Using what you have learned about correlational research and experimental research, describe how scientists could use each of these methods to study the brain. Be sure to show which two variables would be correlated for the correlational study and identify the experimental and control groups, and the IV and DV for the experimental
3- How would you make it an experimental (rather than correlational) study (it might help to be specific here as well and define the two types of studies in your
Instructions: This is a group activity that you will start in class and complete at home. For each of the following, note, whether the research design used is an experiment, a quasi-experiment, or a correlational approach and why. If a study is an experiment, identify the independent variable and the dependent variable. Please type your answers in complete sentences.
Therefore, not fitting with what the hypothesis states. 5c. What could be changed and improved for the correlation technique would be what studies they receive their data from. The correlation technique cannot be manipulated and it is used with the existent data. By changing the data the answers could be changed in order to prove the hypothesis without any defaults. 5d. Correlations are great when it comes to comparing variables. By using the correlation method, it cannot be manipulated because it is using the information that already exist. But, by using an experiment a person can actually prove the hypothesis and it is more concise. It can be manipulated meaning that a person can always find the reason for the results. Furthermore, this can conclude whether the independent variable affected the other variables in the experiment. 5e. An experiment that would help support the hypothesis is by giving 2 people with split brain and 2 people with the intact brain a task that would exercise the brain to see the relationships of the functions of the left and right hemispheres. The experiment would be showing a slide with the faces of well-known celebrities and using name tags. The people with the intact
The study conducted was an experimental study. In this study, an independent variable was manipulated and a dependent variable was measured making it an experiment. A correlational study is where you compare the connection between to variables which did not take place in this study. One group was given the drug and the other was given the placebo. Researchers took note of how the patients given the drug reacted. A hypothesis is a testable prediction of what can happen under specific circumstances. In this study, the hypothesis was: If a group with a stuttering problem is given a certain drug that stimulates parts in the frontal lobe, then the people in the group will experience the ability to speak better. The independent variable in the study
A control variable is one that is held constant in order to assess or clarify the relationship between two other variables. For example, if we held constant the variable of gender (just looking at males) we could examine the relationship between age and optimism in males.
For this study, they wanted to see if this new miracle drug could actually locate the area of the brain that was causing seizure in epileptic people. Experimental research is where the researcher can manipulate a variable and then can control the rest of them. Correlation research is when you can have two or more variables from the same group of people and seeing if there is a relationship between them. The two major differences between experimental and correlation research is the test subjects and how many variables you can control in your research. In experimental you can control all variables and the subjects are randomly assigned groups. In correlation research you can have two or more variables from the same group of people.
In my chosen field of school psychology, correlational research is a great research method in order to build various support groups, interventions, and an overall warm school climate. One topic that I am specifically interested in is the relation of self-esteem and bullying. I would predict that there would be a negative correlation between the two variables, as I believe that bullying is prominently done by those students whom have lower levels of self-esteem.
A cross sectional study, an exploratory correlative study. This method was chosen because the research is quantitative in which it looks to collect a detailed information.
This article was about a mixed methods research study that focused on elementary school children with emotional and behavior problems engagement in a gardening group counseling experience. The article itself did not list a hypothesis but was clear that the expectation was that gardening group counseling would help children with emotional and behavior problems develop healthy self-esteem, learn positive coping skills, develop social skills and acquire skills in self-regulation. The sample population was thirty-three students, data was only taking from thirty-one students because two students had biased responding and repeated absences, who all attended the same school in the southeastern part of the county. The students ranged in age five to twelve and grades kindergarten to fifth-grade. Five of the students were female and twenty-six were males. Racially wise twenty-two were Black followed by seven White, one Hispanic, and one other.
The list of methodologies commonly used by Research Sociologists are survey research and field study. Survey research is usually having findings in percentages, close-ended questions, and large numbers. The acknowledgeable choice would be to use field study because field study uses open-ended questions. Participation in observation is needed and so are personal interviews. The personal interviews consists of open ended questions which is necessary for this research because there are limitless opinions towards the topic of gay marriage and relationships. By having field study, there are more options when answering and all perspectives are being accounted for. Since gay relationships have tension with many groups of individuals, it is important
Qualitative and quantitative research methods are two most common approaches used when conducting a research task on a criminological issue. Some studies use both approaches together to further enhance and support their research and information, while others choose to use just one. The decision to use one
In Psychology 101 we learned that research methods are used in order to understand our mental and behavioral processes by making observations in a systematic way, following strict rules of evidence and thinking critically about that evidence. This scientific research is based on theories (tentative explanations of observations in science), hypotheses (predictions based on a theory) and replication (testing a hypothesis in more than one study). Some of the different research methods are firstly, descriptive studies. Descriptive studies are studies that use survey methods, naturalistic observation and clinical methods. Another research method is correlational studies. Correlational studies are studies that help one to determine if a relationship exists between two or more variables and if so it tells one how strongly those two variables relate to one another. With in correlational studies one can have positive correlation (as one variable increases or decreases so does the other), negative correlation (variables go in opposite directions) or zero correlation (no relationship between the variables). Another research method is formal experiments. Formal experiments are studies that allow us to draw conclusions about how one variable may cause or have an effect on another variable. With in formal experiments there are four elements, which are the independent variable (variable that is manipulated or controlled), the dependent variable (variable that is measured), the experimental
This section provides an introduction to the different types of research paradigms and methods before concluding on the approach that this study will undertake.
Several topics of interest were intriguing to learn in Module one and most topics were straightforward and some were complex. All the information in this week’s module has many impertinent concepts for beginning, average, and advanced students who have research and statistics backgrounds. From all the topics and concepts of research and evaluating reports they were beneficial, straightforward, and thought-provoking. There are numerous topics from research problem, quantitative, qualitative, statistics, and sampling methods that will useful to health professionals now and in the future. The next section of this paper will mention of a possible research topic that will be a stepping-stone and guide for the comprehensive research project. This practice skill for the final project will serve to make the research process easier for the topic question. Lastly, the topic of research will be demonstrated by using the experimental or quasi-experimental method with variables as well as the correlational method. Throughout Module one’s readings a lot of the topics of research go-hand-go and more will be mentioned in further detail.
In doing the research, the methodology must be appropriate so that the analysis findings could reach the objective. Research methodology proposed one procedure in order way to be follow to answer all the questions in the research that want to be made. Quoted by Denzin and Lincoln (1994), methodology is a process that related with research objective and data. In the others word, it is early research planning that include the research scope, data collection method, data collection process and data analysis method. For Ranjit (2005), methodology is one of crucial part in research, in order to ensure the research can be done in the systematic way Overall, this chapter will discuss on the research frame and the methodologies used in order to meet the research objectives. Research process been divided into three main parts there are preliminary research part, data collection and last one data analysis.