Descriptive Essay About Valdada

There will not be fewer jobs, because every individual will have access to a robot as mentioned earlier, although success will not from simply owning a robot but working with the robot in order to innovate ,”Our human assignment will be to keep making

I had the privilege to go to the Lincoln Station. As soon as I got off I started to go to the houses that were near the station. I started to do observations of the things I saw Then I compared the geography of Denver to Lone Tree. Lastly, I decided which one of the two was a more sustainable city. The following paragraphs show my findings. In Lone Tree, I saw more of a plant variations. They were houses that had different types of plants. In Lone Tree, you're able to see more grass in each individual house. Another thing I saw was that the population in Lone tree was very small compared to the population in Denver. The bigger the population the more cars people are going to use.This will cause more gasses enmities to the atmosphere. The amount of needed to eat is directly related to the population of a place. Since their more population their more trucks coming in and out for food. Another of the many observations I saw was that the houses in Lone Tree were very big. When houses are very big the people living in the houses use more of everything. They use more light to power their house. Another of the things big houses use is a large amount of the heating and cooling system. It takes a longer period of time to keep their houses warmer or

We as a community are all able to contribute to alleviating this problem. We pay a big amount of taxes, and it is reasonable to say that we can have a say in how to spend some of them. The community would be a much better place if the government, as well as some more fortunate individuals, are able to spend money on efforts to preserve our pristine environment. Many charities and organizations of people we could trust would spend this money appropriately, and it would be great if more people supported these groups. It would also be helpful if the government leaders can legislate stricter regulations in terms of infrastructure’s pollution limits. The Loudoun County region is quickly urbanizing, and it would be very beneficial if we can continue to grow without any damage to our climate. In practicality, many things can make sure of this. For instance, the local council could enforce that all construction and industrial processes are done by the most modern and eco-friendly technology.Some might argue that this would drive industries away, but I think that the businesses that would leave are not appropriate for our community to house anyway. Our community could also do with more parks and reserves in the area. Driving around the city, I see that lush, dense woods that house a great number of organisms are being cleared out for more offices and buildings. This is somewhat inevitable, but I think there should

The idea that machines will take the jobs of humans is very two sided. I understand that it is cheaper to have machines and that will allow the companies to downsize on employees but it is very important to understand that without the use of human attendants to operate those machines, they’re useless. There are many jobs like care givers and doctors that will never be able to be done by a machine. An increase in machines will increase the supply and allow for the prices of certain goods to decrease. This will help boost the economy and allow for more American made products.

We have already seen a decrease in jobs due to automation. Since 2000, the United States has lost 5 million factory jobs, while from 2006 to 2013, manufacturing grew by 17.6% (roughly 2.2% a year). 88% of those jobs were lost due to “productivity growth,” cites a study by Ball State University. The study also found that all sectors grew in terms of productivity by at least 32% from 1998 to 2012 when adjusted for inflation, with computer and electronic products rising 829%. In fact, the researchers found: “If 2000-levels of productivity are applied to 2010-levels of production, the U.S. would have required 20.9 million manufacturing workers instead of the 12.1 million actually employed.” In summary, due to companies’ expenditures in automation and software, the output per U.S. manufacturing worker has doubled over the past two decades. Indeed, “the real robotics revolution is ready to begin,” according to the Boston Consulting Group, who predict “the share of tasks that are performed by robots will rise from a global average of around 10% across all manufacturing industries

Urbanized areas also modify microclimates and air quality by altering the nature of the land surface and generating heat (Oke, 1987). Although ecological impacts of urban development often seem to be local, urbanization also causes environmental changes at larger scales. Today's cities are sustained by a socioeconomic infrastructure that operates on global scales; the ecologically productive area required to support an urban area can be 100 to 300 times larger than the urban region (Rees & Wackernagel, 1994). A new cooperative relationship between science, business and policy is needed to gather all the information needed and to find a solution that benefits all of society. The study of urban ecology ultimately involves studying how to integrate this new interdisciplinary knowledge about urban ecosystems into policymaking processes--to improve interactions between policymakers and scientists so as to help society achieve more sustainable existence. Today, the scientific and political communities lack the effective two-way communication and trust that they need to address urban ecological problems. Although science can help society formulate a range of options to achieve societal goals, it cannot make value judgments. In addition, scientists often cannot deliver definitive answers to questions posed by policymakers. To be able to find solutions to the larger issues

