Comparing Brother And Son During The Civil War

The Civil War was provoked for several reasons which included industry, slavery, and territorial disputes among the Northern states and Southern states of the newly established United States. The first recorded engagement of war between the North and South is documented to have taken place on April 12th, 1861 at The Battle of Fort Sumter. This was the starting point of a war that would claim over 600,000 American lives in a relatively short span of 4 years.

Both narratives compare as timeless tales of reputable heroes. They both include similar plots of long journeys back home. The main characters’ flaws are arrogance which is the source of many of their troubles.

The two stories both pit the idea of good against evil to explain the contrasting mechanisms of

The similarity and connection existing between the two stories is the point of view in the two essays. The stories are both written in the first person perspective and that

Sadly the Civil War divided our young nation, this time we weren 't fighting another country for our freedom. We were fighting now fighting amongst ourselves--all Americans!!!! The potential to ruin our own nation from within was a distinct possibility. This was brother against brother-families divided. The Civil War lasted four years, 1861 to 1865.

When we compare the military leaders of both North and South during the Civil War, it is not hard to see what the differences are. One of the first things that stand out is the numerous number of Northern generals that led the “Army of the Potomac.” Whereas the Confederate generals, at least in the “Army of Northern Virginia” were much more stable in their position. Personalities, ambitions and emotions also played a big part in effective they were in the field, as well as their interactions with other officers.

     The Civil War was a four year armed conflict between northern and southern sections of the United States. The Civil War cost more American lives than any other war in history. There were bout 3 million people who fought in the beginning of the Civil War and about 600,000 people’s lives were lost at the end of the war. What began for many as a romantic adventure soon became a heartbreaking bitter struggle between the two parts of a divided country. This, however, was more than the industrial North fighting against the agricultural South. There were divided families with brother fighting brother. Some Northerners joined the Southern ranks and some Southerners were in the Union

little more carefully ,you will see that they have a very similar theme, In both of the stories,the authors show us that just because you're different you can still be friends.

These two stories are both eye opening about the evil in the civil war. This story has a few differences between these two stories that are about the civil war. In the story, there are plenty similarities of these two stories. These two men in this story have a good deal of similarities among themselves. Young men are very brave and fought in the war.

To conclude, the stories have similar meanings, as in both arrogance leads to social downfall and the stories use similar ways to lead the reader to this conclusion. However, the stories have very different themes and use different symbols to achieve the same

In these two stories the interlopers, and the machine that won the war there are many differences between the two. There are similarities like the people in the stories wanted to kill someone. Both stories have many differences and some similarities

Both authors show how the main characters in both novels deal with guilt. One deals with it by doing bad things and at first not caring to finally realizing the wrongs he has

In conclusion both of these stories are different and similar in so many ways. Although people must be careful with the decisions that they choose, they must know that decisions that are bad for other people can be good for that person. Provided with this information is a list of my

Firstly, the impact of the war on children is the theme represented in both of the texts.

When looking at the characters of these two short stories, you can see how much contrast the stories have. Ulrich von Gradvitz is the rightful owner of a large forest in the Carpathians, while Georg Znaeym is from the family who used to own the forest. Due to a lawsuit, Ulrich's family took the forest from Georg's family. Because of this lawsuit the two men have a deep set hatred for