Cyberspace Hate Propaganda and Internet Censorship Essay

It is about time we have some filters or establish and enforce legal ramifications on the use of the internet when hate speech is identified in all 50 states. These legal ramifications should be extended to people in authority who use information from the internet to get to their subordinates. The internet has radically changed the way we get and disseminate information. The internet is a place to express free speech and just be yourself, but this has many times come back to hunt users in a negative way. This paper will be looking at how schools, workplaces, and even other users misuse the idea of free speech on the internet and why we need to filter hate speech and introduce legal ramifications for these actions.

On the issue of whether or not schools should be allowed to limit students’ online speech, I firmly believe that they shouldn’t. Doing so directly infringes upon the student’s first amendment rights to the freedom of speech, and for what? Numerous surveys have shown that cyberbullying isn’t a huge problem. Further, one document affirms the conclusion that cyberbullying is just another phase in the long-running evolution of bullying. With this essay, I aim to convince you that schools should not limit their students’ online speech, using my vast knowledge as well as cold hard facts.

Some people believe that the internet is “designed for opinions, rants, and invective” (Source C). They use that excuse to justify their actions whether their comments are friendly or not. In another case, more than 50 students protest a principal’s decision to suspend a student for cyberbullying. The students that did participate in the sit-in expressed that the student accused of cyberbullying was “exerting his rights to post what he pleases” (Source B). These accounts prove that the bullies know what they are doing is wrong and are aware of the potential outcome of their words. When students are accused of cyberbullying another person, they often find an excuse for what they did; the First Amendment of the Constitution. However, if these adolescents felt as if  their comments were not wrong in any way, they would not bother to look for an excuse when being

It can be easy for teens to disconnect from the consequences of their words when they are connected to the internet because they are not able to see the reader’s real-life reactions to their posts (Patchin & Hinduja, 2015). According to the authors, many of the teens that they have spoken with which have been accused of cyberbullying have reported that they did not realize the harm that their words caused the victim (Hinduja & Patchin, 2014; Patchin & Hinduja, 2015). Therefore, this means that it is just as crucial to teach teens to stop and think before they post online as it is to teach them to stop and think before they speak (Patchin & Hinduja, 2015). The authors use this chapter to remind teens that the same moral standards that govern their social behavior both at school and at home also apply to the digital world, and they need to act with the same integrity online as they would when they are off line (Patchin & Hinduja,

If there is anything we know for sure, it is that the internet will never be the perfect virtual paradise we want it to be. Those who advocate regulating speech on the internet are trying to create an online utopia: a place where all expression is positive and building. But we are humans, and when we desire to

    In June of 1998 the country was horrified to learn of the death of James Byrd Jr. He was a 49-year-old black man who had been found horribly mutilated after being dragged to death. Authorities have charged three men with murder and violation of civil rights ("A Fatal Ride in the Night" 33). Obviously, if convicted, these men are guilty of a horrible crime, but what if this crime had been committed after viewing a racist website? If a person reads an emotionally charged, hate-filled website and then commits an act of violence, can the creator and owner of the website also be found guilty?

Kolbert refers to research that shows that when bigoted students associate with bigots they become “more bigoted” and when tolerant students associate with other tolerant students they become “more tolerant”(Kolbert). The internet is an expansive place where one can find enough people that believe the same crazy idea that they do and use that to justify their belief to themselves. When right and left wing extremists read enough radical rhetoric they become more and more liberal or conservative. They do not necessarily base their political ideology on what they believe, but on what radical politicians want them to believe. Group polarization leads to political hatred and prejudice instead of intelligent discussion about issues. The internet is a key contributor to the advancement of group and political

  The common image that comes to mind on the topic of censorship is that of book burning. Dating back to ancient times, the easiest way to deal with unwanted writings has been to get rid of them, usually by heaping them into a blazing pyre. In his most famous science fiction novel, Fahrenheit 451, Ray Bradbury warns of a futuristic society where all literature is destroyed under a kerosene flame and the citizens' freedoms are kept in check by the lack of written information. In fear of this kind of totalitarianism, many bibliophiles have fought against all manners of censorship, wielding the first amendment and the rights recognized by our fore-fathers. But with the technological advances of this the

The problem is that nowadays; everyone have an access to the Internet to see and to explore what provide in it, and there is no limitation or control over what written and providing there. Hater groups have found Internet particularly appealing because they can spread and provide their ideas, their plans and their goals to unlimited number of people. The Supreme Court declared that Internet is consider a public square which make it unconstitutional to the government to sensor such websites as hate websites. There is a research done to test how Internet is becoming

The Internet has made great leaps in the field of personal freedom however that has also led to an increase in racism and extremism which can lead to the destruction of human empathy. All racist websites are hate oriented sites, but while hate sites often carry racist information, some may also contain anti-abortion extremist and anti-gay information as well. While discriminatory hate sites are best

Eissens, the secretariat for the International Network Against Cyber Hate (INACH), argues that online hate speech should be regulated. He thinks regulation will deter extremist groups from using it to incite racist, religious, or discriminatory violence. His argument is based on the claim that hate groups use the Internet as a platform to spread their hateful messages. “Incitement through electronic means is not different from incitement by traditional means.” Additionally, Eissens states that regulating online hate speech is aimed to deter hate crimes, not to change individual ideologies or restrict the freedom of expression. Eissens also claims that hate disrupts society in all of its facets, including government and commerce. Hate speech

This paper explores what cyberbullying is, explains different types of cyberbullying, and tries to persuade the public to report any suspicious activity that may relate to cyberbullying. Cyberbullying is a unique and new situation brought on by the increase in technology use today. Unfortunately, this harassment is deadly to some people, and the public must start reporting these situations. Early detection and proper handling could help technology become less of a weapon and a better tool for today’s youth. Therefore, this paper discusses a few trends that are seen with cyberbullying to better prepare the public to recognize cyberbullying situations. Overall, the older the child the more likely he or she is to be in a cyberbullying situation and minorities are prone to being bullied (Walrave & Heirman, 2011; Gini & Espelage, 2014). Any suspicious behavior seen on the internet should be reported to reduce the risk of deadly results.

Historical/Cultural Focus: Propaganda and Censorship Throughout history, governments and political entities have attempted to alter and control the information that reached its citizens. Utilizing propaganda to persuade and censoring information by not allowing citizens to gain full knowledge of events have been two of the most common ways that governments have attempted to control their citizens. Governments, groups, and individuals engage in propaganda when they choose to manipulate, alter, or control information with the purpose of forming or intensifying a particular response or opinion in their target audiences. The term “propaganda” began when Pope Gregory XV established the Sacred Congregation for Propagating the Faith, a group charged

The freedom of speech that was possible on the Internet could now be subjected to governmental approvals. For example, China is attempting to restrict political expression, in the name of security and social stability. It requires users of the Internet and electronic mail (e-mail) to register, so that it may monitor their activities. In the United Kingdom, state secrets and personal attacks are off limits on the Internet. Laws are strict and the government is extremely interested in regulating the Intern et with respect to these issues.10 Laws intended for other types of communication will not necessarily apply in this medium.

Some people wonder who came up with the idea of internet censorship. Other people want to know which countries use it. Some ponder over the idea of what really is internet censorship. Internet censorship is controlling what can be viewed, and which sites can be used on the internet. Some things about internet censorship are countries that use it, and who started the idea of it.