Decarbonize Urban Areas

Between the 18th century and the end of the Industrial Revolution, English cities began to see a rapid increase in urbanization and development. Great Britain, proud to show their economic splendor, hosted the Great Exhibition of 1851. This was a showcase of British industrial power, and was the first of a chain of World Fairs that let the wealthier countries show their wealth for all to see. It can be seen on document six, a map of the city of Manchester, that between 1750 and 1850 there was massive growth, industrialization, and restructuring including new railroads and canals. Document 8, an excerpt from Manchester in 1844, describes how the town of Hyde only had 800 total residents at the beginning of the 19th century, while in 1843 there

Midyear Essay Rewrite The expansion of trade led to the urbanization of Europe in the late Middle Ages through the development of towns, guilds, and the rise of education. Urbanization is the process by which cities form and expand. As trade expanded, a city's popularity could grow and more merchants would want to travel there to receive more business and customers.

One of the largest contributors to a high ecological footprint is related to personal transportation and the construction, maintenance and operations of buildings3. When more people are living in an area, the amount of energy and transportation needed decreases and so does the area’s ecological footprint3. This occurs because as walking increases, the amount of personal driving decreases. Another way Vancouver is working to reduce its ecological footprint is by protecting land in the “Green Zone”7.

How successful has the regeneration of urban areas been given the variety of ways it has been undertaken (40 marks)

All in all the industrial revolution had a positive effect on society, accomplishing things many do not realize and creating a turn of events that would put the USA as the world power. New farming methods meant better diets, which lead to lower death rates. Efficient and useful inventions, as well as machinery, made it easier for people to work, and made more job opportunities, as well as enjoyment in the workplace. More and easier ways of travel became commonplace, such as railroads. In addition, as cities began to grow, streetlights provided safety at night, and our economy grew greatly. While some might argue that Industrialization had primarily negative consequences for society because it caused children to be used as workers and made school

In place of tall, high-density towers, suggestions have been made by some heritage groups for the construction of a greater number of smaller and more compact high-density buildings. Even though smaller buildings would help to preserve the views of London's major landmarks, they would not be built in the best interest of the city. Since there is a lack of available land in the city and low rise, high-density complexes require more land than tall, high-density towers, the only way to construct these developments would be to expand outward. An outward expansion would not only be expensive, requiring a development of infrastructure in those areas strong enough to support new businesses, but almost entirely impractical due to London's poor transport system. Even though half a million London workers live in the suburbs and depend on the radial rail system that links them to the center of the city, the system as a whole is expensive, heavily congested and wasteful; it

Rapid urbanisation has caused a variety of problems, including transport congestion, lack of sufficient homes and living conditions, sanitary and health care issues, and crime. For all these problems, city planners have attempted potential solutions, each with varying degrees of success. Cities including London, Manila and Mumbai have several of the aforementioned problems, and have each tried their own potential solutions. This essay will discuss how successful these schemes have been in resolving these issues.

Low density development and urban sprawl, together with automobile dependency are the factors contributing to global warming. Unfortunately, low density development remains the fastest growing land use in Australia. It consists of homes located on large block of lands. This paper has argued that this pattern of development is unsustainable because it requires significant amount of energy to sustain. The low-density design of Australian cities, together with the large-scale infrastructure for managing resources are key drivers to the environmental problems facing Australia and the principal reasons behind Australia’s exceptionally large per capita carbon and ecological footprints ( Rauland and Newman 2011). In order to decarbonise our cities,

Urban sustainability is the idea that an urban area can be organised without excessive reliance on the surrounding countryside and be able to power itself with renewable sources of energy. The aim of this is to create the smallest possible environmental footprint and to produce the lowest quantity of pollution possible, to efficiently use land, compost used materials, recycle it or convert waste-to-energy, and to make the urban area overall contribution to climate change minimal. Therefore allowing the next generations and future generations to have the required resources without compromising them. However sustainably needs to focus also on other issues such as crime and economic factors.

