Business experience for a seat in Congress The United States is now close to electing its new President and this raises new challenges and issues to be assessed by analysts and the media. One important example in this sense is represented by the skills and experience which need to be possessed by the political candidate in order for them to be able to adequately complete their operations. Whereas there are some skills which help win votes, such as charm and charisma, the technical skills of the candidates should account for more. And these criteria would be obvious at the level of all political candidacies, including the fight for a seat in Congress. At this specific level, a question is being posed relative to the need for the candidates to Congress to possess business skills. And the provision of an answer to this question is a difficult endeavor, with at least two stand points. On the one hand, business can be perceived as a difficult subject, taught and learned in specially designed educational institutions, and acquired through years of professional involvement. From this standpoint then, the business knowledge should now be perceived as an absolute necessity or its absence should not be perceived as a weakness for a candidate. The future position of the Congress member may not even be related to business operations, and the candidate might be a highly skilled and capable individual, with the ability to excel in their specific domain, different from business.
Simply watching a candidate performing a task would not necessarily reflect their knowledge in other areas, for example regarding legislation. In this case a more effective assessment method should be included, such as questioning.
Mayhew examines the congressmen activity in Washington that is useful to engage in for the purpose of reelection. The first activity is advertising, defined by making a conscious effort to disseminate one’s name in a positive light among constituents to gain a favorable view. They emphasize personal qualities such as:
The recent election of 2016 shows that artifice is essential in winning voters. Donald Trump, throughout his campaign, displayed an image of himself that people would perceive as “tough” and “strong”. The image of Trump as a reality TV star made him more likable by Americans. Trump spoke openly to people's economic stress, cultural fears and the disillusion with politicians. He promised to “bring
The candidate should also be able to build and delegate a team. If the selection committee hires somebody who is over-dependent on others, like a mentor of some sort, success would be out of the question. The candidate should also be able to circumvent from too much power as he will be prone to abusing it. He should convert his power to influence others but not to exploit them.
The depth and quality of knowledge used by policy makers can influence the effectiveness of policies. According to Milakovich and Gordon, competitive political forces constantly push elected representatives to focus on immediate political decisions, rather than on long term professional-administrative values such as efficient use of resources and increased productivity (p.431). During President Bush’ election he used certain failures of the past administration to enhance his win to presidency as the public trust in the
Throughout the course of American politics, superstar senators have risen from the frameworks of capitol buildings on federal, state, and local levels. Some were ruthlessly manipulative in their desire to achieve success, choosing to push their own agenda for the sake of a spot in history. Others served a more earnest cause, putting their country before their party. From the founding fathers to post World War II America, senators of the extremely partisan kind worked in Washington, these men certainly were not the last of the “cut throat” politicians, their actions setting a precedent for future men and women in their partisan agenda. However, noble men who worked endlessly for the prosperity, safety, and unity of America are often swept
Throughout American History, people expect those who run for president to fully understand the occupation and its role as president and the importance of soliciting their votes. During each election, America assumes that each candidate will thoroughly explain their positions and their values so that the people can become familiar with the candidate and begin to trust them. Over time, the way presidential candidates promote themselves to America continued to evolve in many different ways that connect more with people on a nation wide level. Also, each president has a role they must follow. They are expected to understand the qualifications of a president and its powers in position so they can truly be in running as the Chief Executive of the United States of America. Moreover, new ways of publicizing the campaigns, have become a major role in understanding each candidate. With that being said, strategizing and campaigning have changed dramatically as new technology was introduced. In early America, the presidents were limited to its abilities as laws were new and not concrete. Once the U.S. developed into its truest form, the government realized its strengths and weakness. While overcoming many obstacles in the colonies in the early times of America, then later being a whole nation as one, the government created a unique governmental system that included regulations for the president in order to keep America united and tranquil. In the early times of this nation, voting
The results of both the 2004 and 2012 Presidential elections were the same as both incumbents were able to capitalize on the voters being comfortable with them. Additional, since both incumbents had access to national assets, four years of on the job training, and “insider information” they were able to speak in-depth on a wide range of issues both foreign and domestic. In 2004, the largest and most important issue to the nation was the war in Iraqi and in 2012 it was the nation’s economy. Given the incumbents access to firsthand information on the issues at large, they were able to weaken their opponents in the nation’s eyes by dismantling the candidate’s strategies on the issues. History has shown that nations trend to focus more on domestic
With most of my career having been spent in government, my strongest characteristic is my ability to effectively communicate and cultivate a strong rapport with policy makers. I understand the
Does him knowing how to manage a business automatically make him more qualified? Krugman states “Does business success carry with it the knowledge and instincts needed to make good economic policy? No, it doesn’t.” The answer is no, it doesn’t make him more qualified than Hillary. Krugman also says “But while we haven’t had many business leaders in the White House, we do know what kind of advice prominent businessmen give on economic policy.
The depth and quality of knowledge used by policy makers can influence the effectiveness of policies. According to Milakovich and Gordon, competitive political forces constantly push elected representatives to focus on immediate political decisions, rather than on long term professional-administrative values such as efficient use of resources and increased productivity (p.431). During President Bush’ election he used certain failures of the past administration to enhance his win to presidency as the public trust in the
As people around the world progress more and more they begin to question the capability and qualification of their leaders, whether it be the President of The United States or the governor of a local county. The question of what makes them an educated leader, whether it be their qualities or credentials, has been asked for years but what makes them what they are in the new twenty-first century. There are many things that can make or break whether people believe them to be capable of the job that they hold onto at that moment and this sort of opinion can change as quickly as night turns to day. Three questions that can be answered in accordance are who determines the qualities of an educated leader, to whom do we look to guidance in evaluating an educated leader, and what sort of qualification and qualities does and educated leader possess?
Business is a source of economic growth globally as it plays a massive role to increase the national income. As a result the government works hard to exploit the human ability perfectly by supporting them financially and giving them the training and technical help they need. There are many names have achieved success in business such as Walt Disney and Larry page. Walter Elias is an American media businessman. He had worked actively since 1920-1966. The company, parks, animation studio are the real wealth which inherited by Disney. The second businessman is Lawrence is an American expert in computer science and internet .he is an Executive Chairman of google company .He completed his education and he graduated with high degree of science in computer engineering. His net worth nearly about
Must be having good knowledge of mass media of communication and high decision making ability to choose for the best alternative.