Camels Cigarette Ad And A Cdc Ad ( Centers For Disease Control And Prevention )

Tobacco ads have stood out to me from a young age, I was used to seeing cigarette ads in every magazine and street corner. When I was 11 I joined a tobacco advocacy group, I wanted to inform young people my age about the dangers of tobacco but mostly I joined because they paid me. I found these two ads and I remembered sitting in an empty classroom analyzing tobacco ads and discussing how they appeal to us. I found two ads, both from the most recent issue of a popular celebrity gossip magazine. The first major difference one notices is that of the ads is catered to a completely different audience. Blu E-cigarettes cater to the new age of tobacco consumers. While Newport menthol cigarettes are tried and tested, a classic. The major differences in this ad make it difficult to pick which one is most effective at getting more buyers of their product. Newport’s ad is

39.My overall impression of the Camel’s cigarette ad is surprised that the doctor would be the ne smoking even though how bad it was for your health. Also they never had any real statistics in the ad.

According to Action on Smoking and Health (ASH), 36.5 million Americans currently smoke, that is about fifteen percent of the population which is equal to the combined population of America’s twenty-five largest cities. Although anti-smoking advertisements are shown throughout the United States, people do not take them seriously half the time. The advertisement in this analysis showcases a grayish background, with the colors focusing mainly on a cigarette box that has the cigarettes put into crayon labels and the box also opens like a crayon box. There is also a child’s writing with crayons saying, “Just like mommy.” From this, the image showcases the dangers of smoking and the causes it has on loved ones. This advertisement uses strong ethos, pathos, and logos to get ASH’s point across very clear.

Although tobacco advertisements are banned, people still consume it. The ban started in 1971 and since then has become even more strict on the sponsoring and promotion of tobacco brand logos. Now, all tobacco ads used, dissuade users from consuming. Advertisements in general can be obnoxious and tiresome, but they are sometimes necessary for the seller to get their point across. Ads are either trying to get money from the consumer or driving to change a person’s mind positively. The main reasoning for the creation of advertisements is to persuade the viewer or audience through the evocation of ethos, pathos, and logos, to have a change of mind about the product. The ads I chose are both similar, but have different goals towards their audience.

Commercials are used to target a wide variety of audiences and the television is the perfect way to do so, however this particular commercial is targeting a much more specific audience. Its main audience is teens and young adults. We know this for many reasons; one is the teens in the classroom. Another is the use of a hideous creature to represent the cigarettes. Teens who may be in the situation to choose to smoke or using smokeless tobacco will see these visual representations of what they are putting into their bodies and turn the other way. Another possible audience could be adults and parents. They are less

Throughout this, the advertisement will reveal the danger of smoking cigarettes and promote smokers to quit. The ad was created to invoke a response from its audience which is smokers and non-smokers. In the non-smoking audience, the ad will try to decrease their compulsion to smoke. After witnessing the anti-smoking commercial and seeing the harmful health conditions former smokers are in, non-smokers shouldn’t want to be in that position. Others may feel as if this ad doesn’t concern them because they don’t smoke or it has little to no effect on their lives. This group may also feel that this video should convince smokers to want to quit, but it’s most likely not the case. To smokers, the image will only remind them of what harm they’re doing to their bodies. Smokers would also become apathetic to the commercial because they’re already informed about the consequences and addiction of smoking. Smokers may also look at the advertisement as a personal attack simply because smoking is viewed as such a bad thing in the United

The ad was distributed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). A federal agency that conducts and supports health promotion, prevention and preparedness activities in the United States with the goal of improving overall public health. Established in 1946 and based in Atlanta, the CDC is managed by the Department of Health and Human Services. In their commercials CDC uses real life stories to portray the effects of smoking cigarettes. My ad will be focusing on former smoker Terrie Hall.

Smoking is one of the most controversial topics in the world, the cigarette while being popular has many negative side effects to people's health. Many companies have made different ads to make people stop smoking, let’s take a look at an advertisement made by Nicotinell to combat smoking and help smokers quit.

