Courtroom Observation, Liberty University Essay

Robert Martin was sued for misappropriation of trade secrets in the case of Al Minor & Associates, Inc. vs Martin, in the state of Ohio. The facts of the case are as follows: Robert Martin, a former employee of Al Minor & Associates, formed his own company in 2003, offering the same services as Al Minor & Associates. He did so while still employed at the company. This means that Robert, who was hired in 1998, still had access to its customer files and sensitive account information belonging to Al Minor &.Associates, while forming his own business to compete with them.

In the case Shannon v. Wilson, Plaintiff, Marlan Dale Shannon, sued defendants, L.K. Wilson and Elizabeth Ashworth, for the wrongful death of his son, Charles Shannon. The plaintiff’s son and his friend, Jarred Sparks, were killed in an automobile accident due to intoxicated driving. Jarred was found in the driver’s seat, and Charles was found in the passenger seat. The two minors were found dead and inebriated with blood alcohol levels of .10% and .07%, respectively. Before the incident, David Farmer, also under aged, took them through a drive-through liquor store and was sold beer and liquor without proper verification of age; he left the vehicle at a different location while the two minors remained in the vehicle and consumed the alcohol

Defendant, Aaron Mercer (“Mercer”), by and through undersigned counsel, hereby answers the Interrogatories propounded by Plaintiff, Danielle Price and states as follows:

Professional Courtroom work groups include the judges, prosecuting attorney , defense attorney and public defenders. The judge are elected or appointed public official who presides over a court of law. A prosecuting attorney is an attorney who is responsible for presenting the states against the defendant. The defense attorney represents the accused and ensure the defendant's civil rights. There are three types of defense attorneys private attorneys, court appointed counsels and public defenders.

Pleasant Valley Promenade v. Lechmere, Inc., 120 N.C.App. 650, 664, 464 S.E.2d 47, 58 (1995)

It was my very first time ever attending a criminal court or a court in general for that matter. I have seen many television shows where I have seen many criminal trials and I was always very interested in watch them. I finally had the chance to observe an actual criminal court trial and it was far too different from what I expected. The courthouse itself was very busy and crowded downstairs in the main entrance, but as soon as I went up in the different floors each floor was very quiet I only saw very few people walk by or walk inside the court rooms. I had to go to six different floors of the building just to find a trail that was already in progress.

The prosecution wants you to believe that the waiter negligently served an intoxicated customer who assaulted the plaintiff. That may

My courtroom observation experience involved watching four trials in Remand Court. Each case stood out in a different way, leaving me with several questions about the legal system. I wonder about the effect of court system on adolescent offenders their reintegration into society. I also question the effectiveness of the defense that public defenders provide. My last thought involves the possibility that judges may be biased in making their decisions.

The courtroom workgroup will look to the judge as the deciding factor and directly place responsibility for all the decisions on him or her. This is when the judge will have to take responsibility for deciding which of the mental health offender issues will be addressed by the workgroup, as well as what is and is not made public.

“ A Job worth doing, is worth doing well.” Standing in my office helping businesses with their contracts with one another or being able to stand in a courtroom prosecuting and saving a victim from having their offender being let off easy brings me joy. Seeing that i have grown as an strong and confident person who defends companies and the helpless victims who are not heard. To get to this point it took a lot of work such as passing exams, gaining an four year degree from a university, getting acceptance into law school, and also all the practicing needed.

When someone steps into the courtroom it requires that person to change how they act, to change how they present themselves, and to change who they are. When I stepped into the courtroom at the National Judicial Competition my whole world changed. However, it didn't happen all at once. The process began months before I arrived in Chicago. It started the day I accepted the invitation from the state office. That day the little boy inside of me began to fade.

Throughout my experience as an intern at the Immigration Court Watch Program I was able to observe four different courtrooms each with a different judge. Unfortunately, during the time that I was observing inside of the courtroom I was only able to see two cases where the judge came to a conclusion. I assessed the credibility of the judge’s decision based on the dangerous decisions theory and the evidence for both cases. The first case was about a man who was hoping to apply for residency in the United States, but he had a criminal record. However, he was still able to apply for it without guarantee of him receiving residency. He asked the judge if he could stay in the United States during the process because when filing that specific application

Today I got the chance to observe Probate Court with Judge Kelety. Judge Kelety was well informed and reiterate in detail what an entire case was about in five

Our judicial system works hard every day to uphold the rule of law. Whether you are sitting in on a case, watching Court TV, watching legal based movies, or whatever it may be, you notice that there are different parties and people involved in the whole charade. There are different jobs within our court system that coincide with each other to keep our courts strong and orderly. These jobs include: judge, bailiff, stenographer, jury, clerk, and prosecuting attorney. These different jobs have specific duties that help the court system thrive.

The date I attended court was October 18th 2017. The time of the court appointment was set to begin at 9:30AM. However, the court appointment did not start until 9:55AM. The court appointment lasted for about ten minutes. The court appointment was held in 9-A, and the presiding Judge was Judge Hillary.