preview

Conflict-Handling Style Self-Assessment

Decent Essays

Patricia F. Neff
Professor Jack Kirby
MGT-105-W01
19 July 2015
Conflict Management Project
1. When I took the Conflict-Handling Style self-assessment, I realized that my primary and backup conflict-handling styles are Compromising and Accommodating. I was not surprised by these results, since I usually try to come to a compromise in all conflict situations. I am generally able to do this by accommodating others’ interests as well as staying true to my own. I thought I score highly in the Collaborating style as well, which came in third place on my assessment. It seems as though the Collaborating style is a combination of the Compromising and Accommodating styles, yet it is more of a lengthy process.
2. My scores for my primary and backup styles …show more content…

Newkirk and her organization take individuals and organizations to court, and they also stage protests (sometimes violent). They have even created a controversial videogame2 in order to get others to help further their cause. PETA is very passionate about its cause and is extremely forceful in its attempts to win this …show more content…

PETA’s method seems to be more in line with the Forcing conflict-handling style. They are not willing to back down at all. They believe that their views are absolutely correct, and that anyone using animals for testing is completely wrong in every situation. They are not looking for a compromise and they are not interested in collaborating. The forcing method is not appropriate for this situation because PETA does not have the authority to force the scientific community to obey them. Trying to use the forcing method in this situation has mostly caused negative outcomes for them, like bad publicity and people being arrested for violent protests.
Since the scientific community is willing to look at the interests of PETA and is willing to give up some of their testing on animals, they seem to be using the Compromising style of conflict management. They admit that there are times when alternatives could be used in certain tests instead of animals. Even though there will be times when advances in medicine will be hindered or postponed due to not testing on animals, strict regulations have been placed on animal testing.3 The scientific community seems to be interested in reaching a reasonable

Get Access