There are several different ethical theories giving a decision maker a diverse way to make the best ethical decision. The author gives the readers multiple ways to consider a decision to prevent overlooking anyone or anything that has moral standing within the decision. To help explain the difference, we will use John Doe and his ethical decision he is faced with. John is a scientist and found a formula of unhealthy ingredients that taste just like sugar. He needs to decide whether or not to report this to his mass cookie-producing employer. First, John wants to use the identity-based approach of reasoning to help make this decision. This approach reflects on what the decision maker will become after executing his/her decision. John knows the ingredients are unhealthy for the human body, so deciding to use the recipe …show more content…
This approach does not take the consequences into consideration. The first theory under this method is duty-based. Meaning John must take in account of his obligation to the owners. John was hired to find a cheaper way to make the cookies and these ingredients are much cheaper than sugar. Therefore, it is his duty to report his findings to his employer. With that being said, John also needs to take the rights-based theory into account. The customers of John’s company have the right to know what is inside their cookies. However, the company tends to hide the unhealthy ingredients as “natural flavors”. John worries that the sleaziness of the company will manipulate the ingredient list preventing their customers their right to know the actual ingredients. The last of the principle-based approach is the justice-based theory. This theory is making sure everyone is being treated fairly within the decision’s moral standing. However, this theory does not pertain to John’s decision The last approach John should use is the consequence-based
It is important to look at ethical dilemmas in a systematic way, thus increasing the chance of achieving a solution that gives the best possible outcome. An ethical problem solving model taken from American sources (Paradise and Siegelwaks, 1982; Austin et al., 1990) was used to develop a six-step process to follow, in order to achieve this (Bond 2010, pg. 227). This process informs this paper, and I am in the role of counsellor.
Graham Tucker offers five-question approach for ethical decision-making. The model can be used to examine and challenge a proposed decision in order to reach a clear decision. All of the five questions should be asked to consider the proposed question. The answer should be positive for all of the five questions, and any negative answer means that the decision maker should review the proposed decision in order to reach an ethical decision (Cargill, 2006).
Apply the ethical decision making model presented in week one lectures (adapted from Beemsterboer, 2010; Velasquez et al, 2009) to the case study.
In society, individuals experience situations in which they tend to question whether their choices are ethical. In the article, “The Importance of Values and Cultures in Ethical Decision Making” by Christine Chimielewski, Chimielewski discusses the three principles which can help a person determine whether they are the good or bad choice. The three principles for making an ethical decision are “The Rule of Private Gain”, “Everyone Does It”, and “Benefits Versus Burden”. If a person is stuck in a situation where they’re indecisive about the choice, then the individual should look at the three principles. This article relates to the story, “Everyone Lives in a Flood Zone,” because of the main character, Jack finds himself in situations that he
Introduction An ethical dilemma exists when a moral decision must be made between two or more possible scenarios. It is defined as a situation requiring a person to take action or not to take action based on moral grounds (Braunack-Mayer, 2001). In business, such dilemmas occur frequently as employees, leaders, and organizations, are faced with complex problems that may impact multiple stakeholders in various ways that are not always equal or equitable. A sound ethical decision begins with a set of core values that define the person facing the situation (UC San Diego, 2014).
The first step of the Ethical Decision-Making Procedure is stated as, “1.0 Become Aware of Dilemma” (McNamara). According to the given case scenario, the dilemma is clearly stated. It reads that the client (mother) does not believe in rewards or support the use of them for her son. The mother is going against what the BCBA believes in and stands for, thus causing a direct dilemma. Removing reinforcers is not feasible for the professional BCBA, and this must be properly addressed with the client. Situations like these are where the Ethical Compliance Code comes into place for the sake of the clients and professionals involved.
