Case Study : Nokia 's Strategic Partnership Essay

The short product life cycle in this industry requires competitors to continuously evolve. This continual innovation is difficult for new entrants to achieve. Also, existing products, such as Apple’s iPhone, have built brand loyalty and associated switching costs for consumers, which pose as barriers to entry for new competitors.

A new firm needs to make a trade off between performance and compatibility by employing an evolution strategy (offering a migration path) or a revolution strategy (offering superior compelling performance). A firm also needs to make a trade off between being an open system or a closed system as open technologies are popular but rewards are not as desirable as a proprietary technology holder. By using these strategies, firms in network markets approach by using one of the generic strategies from performance play, controlled migration, open migration and discontinuity.

Nokia Company is considered to be one of the biggest market leading in the production of high quality equipment and mobile phones, which was rooted back to 19th century. However, despite the tremendous rise in Nokia, the company experienced massive changes during its presence on the Finnish, which later spread to the world’s market. Nokia Company, started as a small forest industry that dealt in the production of cable and rubber. It then shifted to the manufacturing of computers, more particularly the monitors. Later on, the company diversified its operations and started the production of mobile phones and its related accessories.

For example In 2004 Branson was set to enter the music industry once again by diversifying into the online music industry through an online music store service just like Apple. He also released his own mp3 called the ‘Pulse’ that was to rival Apple’s Ipod. Unfortunately he closed both products later that year due to the fact that Apple kept releasing new products that made the ‘Pulse’ outdated with Apple’s high brand awareness, Virgin found it difficult to rival a large market leader therefore caused them to retrench and withdraw their product. This shows that although diversifications seem the best strategy for profitable growth, it does pose many risks especially when entering new unfamiliar markets.

Both sides had strong incentives to join forces. Nokia had lost significant ground in recent years to smartphone manufacturers, most notably Samsung and Apple, by failing to keep up with innovations such as touch screens.

To effectively regain entry into the markets and remain competitive, the memo emphasizes on the evolution of Nokia and ensure that innovations are delivered to the market in a timely manner. Collaboration among the staff is

The main purpose is to find why Nokia lose the largest market share and have not improvement after innovation. This research will use two type of data these include primary and secondary data to analyse the reasons.

Due to the financial downturn and the emergence of new devices in the global handset

Threats: Nokia phones once dominated the phone market. However, it failed to see the threats from smartphone and the new phone manufacturer, and thus the brand Nokia faced serious strike and almost disappeared until recent.

Nokia’s aggressive strategy to dominate mobile communication cluster would be the main reason how Nokia could become a world leader in the sector among other reasons. Nokia’s passion for mobile communication industry was great enough to give up more than 40% of its revenue in is pre-owned communication industry to concentrate only in mobile communications. Nokia was also lucky enough to see the possibility of mobile communication early enough to predominate the industry and prevent any competition from

Apple’s strategy has evolved as technology does. At the beginning, Apple focused on the computer industry

From Nokia’s vision and mission statement it can be inferred that Nokia wants to be known for its credibility and to be a market leader again as it was before the year 2007 (Kess, 2014). Nokia understands that the company has to use innovation to offer products that are not yet

For Nokia to stay in the business they need to meet these basic requirement of the customer. If Nokia does not meet the customer requirements, then the customers will walk away and will use another brand such as Samsung, Erickson etc. Nokia was successful because they met the needs of the customers. “The Marketing concept holds that the key to achieving the organisational goals lies in determining the needs and wants of target markets and delivering the desired satisfaction more efficiently and effectively than the competition”[3]. For an organisation to provide products that satisfy customers needs through a co-ordinated set of activities that also allows the organisation to achieve its goals, because customer satisfaction is the major aim of marketing concept.[4] Organisations need to communicate effectively with their customers, outlining the benefits of its service and how they can be used to

EV: Generally, the threat of substitutes is low in the smartphone industry as there are not definite products that can readily substitute the smartphone. Consumers rely heavily on Smartphone and would not be able to find a close substitute that has all the function of a mobile phone. Furthermore, Nokia is a long and established company with many loyal customers. These people may continue to stay faithful to Nokia and are hence less resistant to change. Also, the perceived level of product

Several Cellular business of Motorola have experience this weakness resulting in downturn in business and losing most of their prestigious customers around the world.