preview

Diversity In Education

Decent Essays

The methodology comprised pre-service teachers attitude toward the inclusion of students with disabilities in the general education classroom, in a three-semester hour course. The details extracted were participants, setting description, instrumentation data collection procedures, study design, and the data analysis procedures used. The study design sought to answer the following research question “How does a one three-semester-hour service-based introductory course in diversity affect pre-service teachers’ attitude toward the inclusion of diverse learners in a general education classroom? The population used for the study were students enrolled in a teacher education program in a multi-faceted United Methodist Church related university located …show more content…

Roughly 12% in the class were African American, 3% other races and 85% Caucasian. (University Fact Book (2010). The main campus is about 340 acres and is slightly more diverse with 28.5% African-American, 2% Hispanic/Latino and 6.5% of other ethnic groups leaving 61% of the students Caucasian. If an inappropriate methodology is used, or if appropriate methodology is used poorly, the results of a study could be misleading. The ORI scale (Opinions Relative to Integration of Students with Disabilities to collect data, e.g., inclusion benefits, behavior management ability to teach students that have a disability and whether special education would be more effective than the general classroom. The design used was a nonrandomized control group quasi-experimental control group using a posttest design. The experimental group was the preservice teacher candidates. The control group participants were randomly selected from surveys of teacher candidates who had not had the diversity course. The researchers chose the posttest because when using scales that are attitudinal, a pretest can cause a pretest to cause the test taker to react to a previous effect tested that earlier that showed no …show more content…

Lucas and Frazier explained the data collected and the results that were relevant. The researchers described the procedures they used and the rationale for doing so. In addition, the use of tables to give values that were exact and did a good job of explaining the tables and figures what to look for in the tables. However, the one thing that I take issue with is where they performed the study. First, let me paraphrase the results of the study. The researchers found that the service, based course in diversity did impact the preservice teacher’s perception of their attitudes toward inclusion because they had a better understanding of the outcomes by integrating the students with disabilities in the general education classroom. The demographic variables collected showed no impact was shown due to the location on the change of attitudes on inclusion of diverse learners. The researchers also acknowledged that one of the limitations of the study was the heavy reliance of self-assessment and this posed a threat to external validity. My only issue with the study is the location, e.g., a rural area. A study by Berry and Gravel (2013) show that teachers were more favorable to inclusion due to the characteristics that were fostered in the rural

Get Access