Case Study 1 = Dakz Performance Sports Apparel Module 2: Understanding the external environment (External Environment – everything external to the organisation including but not limited to: Industries, Markets, Political Forces, Regulations, Environmental Issues, Society, Technology and a variety of other factors) Q1 – Define Industry and advise about Dakz performance spots apparel Industry Definition (The grouping of similar economic or commercial activities that produce goods or services) Page 2.5 Dakz Performance sports apparel is into global athletic apparel and footwear industry. Dakz started making compression apparel for triathletes, before quickly diversifying into small production runs of cycling and runin clothes …show more content…
There is little expertise required to enter into athletic apparel but require highly specialized knowledge for category of compression apparel. Dakz has started business from very small that attract new entrants as well. Buyer Power is high :- Buyer have alternative channels for products and have many brands to choose are easily able to compare price due to the availability of information on internet and in supermarkets. Substitute power is low : - Dakz is making compression apparel for triathletes and other athletic apparel for athletes and active Australians. Usually athletes do not other clothes as substitutes other than athletic apparel so we can easily say substitute power is low. Supplier power is low :- Due to availability of other international brands in market, supplier power is low. Daks has 40% of market share in Australian and can be easily influence suppliers for not increasing raw material price. Industry Rivalry is high:- Due to continuously increase in demand since 2008, Industry rivalry is high. Price competitiveness drive rivalry. Availability of other international brands, no such barriers on new entrants ad continuous growth in demand of athletic goods pushes price competitiveness. So we can easily say that industry rivalry is high. Summary – Overall we can say demand of athletic goods will increase but if Dakz want to
David Jones’ position in the retail industry and the availability of numerous suppliers in the market reduces the threat of forward integration. Suppliers also want to be associated with David Jones due to its strong brand position in Australia. In 2008, 50 new iconic brands were introduced to David Jones portfolio (Annual report, 2008), which reflects the willingness of suppliers to add their products in David Jones’ product offerings.
In the athletic apparel industry, as in any industry, it is key to stay in touch with the current trends in order to keep your products relevant. With Lululemon focused on such a niche activity it will be important that they explore other markets within the sports apparel industry in the future so as to stay relevant. We can see the company’s first steps in doing just this when they recently introduced their men’s apparel line. A summary of the athletic apparel industry’s external environment are listed in Exhibit 1.
The Bargaining Power of Suppliers (Moderate): Most of the industry’s products are sourced and manufactured by a network of third parties. The supplier group is diluted compared to the industry; KMD alone has over 45 suppliers. There is credible threat of suppliers adopting forward integration resulting in loss of major suppliers and emergence of new competitors for the industry. Highly effective and specialised products will pose high supplier switching costs for industry firms.
Bargaining Power of Suppliers: The bargaining power of suppliers in the industry is low. There are numerous suppliers in this industry, and the large department stores have the ability to negotiate for the lowest prices. In addition, the switching costs are low, as the products are not highly differentiated. There are a large volume of purchases in the industry, allowing the department stores to exert even more power over the suppliers.
Bargaining power of supplier: High levels of competition among suppliers act to reduce prices to producers. This is a positive for Ford Motor Company. Standardization of parts allowed Ford to reduce dependency on fixed supplier/vendor which goes into producer’s favor.
A newcomer is going to have to build its way up the same way all the famous sporting goods brands have done it. Under Armour, Nike and Adidas/Reebok are aware of the possibility of new entrants in the market and that is why they keep advertising, establishing distribution channels, making marketing agreements, and keeping up brand loyalty in their customers.
The suppliers get the advantages of making their products be showcased for the consumers thru these retailing outlets. A wider scope of retail outlets could mean wider scope for the brand recognition of the seller’s products, that is why these retailing giants has more power than suppliers. But when it comes to distribution, having a strong supplier is important, the company be better over competitors when it comes to qualitative factors such as on time deliveries on their branches and wider network of
Suppliers have less power because there are a lot of suppliers and they all willing to accommodate and provide discounts for their customers (economies of scale).
In 1995 the then captain of the University of Maryland football team, Kevin Plank came up with a brilliant idea that will revolutionize the athletic apparel industry forever: microfiber T-shirts designed to wick moisture away from the skin. Almost two decades later, Under Armour is a multi billion-dollar athletic apparel market competing directly with industry giants Nike and Adidas.
Sport Apparel is a large industries with many firms such as Nike, Adidas, Reebok, Under Armour, the Gap, Athleta, Nordstrom, Lucy and Bebe store. Large industries allow multiple firms and producers to prosper without having to steal market share from each other. Large industry size is a positive for Lululemon Athletica. … This qualitative factor will lead to an increase in costs.
Supplier Power: This highlights that it is easy for suppliers to rise up their prices. This is determined by the number of suppliers, the uniqueness of their product, their control over the buyer, and the cost of changing from one buyer to another. The scarcer the supplier choices you might have, and the more you need the help and that
As shown in Figure 2 of the Appendix, a Porter Five Force Analysis makes it clear that the overall rivalry within the athletic apparel industry is medium to high. Because Nike and Adidas already have a substantial amount of capital resources and other assets, Under Armour struggles against them to gain market share. 8Also, private labels of retailers and newer sports apparel companies could potentially pose a threat to Under Armour, but mostly due to the fact that Under Armour does not hold any fabric or process patents. This makes it extremely easy for any competitor to duplicate a product or process with no consequence. However, the threat of new entrants is not too troublesome within the industry because of the great capital cost required for branding, advertising, and meeting product demand. Furthermore, the sports apparel industry is in the maturity phase of the industry life cycle. This means that each company included in the oligopoly must
Under Armour, Inc. is an American sports clothing and Accessories Company. The company is a supplier of sportswear and casual apparel. Under Armour began offering footwear in 2006.
A supplier group have even more power over an industry if it is dominated by a few companies, there are no substitute products, the industry is not an important consumer for the suppliers, their product is essential to the industry, the supplier differs costs, and forward integration potential of the supplier group exists. Labor supply can also influence the position of the suppliers. These factors are generally out of the control of the industry or company but strategy can alter the power of
Athletic goods industry still has unlimited potential and it is a growing industry at the moment. The sportswear is not limited to track and field anymore. It has become a daily-life goods that can be seen everywhere. Product diversification into fashion business opens up a new growth potential for athletic goods.