Book Report in Micheal Pollan´s Book

1. David Freedman sets out to disprove that processed foods are inherently bad for you; counter arguing what Michael Pollan advocates. Freedman’s set out to prove to the readers that the praise wholesome, organic food receives, and the bashing that processed junk food receives, might not be entirely true. The author argues against Michael Pollan’s opinion on processed food. To do this, he uses a combination of his personal experiences, including in both Whole Foods and Trader Joe, and date he has derived from his experiences in said stores.

Over the last several decades, the diet of society has been continually changing. This has resulted in different formulas for nutrition and the proper portions of foods that must be consumed. To fully understand the various arguments requires looking at numerous viewpoints. This will be accomplished by focusing on Michael Pollan's Escape from the Western Diet in contrast with Mary Maxfield's Food as thought: Resisting the Moralization of Eating. These views will highlight how diet and nutrition is based upon individual opinions. This is the focus of the thesis.

He probes them to learn the what, where, and how of dinner – knowing what is going into the body, knowing where that food came from, and knowing how that food was made. By first knowing what is being consumed, people can make better informed decisions about their purchases. Nutrition, or lack thereof, is a key component in the battle against obesity. Food giants are hoping to hide the often unnecessary filler present in their products by use of dodgy claims and socially engineered advertisements. In general, most consumers probably couldn’t say where their food came from. This usually boils down to the fact that shoppers typically don’t think about it. Breaking this reliance on mass-grown foods is the second part of Pollan’s proposition. The third and equally important element is how the food is produced. More specifically, Pollan is concerned whether or not the food has been produced in a sustainable manner. Preserving the biodiversity of food, maintaining fertile land for future generations, and ensuring consumers receive food that does not compromise health are all factors of sustainability. Without informed consumers, what, where, and how will continue to be unanswered questions. Whether it is for nutritional or ethical choices, a particular food’s history is something that needs to once again become common

In his book, Pollan first sets the stage by delineating the eating habits changes in 1970s and 2000s. He then emphasizes the relationship between food and culture, and the contraction between French paradox and American paradox further illuminates his perspective. Pollan soon outlines the concept of omnivore’s dilemma as well as strengthens his viewpoint that American eating disorder is caused by lack of a stable cultural tradition. To more completely demonstrating his belief, he classifies the four meals into three principal food chains, the industrial, the organic, and the hunter-gather. At the end, he states this book is about the pleasures of knowing your own eating, and urges

In Pollan’s “Voting with Your Fork,” he first develops a controversial question by examining the food we eat, the production of food, and the health consequences. Pollan counterbalances his argument on food, and health being manipulated by the food industry by providing supporting evidence and expressing his opinion on the issue. Pollan identifies in his article that as the food industry produces cheaper food the unhealthier the food becomes. Pollan explanation to cheap food is, “While it is true that this system produces vast quantities of cheap food (indeed, the vastness and cheapness is part of the problem), it is not doing what any nation’s food system foremost needs to do: that is, maintain its population in a good health.” In increasing the consumption of cheap food, can result in lethal health problems. “For most of history, the food problem” has been a problem of quantity. Our shocking rates of obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, foodborne illness and nutrient deficiency suggest that quantity is not the problem- or the solution.” The purpose of Pollan’s article was to trigger society to acknowledge the food being consumed, the production of cheap food, and how certain foods can lead to negative health consequences. In comparison to Pollan, Konstantinovsky also used an argument of facts to state her claims as to why

In part the reason why the books is so compelling is because Pollan states upfront his own short comings with cooking. He also puts things into prospective of the reader in a way that even the least experienced cook can relate to his experiences. He composes his book into four parts which reflect the four masters who teach him their art form of choice. These are broken down into the four elements: fire, water, air, and earth. In the first portion of the book, Fire, he learns the techniques behind cooking a whole hog over a fire. The second portion, Water, he learns how to cook pot dishes like stews, soups, and braises. The third portion, Air, he learns how to make bread from home started yeast and bacteria. The last portion, earth, is where he learns about the fermentation

Michael Pollan the author of Omnivore 's Dilemma discusses and asks, “what should we have for dinner?” He attempts to answer one of the pressing questions of sustainability in today 's society, to save money or to save the planet, and how? Pollan talks about how humans are omnivores and we have the choice to eat whatever we want, no matter the health and sustainability implications of our decisions. Pollan discusses three main food chains, industrial (corn), organic, and hunter/gatherer. He analyzes each food chain, learning eating industrial is basically eating corn, and goes into the complex issues

