Banning Guns In America Research Paper

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed

The violence in the United States is a big issue, but making more gun laws is not the answer. It is an inevitable fact that making it harder to get access to guns would only lead people to turn to black markets and more underhanded deals. In an article for the Los Angeles Times, James Q. Wilson writes, “It is virtually impossible to use new background check or waiting-period laws to prevent dangerous people from getting guns. Those that they cannot buy, they will steal or borrow” (Wilson). Dramatic changes within gun controls laws would, in itself, make more people mad and possibly lead to riots. In many people's minds, more gun control laws would mean to taking guns away. Gun control laws within themself are not a bad thing, the extent to which they are taken within a nation

     “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”

The Second Amendment says “ A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”

The 2nd Amendment states that, “a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (Second Amendment).

“A Well Regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. (Brooks, 2013)”

On February 14th, at 2:19 pm, a boy arrived at Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida using an Uber ride. Everything deemed it to be a normal day at the school, until that boy triggered one of the biggest school shootings in US history, killing 17 and injuring another 17 people. That boy's name was Nikolas Cruz, age 19. Two years prior to this event, the boy was expelled from that same high school for threatening to assault teachers as well as threatening to shoot down the school. These school shootings have been happening all over the US, including the tragedy in Sandy Hook Elementary, on December 14th, 2012, when a shooter appeared at the school with one handgun and one assault rifle. That murderer killed 28 people ranging from ages 6 to 35. The masked killer´s name was Adam Lanza, age 20. Between 2007 and 2017, there have been 420 mass shootings in the US. There was even an emergency dismissal at our neighboring town, Staples High in Westport, due to a student who was thinking of executing a mass shooting. According to a poll in the Huffington Post, more than half of the US is inquiring, why are gun control laws so poorly structured in the US, and specifically, why are people able to buy assault

Sandy Hook elementary school shooting is a horrifying example of exactly how easily accessible guns can destroy innocent lives. Twenty young children were murdered on that day. Six teachers died trying to protect them and it was all down to one man. One man with a twisted mind and three guns he had taken from his own home was able to eliminate the future of twenty six people and break apart families forever.

Columbine, Virginia Tech, Sandy Hook, Pulse Night Club, and Las Vegas all have one thing in common. They all became household names after experiencing horrific mass shootings shocking Americans across the country. We hear of other tragic shootings almost daily and the question we hear the media asking is, “are guns the problem?” The debate over guns has been around since our country was founded. Our founding fathers felt it was so important that citizens have the right to protect themselves, that the right to bear arms is the second amendment in the constitution, making it a secure member of the Bill of Rights. Since this amendment was published and made law of the land, people have been debating its validity, especially in recent years. Our country seems divided with half the citizens blaming guns for mass shootings and the other half adamantly defending our right to own guns. While some people argue that guns are the cause of mass shootings in America, the Bill of Rights should be upheld for citizens to have their rights to bear arms for protection of our property and from a tyrannical government.

The Second Amendment to the U. S. Constitution states, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" (United States of America).

Guns have always been an increasing problem in our country. A lot of people use guns for hunting and other sports where guns are needed. There are also a lot of people who are using guns to kill or injure people. This has been a problem in the United States for many years. The gun control policies that the government has put into effect just flat out have not been working.

The United States of America is the leading country in gun manufacturing. In 2013 alone 11 million guns were produced and placed in markets for sell. Dylan roof a man with multiple arrests for trespassing and drug possession was able to pass a background check and was able to purchase a firearm from a gun shop. The 21 year old, later committed a hate crime murdering nine African Americans at a Charleston church in June 2015 (USA Today, 2015). This wasn’t the first nor the last time a shooting of such caliber has happened in the United States. The fact that purchasing a firearm is easier than ordering an item from another country is horrid. Something needs to be done to decrease such violence and keep the population safe from a madman with a gun. Having stricter gun laws

People die more than often to guns and kids are getting guns they shouldn’t have access to. For example the text states“Firearms are involved in the deaths of more than 30,000 people in the U.S. annually”(Issue Overview: Guns in America). This shouldn’t be happening and the government should be helping because innocent people are dying and they could prevent this. Moreover “The Uzi jumped back while she was firing and she accidentally shot Vacca in the head”(Fatal accident has nation asking: Why was a child allowed to fire an Uzi?By Los Angeles Times, adapted by Newsela staff09.01.14.They should know better because a little girl can’t handle an automatic weapon which is not safe.

Another motivation behind why handgun bans neglect to ensure individuals is on the grounds that they don't manage the main problem. The main problem behind handgun violations and savagery is not the handgun itself, yet rather the proprietor of the firearm. As indicated by reviews, starting 2010, there were approximately 300 million guns claimed by nationals in the United States. Of those 300 million, roughly 100 million were handguns, and 67% of those firearm proprietors said they had weapons for self-protection, 66% said they utilized their firearms for chasing, and 41% for target shooting (Agresti and Smith, 2010). Amid the year 2008, around 436,000 rough wrongdoings were conferred by an aggressor who was obviously conveying a weapon (Agresti

More and more frequently, we are saddened by the news of mass shootings. Whether it takes place in a school or public area, these shootings are both disastrous and mortifying. Families begin to feel anger and sadness, and demand immediate justice. Although these terrible events continue to happen, there have been no significant steps taken towards the reduction in the number of weapons; specifically assault rifles. This leads one to question do we need to ban the right to possess such weapons? If the possession of these weapons is not made illegal, we run the risk of another attack. While there is no questioning the severity of these mass shootings, a ban on assault rifles is not the answer because they are not the cause of such events,