Comparative Politics of the French and Mexican Governments Essay

Many politicians argue that there is a need for institutional reform in the United States—the sole purpose of such reform should be to develop a more efficient system for the state as a whole. However, others argue that there are existing institutions in the United States that are structured efficiently. In order to help determine where an individual will stand on the debate about institutional reform, one must compare the effects of different forms of political institutions with the existing form in the United States. There are three new proposals of reform to discuss for the United States: 1) change in the electoral system for the House of Representatives, 2) change in the executive structure

To what extent was Mexico’s independence from Spain a “full-scale assault on dependency”? This essay will investigate how the Mexican independence from Spain was only slightly a “full-scale assault on dependency”, due to several political and social conflicts. Firstly, Mexico remained a monarchy (but not under the control of Spain) after the insurgency. Secondly, there was still an official state religion in Mexico. Another reason is because social conflicts reduced the desire for independence .On the other hand, it assaulted dependency because there were some changes within the social hierarchy, and because Mexico was free from Spain.

There are similarities and differences that arise between the government of Mexico and the government of the United States of America (U.S.A.). One main similarity of the government in both countries is that they are both varying forms of a republic. The republic form of the U.S.A. is a constitution-based federal republic with a strong democratic tradition, while the republic form of Mexico is a federal republic that is not based on a constitution (Wilson, 2008). Differences are in how cabinet members are appointed and how presidents are elected. In the U.S.A., the cabinet is appointed by the president and needs the Senate approval in order to be appointed. Leaders such as the president and vice president are elected by a college of representatives that were themselves elected from each state. Once elected, the president and vice president will serve four-year terms and are able to run for another term for a total of two presidential terms. On the other hand, Mexico’s president is elected via a popular vote and is only able to serve in a single six-year term. Both Mexico and the U.S.A. are members of the United Nations (U.N.), an international organization established to preserve international security and peace. Mexico and the U.S.A. became U.N. members in 1945 (United Nations, 2016).

As once put by Mexican Nobel laureate Octavio Paz, Mexico is a land of “super-imposed pasts” (McCormick, p.326). It continues to be and is seen as a melding pot of its European and Native American ideas about society, law and government. Its history has had a major influence on the political culture of Mexico, seen through years of revolution, violence and corruption. Mexico is a considered a new democracy, but there is a tension still seen between democracy and authoritarianism. The country we see today has impressive growth yet is still enduring poverty. It’s a geographically diverse country, with a population of approximately 106million people. Latin American political culture is seen as “elitist,

a city where an eagle with a snake in its beak rested on a cactus. This

From 1750 to 1914, several important revolutionary processes occurred in the Americas, including those of North America and Latin America. The North American and Spanish American Revolutions were similar in that they both shared the common goal of liberation from the foreign colonial governments that ruled over them. However they differed in that there was no goal for social reform in the American Revolution, but in the Haitian Revolution the slaves had the goal of social reform of the rigid social class system. Another difference between the revolutionary processes in the two regions is that the American Revolution was successful and had stable and positive long-term outcomes, but the Haitian Revolution and Latin American Revolution were

During the Mexican Revolution there were many prominent figures that emerged during the long struggle. Some of the figures had a positive impact on the region, and some others a very negative impact on the people of Mexico and their quest for an uncorrupted government. One figure that stands out in the border region between Mexico and The United States during this time is General Francisco “Pancho” Villa. To understand Pancho Villa’s significant role during this uprising it is important to understand who Villa was prior to the revolution, and what acts lead to his rise to power.

the Chamber of Deputies who are elected every three years. You are able to serve as many terms you want as long as they are not consecutive terms.The people are the ones that elect the state legislatures for each of the 31 states and also the governors. Each member of the Senate are elected to represent their state. If the state is bigger there will be more representatives for that state. In the Chamber of Deputies 300 of the deputies are elected from the country’s electoral districts and the other 200 seats are filled by deputies who do not represent a particular district. The Legislative branch is important because of the laws that they make but the branch that uses them is

President John Adams had sent several delegates, one of them being John Martial, to France to help sort out the issues between France and the US, such as the United States not honoring the Franco-American Treaty, formed back during the American Revolution, when France had its revolution, by meeting with minister Talleyrand of France. Three of Talleyrand’s men met with the delegates and told them Talleyrand refused to meet unless a large amount of money was payed. The delegates returned home and informed President Adams, who was outraged. The name of the Affair comes from the substituting of the three French men’s’ names with X, Y, and Z in a Congress report.

