Direct Organizational Leaders

This leadership style is where the leader actually has to plan and synchronize training in order that the small units are able to produce the tactical into the operational action. At the organization level a leader is not in a traditional leadership position when they are directly in charge of soldiers. Leaders in this style are the one whom establish section that develop plans and create orders. When a result is achieved at this level the entire team is responsibility for the outcome. Organizational leaders make decision that affect the long term goal and helps plan the short term mission for their subordinate units.

Independent of the Army and country you serve, leadership is always an important subject. There are many civilian books and military manuals talking about leadership. The United States Army divides the subject leadership in three levels. These levels are Direct Leadership, Organizational Leadership, and Strategic Leadership. In this paper, the focus will be only about the first two levels. According with you rank, you will work more in one of these levels. Because of that, most part of time there is not much interaction between higher-level leaders and lower level leaders. Despite the limited interaction between higher level leaders like Brigade commanders with the lower level leader like company commander it’s not affect a satisfactory mission accomplishment.

"Leadership is the process of influencing people by providing purpose, direction, and motivation to accomplish the mission and improve the organization" (Mills, 2013). The Army measures its leaders by their attributes and their core leader competencies. Also, a leader must be able to train, coach and mentor their subordinates. Additionally, the Army has three levels of leadership: Direct, Organizational, and Strategic. An effective leader understands and practices these qualities at an operational level.

Leadership development in the military is critical to its mission and objectives. Understanding and embracing leadership will foster an agile culture and facilitate attainment of strategic goals. People desire quality leadership to assist with achieving their goals, albeit personal or professional development. Having a clear vision and the motivation to perform at high-levels influences others to work synergistically together to achieve organizational goals. Insomuch, employees value being treated respectfully, fairly, and ethically. Leaders serve people best when they help them develop their own initiative and good judgment, enable them to grow, and help them become better contributors.

This paper on Leadership will compare the primary differences and characteristics between the tactical leader and the organizational leader. I will provide you with the basics for development, characteristics, and the fundamentals that help guide and influence each leader’s style and how they influence Soldiers to follow them. Leaders at all levels demonstrate their values, knowledge, skills, and abilities in many different means and methods in

At the end of the day, a true leader “in the army will do these three things live by the army core values, know the warrior ethos, and lead by example”-MSI textbook. Leaders both in and out of the army are held to a higher standard holding themselves in a professional manner at all times. The success of the group is attributed to the leadership styles and core values instilled in the solider to do his job effectively. General Eisenhower once

Being a leader is always a challenge, and assuming a new command is challenging. There are a lot of expectations to me as a leader. The organization has selected me to a new position, and they believe I fulfill their standards for their leaders. The organization trust and expect me to lead, develop and achieve. My superiors and subordinates have a lot of expectations. They expect me to lead them in the best way to solve our assigned missions. In my new assignment as commander of 4th Armor Brigade Combat Team (ABCT), the main critical leadership problems are the lack of cohesive teams, ethical and work standards and the level of stress. I will through analyze explain and defend my selection of critical leadership problems and apply a model for solving them, including implementing and measuring my vision as the new brigade commander.

Leaders are look upon as role models as they guide us with their motivating, influence to accomplish tasks. There are a lot of leadership styles; when leading, it is based on the situation. When I was in the military, I encountered with many different styles of leadership. A leadership that I considered meaningful is a Transformational Leader. The transformational Leader in the military with their inspiring charisma of motivating, influence creates a visualized path that produces energetic characteristics that inhere to new changes, developments, and possibilities.; by demonstrating authority, the Transformational Leader in the military utilizes their power to inspire and motivate people into trusting and following their example; this as

A strong leader is someone that others can look to as an example and someone they can go to if they need help. A leader needs to hold themselves to a higher standard as well as holding others to that

Communication plays a critical role in leadership at all organization levels. However, effective communication is not an easy task, and any group of people needs to be careful with channels and modes of communication. There are old and new barriers that result in incomplete communication, miscommunication, and broken communication. Any malfunctioning in a conversation resulting from the complexity of communication has severe consequences both at individual and organizational levels.

Leaders are known to be leaders not by their title or by their position; they are called leaders because of the leaders “behaviors and attitudes of their followers where we find the difference between title executives and true leaders”. It is very important to have innovative leader for every organization. Its leader doesn’t only run an organization, but also the supporting followers have their part in it too. My example would be the time when I was just a volunteer for a healthcare organization and it had multiple branches. Just like other health organization, this facility had it’s own executive positions as well, however majority of the daily functions were looked by the director. The director had experience of 15 years of experience as a supervisor and Doctorate in public health, however the director didn’t have any experience as leader. On the meet and greet day, the new director Dr. Grant was introduced to all the staff, and he had his own introduction time where he was able to share his past experience, his inspiration and he also shared that he chose to become leader when saw he had the capability to become one.

Leadership and communication go hand in hand. A successful organization has leaders who know how to communicate. Communication is a vital tool that all leaders have in their tool belt. Communications is key to any organizations. The most successful leaders have developed their communication skills. There are various methods of communications available to a leader and the challenges that are placed on a leader. There are numerous barriers a leader faces in communicating to the various groups in an organization. A successful leader has strong communication skills and can provide the correct information to drive the organization. Communication is defined as “the sharing of information between two or more people to achieve a common understanding about an object or situation” (Hitt, Miller, & Colella, 2011, p. 330). “For a successful manager, communication is an instrument and, at the same time, a state of mind. Studies demonstrate the fact that a successful manager spends about 75-95% of the time talking, listening, writing and citing, thus communicating” (Emanoil, Ramona, & Lucia, 2013, p.75). Good leaders have learned without effective communication throughout the organization, the organization will fail. There are numerous methods to communicate and leaders need to learn to be effective in all methods. Leaders need to understand the communication process, the forms of communications, and use of communication in order to guide the organization to

Good leaders should be good listeners. Leaders should actively and deeply listen to followers and encourage a collaborative and open environment to promote the free exchange of ideas. Most successful leaders believed in utilizing as many minds as possible and engage the followers thought the organizational cycle. In addition, most of the communication breakdowns occur because of not listing effectively. Poor communication is repeatedly cited as major problem in many organizations, whether it is a top-down communication or among different departments and individuals. A leader should have the ability and skills to create an effective communication strategy. During the history many major crises were caused by miss-communication and it cost companies big losses, examples of communication breakdowns were the ones occurred in NASA associated with crash of Space Shuttle Challenger and the loss of the Mars Climate Orbiter (Forster

Communication is a key factor in Leadership organizational behavior. This is important because in order to live up to our mission and envision our vision, you have to be willing to understand and comprehend the value that communication brings. An effective leader should have quality communication, because communication improves the effectiveness of growth from a leader’s perspective. When communicating, as leaders, we want to make sure our team or followers comprehend what we are putting out. The followers are allowed the choice to follow or not to follow.

The organizational leadership drivers have been historically and predominantly filled with male leaders. Determined factors, however fictitious, in writing, as well as perceived by organizational Chief Executive Officers (CEOs), Chief Financial Officers (CFOs), shareholders, Owners, and employees, female leaders were viewed through the stereotypical categories that included limitations. Moreover, gender discriminating society professes the positions for men and women would not be compensated equally. Correlating differences in gender leadership is not as fictional as it may appear. The discovery of a biochemical distinction between the genders may bring some credibility to the historical insights. While men do have higher levels of testosterone and women have higher levels of oxytocin, men and women behaviors are directly affected in speaking up and in connectedness (Moskowitz, 2015). Merit to these perceptions may be in question.