Clear and Present Danger Determines If Speech Causes Violence

936 Words 4 Pages
1) The various tests the government has come up with are the “bad tendency”, “clear and present danger”, and “direct incitement” tests. Bad tendency test is to determine when speech has a tendency to induce illegal behavior but does not directly encourage the behavior or tell people to do anything. Clear and present danger is used to determine if speech actually has the capability and will cause violence or cause people to do something illegal and can then be restricted. The direct incitement test is speech that is intended to cause lawless action and illegal activity and goes beyond just putting the thought out there. It involves actually motivating and advocating violent or illegal activity and can be restricted. (Roberson, 2014) I …show more content…
1) The various tests the government has come up with are the “bad tendency”, “clear and present danger”, and “direct incitement” tests. Bad tendency test is to determine when speech has a tendency to induce illegal behavior but does not directly encourage the behavior or tell people to do anything. Clear and present danger is used to determine if speech actually has the capability and will cause violence or cause people to do something illegal and can then be restricted. The direct incitement test is speech that is intended to cause lawless action and illegal activity and goes beyond just putting the thought out there. It involves actually motivating and advocating violent or illegal activity and can be restricted. (Roberson, 2014) I think people are well within their right to freedom of speech. Actually, I feel like the government has taken away freedom of speech. How can they claim people have freedom of speech but then put qualifiers on that so people can’t say anything that could cause problems for the government. People should be able to say what they want even if it does cause illegal activity. Only the person who actually commits the act should be held responsible because they are the ones who acted on it. For example, there is that website mentioned in class where someone put up people’s pictures with crosshairs over them and encouraged violence. (Roberson, 2014) In my opinion, person should be allowed to share their belief and opinion even if it is “bad” or
Open Document