows companies to label their products in anyway they want to indicate the presence of GMO products. This article discusses the controversy between both sides of the GMO labeling debate, the pro labeling side desiring to know what they are consuming and the against labeling side expressing their fear that the label of GMO on a product would make consumers turn away unnecessarily. This law was a compromise to both sides as it requires a form of labeling that makes it possible for inquiring consumers to find what is in their food but also does not require companies to clearly state the presence of GMO.
In December 2014, a Harvard professor wrote an article outlining the many benefits of GMOs (genetically modified organisms) and why it is a good idea to use them. This professor is now surrounded by controversy because he failed to note his connection to the largest producer of GM seeds, Monsanto, who not only told him to write the article but also gave him the major points he was to address. Why was this such a huge deal, and why did Monsanto want a pro-GMO article out there so badly? The GMO debate is largely controversial, but largely misunderstood because of the misinformation given by biased writers, such as John Hibma, a nutritionist and author who wrote the article “More Pros Than Cons.” What many people do not realize is that genetic modification is a serious issue and that articles like Hibma’s fail to disclose the truth about the numerous health, crop, and environmental concerns surrounding GMOs.
Should people be worried about genetically engineered food? Many people are starting to question what it is exactly that they are eating and how it could possibly harm them. Specifically, the harm that could befall them from GM food. A genetically modified organism is something that received one or more genes from another organism. There are three arguments that the people worried about GM food put on the table; those arguments being: GM food should be labeled, GM foods are not safe to eat, and GM crops won’t end world hunger and feed the whole world.
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are living organism that have went through a process of having their genetic material modified by inserting a foreign gene into them (GMO Facts). The plant having the modifications done then absorbs the gene and it goes into immediate effect and begins to perform as expected. This process was done to benefit us humans greatly and resolve world issues, but it has been discovered to have negative effects on us humans and the environment. With much research done throughout many years it led to the first trans generic plant being developed in 1983 (qtd. In Kelminsky, Peeling, and Gani). This plant was a tobacco plant that was resistant to anti-biotic (qtd. In Kelminsky,
GMOs (or “genetically modified organisms”) are they safe to consume? Some people believe they are, others believe they aren’t. GMOs have been known to cause health problems like cancer, as well as creating new diseases, having toxins, and developing allergies. I believe that the U.S. government should label all foods as to what kind of GMOs are used in them. Most countries in Europe have it by law that all foods containing GMOs in them must be labeled, that way people know exactly what they are eating. I also believe that GMOs are just too much of a risk, and that people should not consume them. Firstly what are GMOs, and when were they first being used.
The human population is growing rapidly. With the growth in the human population, the demand for food is also growing at an unprecedented rate. Arguably, farms are unable to naturally provide the world’s population the food needed by natural means. This may seem like a big issue, but humans came up with an ingenious solution: genetically modified organisms, commonly known as GMO’s. Genetically modified food has been able to offset the worlds growing demand for food, and all our food problems seem to be solved. Or have they? I will use information from: Wendell Berry’s, The Pleasures of Eating, Jon Entine and JoAnna Wendel’s, 2000+ reasons Why GMO’s Are Safe to Eat, Robin Mather’s, The Threats from Genetically Modified Foods, along with references from Food Inc., to explain how genetically modified food is being used in a way that negatively affects the livestock, our health, the ecosystem, and the potential threats genetically modified crops have on our future.