Assessment Tool Analysis Submission

“A positive sense of wellbeing which

- Wellbeing is the condition or state of a human being, animal or plant. There are five types of wellbeing…

This also provides flexibility in the analysis of the responses. On the other hand, standardized questionnaire items often represent the least common denominator in assessing people’s attitudes, orientations, circumstances, and experiences. By designing questions that will be appropriate for all respondents, it is possible to miss what is most appropriate to many of the respondents (Babbie, 1992).

This tool is sponsored by the United Way of America. This tool is designed for United Way organizations but can be applied to nonprofits for internal evaluation purposes. This tool can be used to: (1) gauge your organization’s current status relative to the Standards of Excellence, (2) identify areas of strength where your expertise could be shared with others; and (3) determine where to focus your organizational development and improvement efforts (“United Way”, n.d.). This tool is marketed towards United Way organizations but can be applied to nonprofits for internal evaluation purposes.

In conclusion I think this assignment shows just how many different types and methods of assessment there are at your disposal within your

These assessment tools would make it much easier to gauge the mental state our patients are in when referencing stress level. It would give specific questions to ask about the patient’s current stress level and could be ice breakers into diving deeper into what’s going on with the patient and can be used as building blocks to help with the patient’s issues once and for all; or at least better equip them with coping skills. Using these assessment tools and other like them would equip the nursing staff with the tool needed to provider more holistic care to the patient which is synonymous with Watson’s Theory of caring.

In this paper on Watson’s theory of human caring it will briefly describe the theories background and concepts. In discussion of an actual nurse patient event I have had in Obstetrics it will analyze major theory assumptions related to person, health, nursing and environment in the context of this caring moment, along with a personal reflection of this caring moment.

to address the mental component of health. The World Health Organization has defined health as being the “physical, mental, and social well-being” of an individual (Breslow, 1972).

Wellbeing is ‘generally understood as the quality of people’s lives. It is a dynamic state that is enhanced when people can fulfil their personal and social goals. It is understood both in relation to objective measures, such as household income, educational resources and health status; and subjective indicators such as happiness, perceptions of quality of life and life satisfaction, (Statham and Chase 2010).’ It is important to acknowledge many factors play a role in measuring childhood well-being but it is necessary to look at both positive and negative indicators in orders to get a realistic overview as well as an overall understanding of well-being as a whole. Throughout the course of this essay both subjective and objective aspects of children’s well-being will be discussed as well as how the value of measuring both aspects can enable us to gain a holistic understanding of childhood well-being.

In society today, there is an extensive range of definitions of health and wellbeing which can be seen as both positive and negative. A Holistic view can also be identified and defined. These definitions of health have changed over time and will carry on changing within the future. According to where a family lives or their social class everyone will have different meanings and views of health and wellbeing. This may be due to what one person perceives as being healthy as another person may not. Channel 4 learning (no date) describes that a positive view of health can be seen as when a person is more likely to achieve and sustain physical fitness from exercising and are mentally stable. Therefor a negative view can be described when a

Bailey J. makes out that in adopting such an approach, it is necessary to extend the net so as to cover wider dimensions of well-being using non-conventional indicators of psychosocial and mental health, and environmental, relational and subjective components. In addition to this there should be an appropriate use of econometric and mathematical tools in order to quantify the variables.

Wellbeing is a multidimensional construct with several definitions and measures that can be grouped into two major categories, constructivist, and positivist. Constructivist framing is an individualistic and subjective aspect that focuses on life satisfaction and mental state of the individuals (Frydenberg, Care, Chan & Freeman, 2009). In contrast, the positivist framing considers economic and societal aspects, providing a more objective measurement of wellbeing (La Placa et al., 2013). However, if only one framework, constructivist or positivist, was used for analysis, it might be insufficient to describe the outcomes of wellbeing.

Another assumption is that the scales for measuring wellbeing change when circumstances change, this is a topic discussed by Brickman, Coates and Janoff-Bulman(1978) and by Oswald and Powdthavee

The Constitution of the World Health Organization (WHO) defines health as "A state of complete physical, mental, and social well-being not merely the absence of disease". It follows that the measurement of health and the effects of health care must include not only an indication of changes in the frequency and severity of diseases but also an estimation of wellbeing and this can be assessed by measuring the improvement in the quality of life related to health care. Although there are generally satisfactory ways of measuring the frequency and severity of diseases this is not the case in so far as the measurement of wellbeing and quality of life are concerned.

The Constitution of the World Health Organization (WHO) defines health as "A state of complete physical, mental, and social well-being not merely the absence of disease". It follows that the measurement of health and the effects of health care must include not only an indication of changes in the frequency and severity of diseases but also an estimation of wellbeing and this can be assessed by measuring the improvement in the quality of life related to health care. Although there are generally satisfactory ways of measuring the frequency and severity of diseases this is not the case in so far as the measurement of wellbeing and quality of life are concerned.