One argument that is often presented against the belief of Christians, more precisely that of the existence of God, is the problem of evil; and many apologists have continued to counter the questions and disputes. The problem of evil suggests that, if God truly exists, and is in fact good, then the evil we see in the world would not exist. How could a good God allow the rape of women and children? Or, how can a good God see the poverty and starvation of millions around the globe and do nothing? These are just a couple of questions among many. Two apologists, David Hart and Alvin Plantinga have addressed this issue that plagues many, both in the minds of unbelievers, as well as believers. To explore the approaches of each of these men, let …show more content…
It is us, humanity, with our fallen nature and our own evil inclinations, which are the ultimate cause of calamities and wickedness. It is allowed by God because His desire was a people who would choose Him and this is the world by which we are able to possess the free will needed in order to do any choosing at all. As a matter of fact, the possession of free will to choose a good, holy and just God suggests that there are those who will not – it also suggests two natures, the good and the bad. If choosing God is the perfect choice and the opposite is not, it also suggests that the world and mind necessarily would have the ability for both perfection and imperfection. This would also offer an account for the natural tragedies that we experience.
The idea of free will and the fall of man, in and of itself, does seem to answer the problems of malicious evil – murder, rape, oppression, robbery, etc. The issue with natural phenomena – such as the birth of a handicapped child, accidents that leave people disabled, hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, and death – is that all of these are not necessarily the result of a specific individual’s evil action, or a society’s evil philosophies. So how do we come to understand the issue of tragic natural
…show more content…
It is humanity, the sinfulness, the fallen state, that provides the explanation for evil and ultimately for death. David Hart gives the bluntly stated point of view that death has no purpose. Scripture tells us that death is an enemy of God. One aspect of these “evils” that was not addressed was the use of them by God to further His purpose. Perhaps this is where the routine Christian response is birthed. We see in some area of Scripture where God used these things – such as the death of the first born in Egypt as an example, and other plagues; or perhaps we could look at the fire and brimstone that fell upon Sodom and Gomorrah. These were used, by God, as both punishment and as a sign to His authority. The philosophers seemed to answer the question of evil in general, and harmonized in their account. However, it is important for us to understand that some things – such as the death of the firstborn of Egypt, both elderly and infant, was at the direction and command of God. Evil, it would seem, at least in some regards, is in the eye of the
In his essay, "The Magnitude, Duration, and Distribution of Evil: a Theodicy," Peter van Inwagen alleges a set of reasons that God may have for allowing evil to exist on earth. Inwagen proposes the following story – throughout which there is an implicit assumption that God is all-good (perfectly benevolent, omnipotent, and omniscient) and deserving of all our love. God created humans in his own likeness and fit for His love. In order to enable humans to return this love, He had to give them the ability to freely choose. That is, Inwagen holds that the ability to love implies free will. By giving humans free will, God was taking a risk.
If we humans are responsible for “human evil”, then surely, only God can be responsible for “natural evil”. Yet if we apply God’s benevolent feature, the fact that natural evil exist would be contradictory, unless we alter the meaning and definition of natural evil. Either natural evil is not really evil or there is a good purpose behind the natural evils. Though free will defense does not answer these two questions, or at least not directly. We can also assume God cannot create this world without including said natural evil, but then that would, per
One of the main arguments used by non-believers against the existence of God is the presence of evil and suffering in the world. The term ‘evil’ is often used to describe something that is morally wrong. Philosophers make a distinction between moral evil and natural evil. Moral evil results from human actions that are morally reproachable, and Natural evil results from the malfunctioning of the natural world, which produces entities such as disease and famine.
In Chapter Seven, The Problem of Evil from “The Sacred Quest: An Invitation to the Study of Religion” by Lawrence Cunningham and John Kelsay the authors examine various possible reasons for why evil exists. I will be examining further the information provided in this Chapter in order to attempt to answer the question, “Why do bad things happen to good people?” First, I will provide my point of view on what I consider to be evil and good. Next, I will explain why I believe in the appeal to sovereignty view and how it applies to the ultimate question. Finally, I will provide counterarguments to my explanation.
Natural evil is encompassing reality of pain, suffering, death caused by natural forces/natural disasters (Ford 72). God gives humans freedom and doesn't want to manipulate them like robots and even when the freedom is misused, God offers ways to cope with it such as forgiveness, reconciliation, patience and healing (Ford 73). Sadly, this world has too many accidents and natural disasters that are unavoidable, but through despair and hard times God is always there to offer His love. Although humans suffer from sin and death, God does not allowed it to have the last word by offering faith, hope and love (Ford 73). Wherever there is evil, there will be goodness
Natural evil is evil caused not by humans but by our environment around us; this includes hurricanes, earthquakes, volcanoes, etc. This is considered a problem for the Free Will Defense because natural evil exists regardless of the existence of Free Will. The answer to this problem is that it is possible that the naturally evil events are caused by demons, thus absolving both humanity and God from any moral responsibility. Another possible answer is that at one point humans were able to avoid these natural evils through the use of psychic abilities and precognition; this theory speculates that these abilities were lost due to the fall from Eden.