Air pollution is a big problem here in Canada. With so many companies, factories and gas emitting power sources, our country has a numerous amount of greenhouse emissions. In fact, Canadian companies has contributed to 73% more air pollution than the United States. Our companies produced up to 29% more respiratory toxins than the U.S. as well. If you look at major cities like Toronto or Edmonton, you’ll notice how the air is thicker than usual. That’s because of the air pollutants such as transportation, agriculture, forestry, and domestic uses. These pollutants create something called, the ground level ozone layer, or smog as most people call it. This kind of air pollution gravely affects humans, animals, plants, or

People are moving to the city from the rurals because they then won’t have to go all the way to the city from their communities to get supplies in the polluted air.

When talking about redevelopment that have the potential to add an additional 25,000 people to an existing population, one of the important factors that need to be discuss is the air quality impacts. In the foreseeable future, with or without the implemented plans in the Plan Area will experience an increase in population. According to Adam Brinklow, the author of How the city plans to add 25,000 people to Central SoMa, without any plan it is estimated that around 16,000 people will settle in the Plan Area anyway, but with plans implemented, the Plan Area would add 25,000 to the current number of residents by 2040. When more people congregate in an area that was at one time had a low density population, this will have some sort effects on

Centralizing their efforts in making public transit readily available for people but also the access to many shops and stores. Evolving into the fastest growing metropolitan city, Los Angeles now offers a wide range of housing that attracts many for more than one reason. Promoting walkable living and easy access to vast activities and restaurants. Adding up all the amenities, allows for an understanding of the positive carbon footprint and smog depletion. Over the years Los Angeles has become less sprawled of a community in an effort to better breathing and smog conditions in surrounding neighborhoods. Depicted by the image below, Los Angeles ranked number one as the most effective city in their efforts to centralize all goods, living, and public transportation within a walking distance. Therefore, encouraging people to walk instead of driving and lowering air emissions for a cleaner

Changing our cities into CFC requires classifying the neighborhoods in term of welcomed and ‘anti-social’ to exclude areas that do not require an action of change to be in priority. For example, the selected neighborhood holds blocked are of military uses and streets classified as arterial ones in the Cairo City. These two types are weak potential for CFC in compression to the local streets and greenery zone.

The convenience of living in an urban or suburban neighborhood can be appealing to many people. Choosing between areas can sometimes be overwhelming for some individual. People are not only concerned about the safety of a community, but they are also concerned about the environment. Although some neighborhoods might look attractive, people should consider the expense that comes with it, and how commuting will affect them in the long run. Nevertheless, both neighborhoods have their specific advantages and disadvantages. When choosing between an urban or suburban neighborhood, it is important for people to research the community, the expense, and convenience

Ensenada Baja California, a nice little town near to the frontier where you can walk and ride a bicycle without the fear of being rolled over. The person that gave name to it´s main avenue is the first man that ever lived there: Jose Manuel Ruiz, who also owned Ensenada during some time, before it passed to his daughter and her husband, this happened three times more with three other couples.

Since the last century, society has been witness of great deal of changes, as political as economic, and technological. These changes have opened a new world of possibilities which was not available before, people should consider themselves fortunate of living on the 21st century. There is access to information as has never been before. Nevertheless, change always has consequences, and on this time of technology is not the exception. The earth is dying slowly, the air people is breathing is not safe anymore. The United States has a bad air quality, an example of it, is the city of Houston, in the state of Texas. In fact, Houston’s pollution problem has become a dangerous health issue over the last years. To solve this severe problem is necessary

Over time our lives seem to have become more and more integrated with our technology. Some may say that this is a very bad thing because this change may result in the loss of jobs for millions of people. Jobs such as, cashiers, bankers, legal assistants, and maybe even taxi drivers. The future may appear bleak at first, but the truth of the matter is that robots taking over our simple and automatable jobs just mean that our jobs can evolve with the technology. A very similar thing happened during the industrial revolution when technologies were developed that massively increased the efficiency and yield of farming. This in turn led to a vast increase of food in the country which led to a lesser need for everyone to be a farmer. With a massive amount of food, former farm workers, and advanced technology, a business of mass production and manufacturing began. The loss of jobs due to technology led to a