Before taking this quiz personally I had little to none knowledge on density but when I finished the quiz I defiantly learned a few things. I now know that density is really an issue and it can be good and bad at the same time in my opinion. Some feel that density in cities is bad because people live very close to each other and they don't have their own space. Often builders will put houses as close together as they can and the same goes for apartment buildings. The closer the buildings are together the more people that are going to be in that area. The more people in that area is going to bring the issue of more transportation and supplies (grocery stores, gas stations) around the developments. Now planners and builders work together

I grew up in two different places. From the day I was born until age 6, I lived in a small village in Ukraine. My family then moved to California, where I continued growing up in Sacramento. These two places have completely different lifestyles. I will begin with my life in Ukraine. As previously mentioned, I grew up in a small village, where everyone had land that they farmed. Farming was our main source for food, because back then not everyone was able to afford to buy food at stores. Everyone also had animals, mostly chickens, pigs, and cows. Most families had one cow; the lucky ones had two or three. Every day, there was always work to be done, we couldn’t just sit in and relax the whole day. The farmland had to be plowed, watered, and farmed, the animals had to be fed and cleaned after. This was our daily routine. Our family had an old car that literally had to be fixed after every single time it drove. Our life in Ukraine was very sustainable. We rarely used our car, so there was very little carbon emissions. We didn’t have electricity, so we used candles and oil lamps as our light sources. Overall, our lifestyle was very green in Ukraine, until we moved to Sacramento, CA.

I believe that the city of London, Ontario should utilize compact growth and land use intensification to successfully incorporate the almost two hundred thousand people it expects to add to its population over the next fifty years. My confidence in the use of this city planning policy is on account of the fact that it increases the sustainability of the city, through encouraging the reuse of under-utilized lands instead of expanding the city into vacant outlying areas, which may be harboring delicate ecosystems that may be irreparably affected by human augmentation of the environment. Another aspect of compact growth that justifies my support is the fact that this scheme for urban growth will preserve more than 6 400 hectares of Canada's best

A sustainable city is when harmony is reached between the environment, economy and society. Environmentally, sustainable cities are ecologically friendly by using alternative sources of energy such as solar or wind power. Economically, governments should share a similar decision-making process with institutions and with the public by having a common belief in what should be done by improving sustainability. Sorensen, Marcotullio, and Grant (2004), find that a good decision making process consists of planning and control at the municipal and national political levels which would allow local level functions to become reinforced. Socially, sustainable cities are classless, meaning that there are no social divisions which serve as limits; leading to a more equal society. One of the many ideas would be using mixed housing to remove the class divisions between people. Also, city streets would be walkable, with businesses and services located at close proximity to promote a healthier lifestyle and serve as an alternative to using cars for transportation. The writers differ in their analysis when examining the approaches to improving sustainability in cities. This section will analyze four important ideas on how cities can become more sustainable.

Gordon & Richardson and Ewing raise different arguments in regards to different elements of compact cities and sprawls. These arguments are based on their respective views and literature reviews that raises questions on the environmental friendliness, economic efficiency, social equity and the place of technology on future development of cities. Gordon and Richardson arguments propose sprawls instead of compact cities. Although most planners advocate for compact cities, they are convinced that compact cities are not always beneficial in the long run. Gordon and Richardson argue that auto costs in compact cities are still higher than in suburbs even with the short distances found in compact cities (Gordon & Richardson 98). The average dweller in the compact city travels more than the one in the sprawls which exposes the environment to risks from pollutions.

Urbanization, which is becoming a buzzword during the last few decades, is enlarging at a booming speed. It is predicted that 93 percents urban growth will occur to the year 2020, in the developing world (Elliot J.A, 1999). Generally speaking, more than half of the people around the world have been moved to cities, which led to a series of “matters” connected with people’s life that changed in a dramatical way. In this period, sustainable development, another buzzword during the past few years, came into people’s view and gradually became the mainstream of society development. Its definition is to make the development continue in a long term, which means allowing appropriate economic growth and industrialization without