Lance Marrow attempts to work out the complicated opinions and ideas on the concept of evil in his scholarly essay. He begins by giving an overview of the evil that exists in the world right now, along with questions on the existence of evil. Marrow then goes on to addressing the main definitions of evil supported by stories that follow those definitions. Finally the essay concludes with the questioning of the existence of evil in collaboration with God and on what the world would be without the existence of evil.
What about natural evil? Natural evil would be things like earthquakes, tsunamis and other natural disasters. Why doesn't God stop those? You can look at Noah's flood and know that God doesn't stop disasters, but sometimes might even cause them. This ties into the Christian explanation of the human predicament. Paradise has been lost due to human moral shortcomings. As Romans 8:22 says, “We know that the whole creation has been groaning as in the pains of childbirth right up to the present time”. To understand evil, you have to first understand the nature of
One of the oldest dilemmas in philosophy is also one of the greatest threats to Christian theology. The problem of evil simultaneously perplexes the world’s greatest minds and yet remains palpably close to the hearts of the most common people. If God is good, then why is there evil? The following essay describes the problem of evil in relation to God, examines Christian responses to the problem, and concludes the existence of God and the existence of evil are fully compatible.
To begin, I will discuss what I believe evil to be. Conceptually speaking, there are two forms of evil, natural and moral. Natural evil consists of phenomena which occur due to natural sources within creation. This form of evil includes weather disasters, cosmic barriers such as asteroids or collapsing stars, planetary movements such as earthquakes and volcanoes, animal instincts such as viral outbreaks or bear attacks (i.e. anything that drives self-preservation in the animal world), and so on. Conceptually, natural evils are not affected by human involvement. In other words, these phenomena would occur regardless if humanity existed in creation or not. Once an otherwise naturally occurring phenomenon happens as a result of human behavior, i.e. global warming, it no longer fits this form of evil, conceptually speaking.
When asking yourself why God would allow bad things to occur or bad people to do specific things, I see to things happening. One is many lose their faith in God, especially if multiple things happen within in a specific time frame. These people lose their faith in a higher power and hope if they repeatedly asked for help or guidance in prayer to God. Now some people just have times of weakness like this and are able to return to their faith, but
The question "Does God Exist?" is a well-known asked question in the world. Most people believe they know the answer to it. The religious people would say, well of course he does, while the non-religious people or atheist would say no He does not exist. Because evil exist and chaos exists, God cannot be all-powerful. In the modern world, there are many different opinions as to whether a God exists or not. This has been an issue of great dispute because many people reverence different gods or no god at all. For years, many philosophers have come up with theories, proofs, and hypotheses to prove the existence of God, and a canon of arguments has been developed. The Arguments for the Existence of God sets out to explain the everyday philosophical arguments for theism, and so to explore the case for the existence of God. The arguments themselves are arranged under the following headings: The Ontological Argument, The Cosmological Argument, The Teleological Argument, and The Moral Argument will determine if there really is a God.
In the course of this essay I will argue that evil is not compatible with the existence of god. This means that evil and God cannot coexist because if god were present, the existence of evil would contradict all that god is believed to be. Abrahamic religions insist that God both created the world and that he preserves and maintains it. Christianity claims that God is all knowing and is boundless in his abilities. Religions claim that God is benevolent, and only wants the best for humanity and the universe, as his creations. If all of the above statements be true, then it is hard to understand why god would allow evil to thrive right from the beginning of time.
The famous William Paley has a different ontological argument within his text Natural Theology. The title of the reading gives insight to the theory, which focuses on something called natural design. The writing is based on an intricate and extensive analogy between the man made and the natural. For instance, Paley describes a man made watch in great detail. This intense detail sets the notion that each piece must have been put in place by someone, whom we can infer is a watchmaker. He then compares this to the intricacy of nature, which must have been made by a supreme diety. Such complexity could not have come about by chance. Only the most
Solar energy has been translated as natural energy source that’s become beneficial for humans. Solar energy is natural energy from the sun that can be used by converting solar cells into useable energy and can be used to run electricity in business, homes, antennas, watches, etc. Solar energy is important in society because unlike fossils, fuel, and oil that will eventually be gone from our earth, solar energy will be the replacement since it is natural source of electricity acquired from the solar rays making it what known to be as clean energy source. Although, there are a lot of reasons such as solar energy being expensive, taking a lot space, and not being a reliable source of energy in the night time, I still believe that solar energy is beneficial for humans in the way that it reduces electricity bills, is a major source of renewable energy, and helps the environment as it does not produces carbon dioxide.