Army Leadership Style Essay

supporting them in their work as well as providing oversight. All directives given from me will be clear,

Leadership comes in all types of styles. No two Army leaders will have the same style. There is a saying that goes around our ranks today, “Your leadership traits strongly reflect your past leadership.” Meaning that you will develop traits and habits that you have seen in your past leadership. Whether they are good or bad, you will not notice them yourself until you think about what you are doing or saying. It takes time to develop as a leader, and you will know when you find your style that works for you and you’re Soldiers.

NonCommissioned Officers are the backbone of the Marine Corps.   Each leader is very different from the other.   Some Marines enjoy being a corporal only because of the increase in rank and pay.   A few become the tactless leaders junior Marines try to avoid.   Fortunately, many others strive to become the leader that other Marines wish to emulate.   They know what it means to be a good leader.   Those Marines have the traits of a leader and they get to know their Marines

An Army Leader is able and willing to act decisively, within the intent and purpose of his superior leaders, and in the best interest of the organization. Army leaders recognize that organizations built on mutual trust and confidence, successfully accomplish peacetime and wartime missions.” (2006, P. Viii). Balance molds a leader and in turn, an effective leader is a proactive person who works a whole lot smarter. President George Bush (1997) states, “Leadership to me means duty, honor, and country; It means character and it means listening from time to time.” (Adrain, p. 35).

At the end of the day, a true leader “in the army will do these three things live by the army core values, know the warrior ethos, and lead by example”-MSI textbook. Leaders both in and out of the army are held to a higher standard holding themselves in a professional manner at all times. The success of the group is attributed to the leadership styles and core values instilled in the solider to do his job effectively. General Eisenhower once

One important expression for army leadership is BE-KNOW-DO. Army leadership begins with what the leader must BE, the values and attributes that shape character. A leader can think of these as internal and defining qualities possessed all the time. As defining qualities, they make up the identity of the leader. Values and attributes are the same for all leaders, regardless of position, although refined through experience and assumption of positions of greater responsibility. For example, a sergeant major with combat experience may have a deeper understanding of selfless service and personal courage than a new soldier.

My leadership philosophy revolves entirely around the Army Values. In every action I take as a leader, I assess whether or not it lines up with the Army Values and the potential impacts. I have had a variety of leadership assignments during my career, all requiring a different leadership approach, spanning from team leader through platoon sergeant. My conflict resolution skills have greatly evolved through my twelve years in the Army, from rudimentary conversations to in depth problem solving. My professional development has had a profound effect on my leadership abilities, from NCOPD’s to mentorship from senior non-commissioned officers (NCO’s).

Everything great started somewhere, even the US Army. Since the beginning of US history, leadership built up the US Army and military into what is now the strongest in the world. The US Army is the greatest in the world because of the Foundation of US Army Leadership. History, loyalty, accountability, and evolving US Army doctrine are all known as the foundation of US Army Leadership. These foundations are very important to the strength and security of our country.

In accordance with ADP 6-22 “An Army leader is anyone who by virtue of assumed role or assigned responsibility inspires and influences people to accomplish organizational goals. Army leaders motivate people both inside and outside the chain of command to pursue actions, focus thinking and shape decisions for the greater good of the organization.” The leadership style a person portrays determines their effectiveness to influence people to accomplish any mission. I have observed several different leadership styles in my career and the one I associate with is the Transformational Leadership Style. I will articulate my comparison to retired CW5 Robert L. Storey and retired CW4 Athur Frazier and why. “ADP 6-22.” data.cape.army.mil, Aug. 2012, www.bing.com/cr

The Department of the Army states that all writing will be clear, concise, and effective (AR 25-50 page 2). Every Soldier and Officer must be able to understand the writer’s ideas in a single reading, this includes official correspondences. All Army correspondences must aid effective communication and decision making. First, I will introduce you to my background and experiences that I had with formal writing. Lastly, I will address the type of writing style standards the Army utilizes to give you a better understanding.

To fully understand the transformational leadership aspects of military basic training, one must have a picture of what basic training is like. Most recruits are young, and are leaving home for the first time. In the Air Force the first week of the six-and-a-half-week course is controlled chaos for the fifty-five recruits who are placed into a flight, which was a part of a larger squadron. We woke up 4:30 am every day, saluted the flag, did physical training, showered, ate, attended classes, and learned the ways of the Air Force. Every day was highly scheduled and full of nonstop learning. We marched everywhere and had no free time. This was pretty much the schedule until week five, which is known as warrior week, when recruits packed up their belongings and headed out to tent city, where we learn to fight, survive, and teamwork. After warrior week finished we returned to our normal dormitory and prepared for graduation.

Effective leadership is critical to an organization's success. Organizations "seek those with leadership ability because they believe they bring special assets to their organizations, and ultimately, improve the bottom line" (Northouse, 2012, p. 1). Taking the educational system as one such organization allows the systematic study of leadership styles and their effect on what is arguably a school’s bottom line—student achievement. Thus, to improve student success, it is necessary to begin with an analysis of leadership styles within the education system.

For many years, people have wondered what makes a good leader. Is it the environment that they are born into or are they made into good leader, who knows. I believe that we cannot give a clear definition of what makes a leader. According to (Kinicki & Kreitner, 2009, p. 346) leadership is defined as “a social influence process in which the leader seeks the voluntary participation of subordinates in an effort to reach organizational goals. So what is my leadership style?

The leadership style combination between autocratic leadership and empowerment leadership would give the futuristic cutting edge per se, to create a diversified ultimate decision making policy. Autocratic leadership, which is a style that leaders who make decisions on their own without consulting employees enjoy and empowerment, which is a practice in which managers lead employees by sharing power, responsibility, and decision making with them (Boone, L. E., & Kurtz, D. L. 2009 p. 260-270). This mixture creates responsibility and accountability. If the leader is made to lead then, in return they will make certain key decisions based on experience, proven results and a “pocket” of advisors that will

Each individual possesses a certain capacity for leadership. Whether is is learned or innate, communication skills are a key factor in how a leader is perceived and followed. An individual’s leadership style is comprised of several factors within the workplace environment and the individuals that comprise it.Some theories debate whether leadership remains the same no matter the circumstance, where others maintain that individuals might use others to gain leadership for noble means. Regardless of the charisma or communication an individual uses in their leadership style, each person should follow the example of Christ to become a respectable, caring, and honorable role model of love and generosity.