During the time of 1830, the Americans believed in “manifest destiny”. There was a spike in the population, as cheap and fertile land caught the attention of Americans to take on the hardships of the Overland Trails to Oregon and California. A lot of the Americans from the south ended up migrating to the Mexican part of Texas with their slaves, so that they would be able to grow cotton. But the Mexican government wouldn’t authorize slavery and once 1830 approached, they ended up prohibiting any further immigration. During the conflict between the Texas colonist and the Mexican government, this ended up resulting in the Texas Resolution, in which there became the creation of the separate Republic of Texas in 1836. As the US made it adamant that they were going to try everything in its power to not have a war with Mexico, this was one of the reasons as to why Texas didn’t become a state until another decade.

What is a revolution? By definition it means the overthrow of a government by those who are governed. That is exactly what the French and the Mexican revolutions were all about. The living conditions and overall treatment of the poor, pheasants, lower class, last man on the totem pole or what ever you want to call them, was a large factor in the coming of these revolutions. "Those who are governed" are exactly what the lower class people were. Also, liberty was one of the people's major concerns. They were ruled by men whose only desire was power and greed which is what led them into revolt.

The American, French, and Mexico Revolution had many problems with there governments and wanted a change. These people did anything to hopes of ending it, even when it came to violence. They were tired of being treated unfairly and demanding things to be changed. These Revolutions were necessary for these countries. The American, French, and Mexican Revolutions had many differences and similarities between the cause of the revolution and the outcomes of the Revolutions.

During a decade of political and social chaos in Mexico, an uprising was conjuring against President Porfirio Diaz and the dictator style of his reign. As stated in Mexicans in Revolution, 1910-1946: An Introduction, “The roots of the Revolution reached back to the successful programs of the government of Porfirio Díaz and his regime, called the Porfiriato, that governed the republic from 1876 to 1911.”1 Francisco Madero, a representative for the common people and a candidate in the presidential election in 1910, promoted a resistance that opposed the reelection of Diaz. Eventually, the struggle to overthrow Diaz resulted in the Mexican Revolution. Madero’s forces, as well as the federal army, were compiled from middle and lower class men as well as las soldaderas, women soldiers. Las soldaderas represented the brave women that fought next to their brethren on the front line of battle, but also aided the cause behind the scenes by serving as nurses, washers, and cooks. The women’s involvement in the Mexican Revolution was portrayed solely as assistance in the movement to reinvent their country’s government. However, the soldaderas not only aided in the future of their country, but the future of women’s right as a whole. The soldaderas’ contribution in the Mexican Revolution sparked the desire to demand equality and a life free of constraints bound by male ideals of a women’s domestic responsibilities.

Throughout its history Mexico has had many revolutions. The most famous perhaps is the Mexican Revolution from 1910-1920. The people of Mexico were getting tired of the dictator rule of President Porfino Diaz. People of all classes were fighting in the revolution. The middle and upper classes were dissatisfied with the President’s ways. The lower and working class people had many factors such as poor working conditions, inflation, inferior housing, low wages, and deficient social services. Within the classes everyone was fighting; men, women, and children all contributed to the fight for freedom from Diaz (Baxman 2). This revolution proved to be the rise and fall of many leaders.

From the Institutional Revolutionary party (PRI) to the National Action Party (PAN) to the Party of Democratic Revolution (PRD), Mexico has had many political parties in the past and present but many have questioned the fact that how has PRI manage to stay in power and maintain its place as the dominant party in the past. In this short research paper I am going to be talking about Partido Revolucionario Institutional (PRI) and Mexico. I want to discuss the history of PRI and how it came about during and after the Mexican Revolution. I will also touch upon the party’s weaknesses and precursors that might have signaled its loss in the elections of 2000.