Case Study: Men's Division I Basketball Players Should Be Paid

Along with increased enrollment students will stay in college longer to develop their game if they are intending to be a professional. It will allow their draft stock to rise. If they stay in school all four years then they will have the opportunity to expand their knowledge as well as develop their game to a high level to have an immediate impact in the big leagues. If players were compensated it would develop the maturity level and they will be financially educated to handle a big NBA or NFL rookie

When people hear of college athletics, all they think of is a game. Most people do not realize that there is a million dollar industry going on around these athletes. Eric He, a sports fanatic who writes for the Daily Trojan, states, “The NCAA is a nonprofit, tax exempt organization that just happens to be a billion-dollar industry, raking in $740 million per year from March Madness alone” (par. 7). When the NCAA is generating that much money, how can it not go to the players? It is not the

When you say sports most people would either think professional or the best moments that occurred but there is also a dark side to sports that no one wants to talk about. Many things happened or are happening in sports such as racism, steroids, betting, sex scandals etc. but a topic that has been going on for a while is whether NCAA players should get paid. People have spoken out against this and even try to fight it but the NCAA won’t budge and says that they want to keep the amateurism and if they switch to paying players they would be buying the best players making it professional.

The NCAA basketball programs rake in billions every year through the marketing,broadcasting contract, merchandise ,and ticket sale, One big event that every large school looks forward to, the March Madness basketball tournament which by itself generates more than $1 billion each year in the production of advertisements, which is greater than the cost of the ones that are featured in the Super Bowl. If the different coaches can be paid more than millions of dollars each year why can't the athletes be paid as well. Student athletes need money for their personal expenses, keep athletes for selling their own merchandise, and rewards for helping bring in money to help benefit their school.

For years there has been a debate whether college athletes should be paid for playing for their university in the NCAA. The NCAA basketball tournament known as March Madness, is a tournament that generates billions of dollars in revenue every year and the student athletes receive no payment for playing and generating their schools

As the final four comes to a close and the two champions are presented with their trophies, the real winners in some people’s eyes are the sponsors, advertisers, the schools, and finally the NCAA. All of these groups are the ones who end up with the money generated as a result of the games in the tournament and college athletes who particiapte. “The NCAA basketball tournaments, or "March Madness," have become a huge business. As Forbes' Chris Smith wrote, CBS and Turner Broadcasting make more than $1 billion off the games” (US News- Forbes’ Chris Smith). Smith’s statement shows how much money these athletes’ skills and contributions are generating. In return for giving their efforts and producing all this money, the student athletes do not receive any of these proceeds. People think college athletes should also be paid because of the money the NCAA makes off using these athletes names and likeness, like jerseys with an athlete’s number being sold and even in video games being played. Because of this, a group of former players filed an

NCAA is a national business this day of time. At least half of the world is watching a college game when it’s on NCAA, They make over at least 3 million dollars every game. The college’s players get none of that money that’s getting paid to NCAA. The players are the ones that are putting in the work, staying overtime, and killing their body.

Although athletes would be able to leave college with more than just a degree, they can take other classes to increase knowledge to earn more degrees. Even a little bit of money would be really helpful for these athletes who do so much for their school. It would help them out on their new path. Many athletes expect and believe that they should get paid more than just a fully-funded degree. For the athletes that work 90 hours a week for their time in college, the end of their college years, it may seem as if it was a burn out and can be damaging to the athlete. Paying the student-athletes would help them leave college with a little bit of money to help them out on there new path (“Top 10 Reasons College…”). If they stay in school just a couple more years instead of transferring to the pros, it would help them out in the long run so much because

The argument of whether or not the NCAA should pay its athletes has been debated for around 8 years now, and right when it seems like there may be a breakthrough another reason comes up for the issue to be put on hold. College athletic programs are multimillion dollar programs and the athletes who make this revenue possible are getting the bare minimum to make it by in these college programs. Last year the Texas A&M athletic program was at the top of the NCAA revenue list bringing in $192,608,876. A third of that revenue comes from ticket sales alone, which leaves the rest to television rights, licensing and other donations. In the NCAA there are 26 colleges which are bringing in over 100 million dollars in NCAA revenue (USA Today 1). But still, Horace claims that “there is a misconception that athletic programs in general are profitable and are making hand-over fist. While truly most operate at a cost to the institution”.

More than 460,000 student athletes compete in the NCAA alone, many of which are D1 athletes and participate in one the major sports (NCAA). With college athletics on the rise for popularity, March Madness basketball tournament generates more than $1 billion each year in ad revenue (Green). The last audited number for revenue released by the NCAA reported was a yearly revenue of $871.6 million (NCAA). Many think with all the money floating around these athletes should be paid in some way, others argue otherwise (Debate). There is strong controversy whether college athletes should be compensated other than scholarships.

Colleges give athletes the opportunity to play sports at the highest level possible while making a constant progress towards a degree. According to the statistics, these colleges earn a huge amount of money from letting these athletes perform. As an example the NCAA and CBS/Turner sports had a $10.8 million deal for televising march madness during 2011-2014. The enormous amount of money received by the NCAA have turned into the controversy if athletes should be rewarded with money, or with a full-time scholarship during a period of 4 years. My proposal is to not pay college players, because even though they spend a ton of time working hard to perform well, and they miss college classes; an average college player in division I receive a full-time

Throughout the years many schools have been caught paying their athletes money when they are not allowed to. The National Collegiate Athletic Association, or the NCAA, makes billions of dollars every year because of the popularity of their sports.When the school has a successful season they are making millions of dollars and as a result, some schools are breaking the rules and they are trying to pay players and recruits to entice them to come to their school so they can make even more money. This has lead to a corrupt system and has many people asking whether it would be better to just pay college athletes or not.

“Paying student-athletes would provide athletes an incentive to stay in school and complete their degree programs, instead of leaving early for the professional leagues”. If players are paid to perform, they cover some, if not most, of their college tuition that loans or grants could not cover, but in addition they will want to complete their college degree. NCAA promotes themselves that all college-athletes are students first, athletes second. In the article “Should Student-Athletes Get Paid?,” “A university’s primary objective is to provide its students with a quality education that prepares them to function in the world as opposed to in college.” Although, without paying your prime source of revenue, colleges leave their athletes with the options of either not graduating or withdrawal as a result of financial problems. In blatant terms it seems that it should be seemingly simple for schools to pay their

Athletics at college has been and continues to be a billion dollar industry. Over the past few decades, college athletics have increased the ratings and gained popularity across the world. Regardless of the type of sport being played, college athletics became a source of big money and a revenue surplus to the Universities. Colleges generate huge revenue, but the players are not compensated for playing.

I strongly believe that college athletes shouldn’t get paid because a scholarship to a college to play for their team and a free education is enough payment. Student-athletes with full-ride scholarships don’t have to worry about student loans or any other debts they would have to pay back for attending that college.