Best Practice Initially explored by Jeffery Pfeffer in 1998 (Leatherbarrow et al, 2010, p. 59), the best practice model of SHRM can be described as a number of specific HR practices that are universal and have the potential to bring about enhanced performance for all organisations (Marchington and Wilkinson, 2006, p. 72). Alternatively, known as a universalistic perspective, the model is recognised to give superior outcomes, whatever the situation (Delery and Doty, 1996). It integrates horizontally where practices are supported jointly. Over the years, various academics have scrutinised this area and subsequently identified and published their own set of ‘best practices’. Ultimately, these studies recommend that their sets of HR practices can assist in better staff performance, improved staff retention, reduce absenteeism, which can increase efficiency and quality in the company. Pfeffers’ Practices The best-known and universally accepted practices are those published by Pfeffer in 1998 (Armstrong, 2009) which are: Pfeffers’ Practice Description 1 Employment security and internal labour markets This supports his 6 other practices by offering job security in return for hard work and commitment to the company. 2 Selective hiring and sophisticated selection Recruiting, selecting and then retaining the best people can lead to gaining a competitive advantage 3 Extensive training, learning and development Organisations need to ensure that they retain the best people. 4
Developing a recruitment and selection process with high standards is what will result in attaining personnel capable of amplifying excellence, which is the first step of the second principle, known as raising the bar. “Regardless of whether the company is large or small, hiring the best and brightest employees lays a strong foundation for excellence”
In response to criticisms of the ‘best fit’ and ‘best practice’ approaches, the ‘resource based view’ model focuses on leveraging competitive advantage through both tangible and intangible organisational resources. However, questions arise regarding whether there is a best way of achieving strategic HRM. Evidence suggests that firms rarely adopt a single style of management and that it is likely that they use a mix of approaches for different groups (Wilton 2011).
The issue with many companies today is that their organizations put tremendous effort into attracting employees to their company. The process of attracting and retaining profitable employees, as it is increasingly more competitive between firms and of strategic importance, has come to be known as the war for talent.
The Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) is the largest expert alliance committed to human resource management in the world. The main objective of the foundation is
Wright and McMahan (1994) define strategic HRM as “the pattern of planned Human Resource deployments and activities intended to enable the organisation to achieve its goals.” A HR function should impact the success of an organisation; a policy must remain current and suitable to both the internal and external environment. Ulrich and Lake (1990) affirm, ‘HRM systems can be the source of organisational capabilities that allow organisations to learn and capitalise on new opportunities.’
Using the CHRM Decision-Making Framework, consider an organisation’s actual or potential SHRM response to influential factors and link them to the organisation’s internal HRM.
The topic I chose to research and discuss is the topic of recruiting and retaining the best employees. I chose this subject because I felt it was important for an employer trying to compete in this very competitive business environment, no matter what the business is, to be able not only hire the best and most qualified employees but retain them and keep them motivated. The ability to distinguish the difference between high performing employees and lower performing employees can be detrimental to a company’s success or failure. In retrospect, this goes back to recruiting and retaining the best employees while avoiding and being able to let go of those of a weaker caliber. Before an organization can thrive in recruitment and retention,
CRITICALLY COMPARE AND CONTRAST THE 'BEST FIT', 'BEST PRACTICE' AND 'RESOURCE-BASED VIEW', MODELS OF HRM STRATEGY AND EXPLAIN HOW EACH APPROACH IS ARGUED TO CONTRIBUTE TO IMPROVED ORGANISATIONAL PERFORMANCE.
The "best-fit" approach questions the universality assumption of the best-practice perspective. It emphasizes contingency fit between HR activities and the organization's stage of development, an organization's internal structures and its external environment like clients, suppliers, competition and labour markets (Redman and Wilkinson 2009). HR policy should be minted by the appropriate context of individual employees and therefore support the overall competitive strategy. Aligning HRM practices to strategies can enable companies to create potential competitive advantages (Schuler and Jackson 1987 in Redman and Wilkinson 2009).
Finally, remember that attracting and keeping the right people happens not as a result of strategy – but
According to its proponents, the ‘best practice’ school of thought is the route to organizational success. If that is the case, why is ‘best practice’ not standard HR practice within all organizations? Proper management of human resources is a critical variable affecting an organization’s growth, competitiveness, productivity, profitability, and survival. The core strength of any organization lies in its human resources because it involves all management decisions and practices that directly affect or influence the organization, especially the organization’s workforce. Organizations do not exist without people, hence people are the most significant resources in an organization. General human resource management (HRM) practices emphasize
The integrative model of human resource SHRM includes elements of both the control-based and the resource-based SHRM. Desired outcome dictates the elements that will be employed. HR policies can employ elements of commitment, collaboration, traditional and paternal control as needed to support its business strategy. Commitment strategies seek and develop internal talents to meet skill needed. Employees are seen as business partners and competitive advantage agents. Traditional HR and collaborative HR strategies have elements of externally acquiring physical resource or skills. External recruiting in the case of traditional HR strategy and subcontracting and hiring of consultants as part of the collaborative strategy can be used to provide competitive advantages to firms. External talents while providing short term advantages can be a disadvantage in the long term due to cost and potential threat to the firm business. The paternalistic HR strategy provides rewards for employees who learn and follow the company prescriptive directive for success.
With the acquiring of quality employees comes the assessment and development of Human Resources. Having the right people for the job is just selecting the right people to
The research done in this proposal attempts to find the role of Human Resources Management for the smooth running of an organization through effective implementation of HRM strategies. HRM today has a much broader range of functions than traditionally it use to have over a decade ago. HR manager also has a lot of
As the world is turning out to be more aggressive and unstable than any other time in recent memory, producing based enterprises are looking to increase upper hand at all cost and are swinging to more inventive sources through HRM practices (Sparrow, Schuler, & Jackson, 1994). HR practices has been defined by (Smallbusiness.chron.com, 2016) as “the means through which your human resources personnel can develop the leadership of your staff.”