Their ad is especially tempting to those of the younger generation. It contains striking colors and graphics, highlighting the crushable capsule located inside their cigarette that releases menthol. The menthol creates a flavor that is supposedly a bold, fresh taste. This would interest people in wanting to try a cigarette. I think it looks appealing based on the principles of the blue background, the enchanting design, and the statements being used. Nonetheless, there are “small print” words hidden in Camel’s advertisement.

Starting off we see emphasis on a marred woman holding a cigarette, along with the alarming text “Warning” at the top of the ad. “When you smoke it shows” is also clear, due to the large text that was used to display it. Placement of such content like this incites the reader to infer that the propaganda is trying to recommend you to not yield to cigarettes. Smoke is repeated throughout the ad many times to keep reminding the audience that’s related

This in turn draws the audience down the page to a smaller tagline explaining what this ladies name is, her age at the time she was diagnosed with throat cancer and even the state that she resides in, which gives a brief personal introduction of Terrie (CDC.gov). By now they are playing on our emotions, so we read further down the page to the “You can quit” “Talk with your doctor for help” taglines to invoke smokers to realize the sooner they seek help to quit smoking the better their chances are of not having this serious detrimental disease known as cancer (CDC.gov). Then we see at the bottom of the page this advertisement is from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, which is part the government branch of the United States Health and Human Services department. Considering these agencies deal with disease daily they are hoping this will help to reinforce the significance of how dangerous the side effects of smoking cigarettes are to everyone’s health.

In November 2010, an anti-smoking ad was released. It features a woman holding a cigarette. Her face is split in half by cigarette smoke, showing a woman who doesn’t smoke, and a woman who does. On the side where it shows a woman who doesn’t smoke, the woman’s face is smooth, her eyes are clear, her hair is dark and healthy, her teeth are white, and her lips are full. On the other side, her skin is wrinkled and pale, her eyes are dim and cloudy, her hair is white, and her lips are pale and thin. On the top of the ad, it says “Your beauty. Up in smoke.” On the bottom of the ad, it says “Tobacco will destroy your face cell by cell, from the inside out. That’s the ugly truth.” At the very bottom right corner, the McCann Healthcare Worldwide symbol

This problem of creating a trendy stylish image of cigarettes are hurting many people by recruiting new young smokers from all around the world, winning over sales due to the false image and then addiction. Third world countries are hurt the most by this unethical way of advertising because they don’t have money for this extra expense that they now need due to addiction. Critics claim that sophisticated promotions in a unsophisticated societies entice people who cannot afford the necessities of life to spend money on luxury- and a dangerous one at that. Every cigarette manufacturer is in the image business, and tobacco companies say their promotional slant is both reasonable and common. They point out that in the Third World a lot of people cannot understand what is written in the ads anyway, so the ads zero in on the more understandable visual image. Due to actions such as this and the negative effect it has on people economically and physically, this is a good example of how the tobacco industry is unethical.

Smoking tobacco has been a part of American culture since its very conception. Throughout our history, tobacco has been advertised as a simple pleasure for those who seek it out. Whether you are sitting on the porch with a couple of friends or in a dimly lit jazz club, tobacco ads give off a false sense of comfort, power, and success. Until around the mid-1900’s, smoking cigarettes was not considered unhealthy. It was only later that the public realize the detrimental health consequences that came with smoking tobacco. To spread this information, specific advertisements were aired to help inform the public of the dangers of smoking. While these ads have changed over time, the same message and warning still remains evident.

Traditionally, many advertisements released by cigarette brands under the Philip Morris label have depicted happy people joined together in friendship (supposedly due to their common habit). Other advertisements attempted to associate cigarettes with sleek mystical figures, sometimes even sexually desirable ones. All this has changed, however, due to recent legal developments in which the cigarette giant was pressured to offer anti-smoking ads, in addition to the usual fictional ones depicting happy mannequins. In no way were they to advertise cigarettes, and they were mandated to help stop youth smoking. These requirements placed Philip Morris in a difficult situation. They needed to satisfy the