Beat Patrol Vs Community Policing Analysis

Leadership style is an amalgamation of personality, skills, and behavior, which the leaders employ to motivate and interact with other people. However, it is prudent to note that leadership styles and theories have evolved over time and continued to change so that the issues on a broad spectrum can be resolved with respect to the current times. In a very similar manner, leadership styles in the law enforcement culture have also encountered various changes as problems over time have changed. Concerning the diverse leadership styles, transformational leadership is one essential theory to mention (Bass & Riggio, 2012).

The traditional style of policing required officers to focus on responding to call of service and solving crime in a reactive way. This meant citizen were giving zero input or cooperation when dealing with law enforcement. The traditional style of policing during the social unrest of the 1960 caused unwanted tension between citizens and police departments. This lead to the President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of justice in 1967. This commission challenged police departments across the country to be more responsive toward its citizens. Many department in the late 60’s and in the 70’s started to experiment with policing styles other than the traditional model. Departments moved on from the traditional model because

“Leadership plays a key role ensuring the achievement of desired outcomes in both formal and informal groups. Insufficient leadership in policing can result in significant negative consequences for agencies and their personnel.” (Schafer, 2009, p. 1). Having ethical leaders to follow and learn from is important in any career; especially law enforcement. An ethical leader will “create an environment that is conductive to dignified treatment on the job.” (Pollock, 2017, pg. 106). A strong leader will treat his subordinates fairly but be firm in his actions. He will let his subordinates learn from their mistakes as he provides them with constructive feedback and he will show them he cares about their future goals by teaching them the fundamentals

Community policing is one of the newer looks on law enforcement. Many people do not know exactly community policing is or how it works. It is used in many places around the world and has many elements needed to be successful. It varies from traditional policing with how they want to solve the problems in the community.

In order to deconstruct and demilitarize policing in the United States will require law enforcement to first establish a new culture of service and commitment to modernizing with emphasis on developing away from the paramilitary bureaucracy currently in place. This structure reaffirms the closed culture, thus maintaining the mindset that professional police officers are domestic soldier-bureaucrats rather than thinking professionals who make sound decisions rather than drones following orders of superiors (Stamper, 2005 p. 160). The advantages of moving away from the paramilitarism to the desirable community-policing model allow employees (officers) more autonomy in solving problems while also giving community stakeholders input is not the

The article presents interest crucial views on the legitimacy of community policing. The police have the responsibility of maintaining law and order in the society. For a long time, the task of ensuring law and order was left to the law enforcement department which had to rise to the occasion and prevent crime from occurring. However, as the crime rates and social disorders began to increase steadily, the local municipal leaders and other policymakers had to go to the drawing and devise new strategies that would improve the public safety management. Subsequently, this led to the community policing initiative being set. It is essential to note that community policing is a paradigm shift that emphasizes community cooperation in creating a secure and safe environment. In this arrangement, the people take active roles in the policing affairs and as such police are not seen as strangers who portray danger, but as a partner in maintaining law and order in the society. Even though there

INTRODUCCTORY SUMMARY: The Police Department proposes to implement a new community-based policing program for young men and women in police operations and law enforcement practices. The program will serve students from ages 18 to 21 years old. The recruited students will receive college credit for their participation in the program.

Community based policing can best be defined as, "a collaborative effort between the police and the community that identifies problems of crime and disorder and involves all elements of the community in the search for solutions to these problems" (Sykes). Community based policing is the role of the police not that of catching bad guys, but more that of helping the public. In order for community based policing to have an effect or benefit the role of the police officer has to have an active part in the community. Police departments have always looked to the community for help when it came to reporting a crime or help solving a crime. The point was to engage with the citizens and build a trust between the people and police so the community could once again feel safe and trust that police officers are there for them and working with them directly. Police must maintain a positive rapport to overcome all the negativity placed on officers." Strong, positive relationships between children and police officers often grow into

Growing up in the early to late two-thousands, I had not really given a thought as to why we need police past their promise “to serve and protect” as every squad car suggests. In reality, the idea of policing dates back to 1754 BC and has progressively changed into its modern form. Every police department has different goals as given in their mission statement or a written expression of a police department’s overall purpose and goals. However, they also share five common goals to aim for as they fulfill their promise “to serve and protect”. Five of those common goals are as follows:

In conclusion, policing is present in most communities, and it is effective with the assistance of the people within the neighbourhood. Everyone benefits with the appropriate relationship and the outcome. Many factors, both good and bad contribute to how police can better serve in the work they do and the work place they are present in.

Policing in the United States has mainly been based and expanded on the ideas of English way of policing. The English way of policing has not only been used as the basis for American policing but it has also been used to commence an era of evolving police agencies. In its early years, policing in the United States was largely regarded as a civic duty or responsibility of community members. The appointed officers were neither trained nor paid for their services to community members. Consequently, the chosen Sheriffs were usually motivated by financial incentives and lost their focus on enforcement of the law, which contributed to the perception that policing was primarily reactive in nature. However,

The police are usually charged with the great responsibility of ensuring that citizens are living quality lives that are free of crime and fear. In order to perform this duty effectively, the police need accurate and deeper knowledge of the citizens and issues they encounter in their daily lives. This knowledge will not be easy to come by if the police work independently from the citizens. Over the last several decades, police agencies have been working to gain the respect and the cooperation of the communities they serve. Community Oriented Policing was introduced to bring a closer working relationship between the citizens and the police.

Goldstein identified several concerns with modern law enforcement that problem-oriented policing sought to overcome. First was that professional policing’s focus on efficiency had reduced their effectiveness at dealing with problems. Second, agencies were reactive in nature. The focus on response to calls for service left little time for officers to engage in proactive policing strategies. Third, a major resource for law enforcement is the community itself but that partnerships between law enforcement and the community they serve had been severed. Fourth, the top down focus of police management did not provide for enough input from line officers and that their talent was largely going wasted. Fifth, the complexity of police organizations had not been properly recognized and that adjustments were needed for agencies to see greater success.

Police have the job of enforcing the law of the American government and they have many ways of policing the people and protecting them. However as with everything they are not perfect and these models of policing and have problems doing so. For example, the actions in Ferguson, Missouri show that the police may need new policies, and training to prevent further incidents like this in the future.

This English method also contributed three features: limited police authority, local control of the police agency, and a fragmented system of law enforcement (Walker, 1983). A fragmented system of law enforcement is very evident today. The United States currently has approximately 15,000 different police agencies. These individual police agencies are subject to little coordination with minimal national regulation (Walker, 1983).