Management constitute amongst major components of a company, organization or a business. As such, management oversees employees interactions with their supervisors and also control of people within a particular organization. Also, it includes critical and ethical decision-making process so as to address various ethical dilemmas experienced by employees while undertaking their respective assigned duties within the company. Ethical dilemmas are hereby to stay as issues usually arise now and then and place a variety of options that bear different repercussions. Therefore, it calls for ethical and critical decision-making skills so as to make the most appropriate option that bears more benefits in comparison to other options presented. While making ethical decisions, it 's substantially important to play heed to a certain ethical decision-making theory. This would enable an individual making the decision to ripe best possible consequences rather than living to regret. Moreover, ethical decision making is typically important in business as making a wrong decision may result not only in huge losses but also poor relationship amongst colleagues and miserable life for employee(s) working in a particular company or business in question.
In the framework established by McDonald (2001), he asks the decision maker to consider how these moral factors can help to contribute to an alternative action, as well as shedding a light on what makes the situation in ethical dilemma.
Purpose: To make an effective decision, it is vital to follow the basic groundwork in the ethical decision making process. It is a nine step process that will yield better results, when making choices. Many organizations adopt the ethical decision making process to prevent decisions that are influenced by emotions, and one’s personal gain. The NCAA is an organization that utilizes the ethical decision making process to accommodate athletes, personnel, and universities.
First and foremost, you need to identify the problem consider the significant of the contact and setting. We know she at a wine tasting she’s may be already drunk. She needs to be able to identify and utilize ethical and logical resources. she would need to stay calm consider the possible solutions to the problem at hand. And also consider the potential consequences of his actions. We already know he is acting aggressive with her by implying that he will tell the court “she is out to get him “the next step would be to make sure you have assessed the outcome and Implement changes if needed.
Making consistently ethical decisions is difficult. Most decisions have to be made in the context of economic, professional and social pressures, which can sometimes challenge our ethical goals and conceal or confuse the moral issues. In addition, making ethical choices is complex because in many situations there are a multitude of competing interests and values. Other times, crucial facts are unknown or ambiguous. Since many actions are likely to benefit some people at the expense of others, the decision maker must prioritize competing moral claims and must be proficient at predicting the likely consequences of various choices. An ethical person often chooses to do more than the law requires and less than the law allows.
We all end up at a point where we have to respond to an issue positively. That is possible when a good amount of experience to certain situations is attained. “The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals 'utility' or the 'greatest happiness principle' holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” - John Stuart Mill. This particular quote refers to the utilitarian approach which states that in all our actions we must always strive to produce the greatest possible balance of good or evil. The utilitarian
Decision making then leads to two kinds of choices. An ethical decision which is characterized as a choice that is both legitimate and morally satisfactory to the organization and an unethical choice which is either unlawful or morally inadmissible to the organization (Jones 1991, p.367).
Nurses often encountered various ethical dilemmas in the practice setting. Both virtue ethics and caring ethics support good ethical decision making for nurses (Park, 2012, p. 149) but these are inadequate to assist in solving an ethical dilemma (Park, 2012, p. 149). For that reason an ethical decision making tool is helpful for the nurses or clinicians to come up with an ethical decision (Kelly, 2012, p. 571) that allows them to gather information, identify any gap of understanding on the issue or the disagreements between the involved parties through a clear communication (Park, 2012, p. 140). Several authors presented an ethical decision making processes (Park, 2012, p. 141), here presented the two processes that can be applied in resolving an ethical dilemma. One example of ethical decision making process is the DECIDE model by Thompson, Melia & Boyd (Allen, Chapman, Francis, & O’Connor, 2008, p. 5) and the Integrated ethical decision-making model which was derived from the combination of the different ethical decision-making models strengths (Park, 2012, p. 140). These two ethical decision-making model steps are identical to each but differ on the detailed instruction on how the steps are to be done or used in actual case. By comparing the two models the integrated ethical decision-making model have a detailed instruction. The
(Angelo Kinicki, 2015) There are four approaches to deciding ethical dilemmas; utilitarian approach is guided by what will result in the greatest good for the greatest number of people. The individual approach is guided by what will result in the individual’s best long term interests. The moral-right approach is guided by respect for the fundamental rights of human beings. Last the justice approach is guided by respect for impartial standards of fairness and equity. These approaches can be used by companies. They can help and provide guidelines for companies when faced with ethical dilemmas, this provides an alternative method.