preview

Case Study Of Abraham Lincoln And Jimmy Carter

Satisfactory Essays

Question 1
What makes people say that Jimmy Carter was a poor president while Abraham Lincoln is still celebrated as a leader of vision and great respect in America? The answer lies in understanding the need to rate leaders. Some leaders such as Alexander the Great are reputed for having shown great leadership qualities while some are neither celebrated nor reputed for having done anything worthwhile. The idea of all this background information is to show that the idea of rating leaders is not an emerging concept, and there are no rules or parameters that should guide the process, but rather on their ability to serve the needs of their followers.
Leadership is not a static process, but rather one which has a lot of dynamism, and the ability to navigate all these issues are what makes a leader to be rated as being great or not. A leader is not one who is at the helm of an organization, but rather one who can motivate, inspire, grow, mentor, and develop others to fulfill their potentials. The inclination being that leaders are as good as their followers. Abraham Lincoln is judged because of the nation that he left behind. Jimmy Carter is remembered for having overseen one of the most corrupt regimes in modern America. The point is that the ability of the leaders to have the desired results and the impact that their actions have on these followers is what counts (Schyns & Wolfram, 2008). Some careers are said to favor women such as nurturing, while men are associated with

Get Access