Detrimental Consequences Of Whistleblowing

Whistle blowing does take courage. There is the risk of being bullied or harassed as a result, but anyone who whistle blows has the right to protection from the person they have raised concerns about. If you suffer as a result of a whistle blowing incident the UK Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 offers legal protection.

Whistleblowers were never treated with hospitality. In general, 90% of whistleblowers lost their jobs or were demoted, regardless of the industry; 27% faced lawsuits; 26% had psychiatric or medical referrals; 17% lost their homes, and 8% went bankrupt (Waters 2008). As highly righteous as whistleblowers are, they also suffer severe consequences. In Hughes Aircraft case, the company's employees who decided to blow the whistle, Goodearl and Aldred were extremely affected and treated unfairly, so much so that " [Goodearl] and her husband had to file for bankruptcy, and Aldred was on welfare for a year before she could find another job."(The Hughes Whistleblowing Case , n.d.). Hence, the main focus of this paper is to determine

For many whistleblowers, fear of persecution and retaliation has prevented them from speaking out against improper behaviors at their institutions. Because of the dangers that whistleblowers are exposed to, many companies have become proactive in promoting and protecting whistleblowing. As a case and point, we need to look no further than the banking giant, Barclays.

Review “Just pucker and blow: An analysis of corporate whistleblowers” in Chapter 2. Please respond to the following:

A whistleblower is a person who raises a concern about a wrongdoing in their workplace or within the NHS or social care setting. If a person wishes to raise their concerns they should obtain a

What is the explanation of the standard view on whistleblowing presented by Sissela Bok and reported by Robert Larmer in his article?

Hayley, I absolutely agree with you. Each individual must make his or her own decision as to whether the disturbing unethical offense is worth the personal cost (Reece 2014, pg 111). When I was personal faced with trying to decide to whistle blow or keep quiet and do nothing at all; I had to tell. I tried to just keep my head down and be silent but, the silence was literally making me sick. I couldn’t eat, I couldn’t sleep, and what I knew was constantly on my mind, I felt like I couldn’t function properly. The reason I was unable to function was because not being honest was not in my charter. I made the decision to be the whistleblower, and yes I did receive some back lash but for me that was better than the silence. Every individual is different,

Whistleblowing- It is designed to proper employees from being victimised by their employer, so they will “blow the whistle” on wrong doing. Work places try to create an environment which enables staff to raise whatever concerns they have. Staff are assured if they raise a genuine concerns under this policy they will not be at risk of punitive action being taken against them. However this doesn’t not cover people who maliciously raise an issue that they know not to be true. An employee can make a disclosure based

There are those who profit from blowing the whistle, aside from that is the risk really worth it? The answer is yes. In spite of the negative employment aspect, whistle blowing shows that a person has enough

A whistle-blower is a person who exposes illegal or immoral activity that they have witnessed. This can be knowledge of misused public money, law breaking, unethical actions, or activity that pose risk to public safety. Employees who have witnessed immoral or illegal actions often decide to keep quiet.

The things whistleblowers do are very serious. One should always remember that such actions may lead to the loss of money and

Bradley Manning is 27 years old in prison for leaking over 700,000 documents to WikiLeaks, the largest leak of classified documents in history. In 2010, he was a low level military intelligence analyst in Iraq when he was detained under suspicion of stealing classified information. He came to trial three years later on twenty charges of espionage and theft. Manning was sentenced to 35 years in prison and will most likely serve about eight years of that.

The definition of a whistleblower is a past or pesent employee or member of an organization, who reports misconduct to people or entities that have the power and presumed willingness to take corrective action, or to notify the general public of wrongdoing. In most cases, whistleblowers are employees of the ogranization but can be employees of government agencies as well. Normally the misconduct being reported is a violation of law, rule, regulation and/or a direct threat to public interest such as fraud, health, safety violations, and corruption. The word whistleblower originates from the old practice of English bobbies who would blow their whistle when they noticed a crime that was being committed. The blowing

Whistleblowers perform in many careers and are found at all levels of an organization: scientists and secretaries, lawyers and paralegals, managers and staff, security personnel and computer specialists, etc. They are as varied in age, ethnic background, education, profession, sex, and income as the population at large.

There are varied motivations that drive whistleblowers to take action. As Schrieber (2006, 42) explains, whistleblowers manifest in myriad ways, "from disgruntled employees or customers to high-level executives trying to do what they see as the right thing." Thus, their motivations are just as likely to be altruistic as they are self-serving. Regardless, whistleblowing reflects poorly on the company and can severely damage the company's well-being, as the cases of Enron and Freddie Mac testify. There are, however, a number of measures that corporations can take to protect themselves. First, a company should anticipate that whistleblowing will occur; jaded employees invariably exist, and while a company should do their best to promote worker satisfaction, whistleblowing may still occur. Accordingly, the company should construct complaint procedures, internal investigation procedures, and a training program for managers and high-end officials, as this will allow them to quickly and efficiently deal with whistleblowing before it reaches a court of law. It is also necessary to keep track of employees' behavior, in order to identify the possibility of whistleblowing occurring before the event takes place. In order to protect whistleblowers, it is necessary to disclose as little as possible and avoid retaliation, which is illegal.