One does not necessarily expect books about food also to be about bigger ideas like oppression, spirituality, and freedom, yet Pollan defies expectations. Pollan begins with an exploration of the food-production system from which the vast majority of American meals are derived. This industrial food chain is mainly based on corn, whether it is eaten directly, fed to livestock, or processed into chemicals such as glucose and ethanol. Pollan discusses how the humble corn plant came to dominate the American diet through a combination of biological, cultural, and political factors. The role of petroleum in the cultivation and transportation the American food supply is also discussed. A fast-food meal is used to illustrate the end result of the

The first section of this book traces a meal at McDonalds back to its basic ingredient-corn. From the corn that feeds the chickens to the xanthan gum in the milkshake to the sweetener in the ketchup and oil in which the fries are cooked, McDonalds is mostly corn. Since Fast Food Nation and the other exposes, I don’t think there’s anyone who cares who doesn’t know how gross fast food is, and Pollan admirably stays away from the yuckiest. Instead, he goes to accusing Americans who eat food of having become like koalas, capable of absorbing

To address what distinguishes the food of a western diet, Pollan compares whole foods and processed foods. He quotes Gyorgy Scrinis and concludes to himself “instead of worrying about nutrients, we should simply avoid any food that has been processed to such an extent that it is more the product of industry than nature (Pollan, 438). Pollan agrees with Scrinis for avoiding processed foods, but he complicates it by mentioning that all whole foods are taken over by industrial processes. Again Pollan reminds the reader that escaping the western diet will not be simple,

Michael Pollan's In Defense of Food: An Eater's Manifesto is an eye-opening analysis of the American food industry and the fear driven relationship many of us have with food. He talks in depth about all the little scientific studies, misconceptions and confusions that have gathered over the past fifty years. In the end provide us with a piece of advice that should be obvious but somehow is not, "Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants." He follows the history of nutritionism and the industrialization of food, in hopes to answer one question….. how and when "mom" ceded control of our food choices to nutritionists, food marketers and the government.

“The solution, in his view, is to replace Big Food’s engineered, edible evil—through public education and regulation—with fresh, unprocessed, local, seasonal, real food.” (Freedman). Pollan has increased spite for “nutritionism,” which is the idea behind packing healthier ingredients into processed foods which is what Freedman is advocating for. Pollan’s view is much the same as some scientists, food activists, nutritionists, and celebrity chefs. He has had such an influence that the Silicon Valley caters to the wholefoods movement and the progression to familiarizing the masses with simpler eating habits (Freedman). However, being an area full of technological endeavors, the Silicon Valley sees technology as the culprit as well. The New York Times Magazine’s food writer, Mark Bittman also shares views with Pollan. In fact, Bittman has even written a cookbook on how to eat better. While most are more wholesome there are still few recipes that are high in fat. One of his recipes consists of corn being sautéed in bacon fat and then topped with bacon (Freedman).

When Michael Pollan's book The Omnivore's Dilemma was published, many readers began questioning him for advice on what they should eat in order to stay healthy. In his more recent book, In Defense of Food, he responds with three rules, "Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants"(Pollan 1). This seven word response seems too simple for a relatively complicated question, but as he further elaborates these rules into specific guidelines, this summary turns out to be surprisingly complete. Using inductive and deductive reasoning, he debunks the ideas behind nutritionism and food science, and proves that the western diet is the cause for food related diseases. Inductive reasoning is when a

Michael Pollan was born on February 6, 1955 in Long Island, New York. His mother Corky Pollan had two kids including himself with Stephen Pollan. Stephen Pollan was a financial consultant and Corky Pollan was journalist. Michael Pollan went to Bennington college and got his bachelor’s in english. Then transferred to Columbia university and got his master’s in english.

The essay “Eat Food: Food Defined,” from Michael Pollan’s 2008 book In Defense of Food was written to address the American general public about the food industry. Pollan focuses on relatable topics as examples, such as family, common food items, and common belief that everyone wants to be healthy. The essay brings across Pollan’s point by establishing his credibility, explaining why this is important to us, and telling us how to react to the given facts. Pollan makes the readers inquire how we define food by drawing our attention to the importance of examining our food before eating it.