Essay Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid

Another reason the athletes should receive pay is because, they never really had had financial experience before they enter professional sports. If schools were to begin paying players, they could help the students deal with this situation. This would allow them to be experienced, these students to financial investors who had their best interests in mind. Whether or not these college athletes went on to play professionally, they would at least have some type of financial literacy to carry with them into whatever path they choose. This would set them up a better financial

Do you want to get paid for playing a sport in college? (http://www.experienceproject.com/question-answer.php) College players should receive some payment for playing for their schools. College athletes put their bodies on the line each game they play, paying college athletes would help to begin creating a sense of financial awareness, (https://smartasset.com/retirement/should-student-athletes-be-paid ) and some athletes don't have enough money to pay for food or stuff they need and with the money they have left over they can buy things.

There are positive and negative sides to paying college athletes, but when it comes down to a solution. I think college athletes should not be paid. They do deserve some benefits but paying them is too much. Anyways it would be unfair to other student athletes and non- student athletes. If they do get paid it is going to have a cause and effect domino. It would cut other academic programs, it would cut other sports for some of the smaller colleges. It makes a really big impact on not paying athletes because they are still amateur athletes that are playing for an institution versus playing professional where there are playing for money and not there for education, which these athletes playing for their school they are there for an education

First, No college athletes should not be paid because Not all colleges have enough money to pay their athletes. Some colleges barely have enough money to pay for books and school supplies so if they start paying college athletes some schools will start going out of business and will close down and students From that College will go to another College and the same

Should College Athletes Be Paid? Some people in the NCAA think that players should be payed money for playing a sport that they were offered by the college coach, and I’m here to tell you why I think it’s a bad idea and some sources from people who agree with me. I will also tell you the few good thing about this idea, but in my opinion there’s more bad than good coming out of this.

Paying College athletes has been a trending topic around the National Collegiate Athletic Association over the years. Many have strong opinions about this topic, and the opinions vary. The discussion of paying college athletes began in 1991 when the famed Fab Five became a household name in the United States. The Fab Five is arguably the greatest recruiting class of all time; all attending the same school (Baxter). The Fab Five first created controversy when they started to question why the university and university officials were making millions and millions of dollars off their names, and they were just deprived hungry college kids not making a dime. Nike even made billions by copyrighting their famed black athletic socks, black

For the other side of this argument not paying college athletes lead to palyers working harder to get to the next level of what ever there doing, and maybe players being less competitive because there getting paid. If they do make it to the pros then they will be satisfied of there first real paycheck. Another reason why we should be paying players is that they might stay longer at the school so they can get there full education and bring there school a championship. Also to mature in college and know whats in front of them in there career with older people around them. What if the college doesnt have enough money to pay all of there athletes is another question people are asking.

Your dream has come true; you're at college playing the sport you love, and at what cost? None. You are free to live your college life worry free and have been given the opportunity to continue your sports career. After you have completed your college education you can get a job, with no college loans that you have to pay off. You are also able to start making money right out of graduation. You get to experience this less stressful college life. The lives of athletes that walk-on and athletes not on a scholarship are stressful ones with many different things to worry about. Those athletes have to worry about how to pay for college and the loans they will have to pay back after graduation. They will have to pay for all their meals, books and the cost for dorms. But what got you here? There were many factors, but one that helped you the most was that you were a diverse athlete.

College athletes should be paid because of the hard work, dedication and effort they put into their respective sports. These athletes are a major source of income for their schools and they are not receiving a penny for it. These college athletes deserved to be paid, colleges are using these athletes to get money and they are never given anything but a pat on the back and a good job. College athletes work and train extremely hard to perform at the highest level possible. In most cases, they spend more time training and preparing for their sport than they actually do learning and studying. They put so much on the line to play and they get nothing in return. These college athletes literally make their schools millions of dollars every

A question that has been rising to the surface lately is “should college athletes be paid a salary?” One cannot get on the internet now a day and not see some kind of college sport headline. The world of college sports has been changed greatly the past decade due to college athletes. These athletes make insurmountable amounts of money and an unbelievable amount of recognition for the universities. The athletes that provide and make a ton of revenue for the colleges also spend a huge amount of their time practicing and staying committed to sports, and have to maintain good grades in school which requires quite a bit of overtime. Because college athletes generate massive amounts of revenue and put in massive amounts of personal time for

College sports are a phenomenon that keeps viewers coming back for more. Stated in an article on Money Nation the NCAA makes an estimated $1 billion per year and this number is still growing. What really is insane is that all that money is made off of college athletes, who don’t get a penny from that total number. The debate on whether or not college athletes should be paid has been around for decades and probably will still be here for years to come. Paying college athletes would make the teams unfair, change how hard players will work to get better, affect the amateurism of college sports, and lastly influence the athlete's willingness to participate in college sports.

College athletes generate millions of dollars for their schools each year, yet they are not allowed to be compensated beyond a scholarship due to being considered amateurs. College athletes are some of the hardest working people in the nation, having to focus on both school courses and sports. Because athletics take so much time, these student-athletes are always busy. College football and basketball are multi-billion dollar businesses. The NCAA does not want to pay the athletes beyond scholarships, and it would be tough to work a new compensation program into the NCAA and university budgets. College athletes should be compensated in some form because they put in so much time and effort, generating huge amounts of revenue.

Also, college athletes should not be paid because that is not the purpose for going to college. Many argue that is not he purpose for going to college. Many argue that going to college is not for money but for education (should college...1). They should not be paid because playing a sport is not a job. Students go to college to take classes to later have a career. Also, not all colleges make enough money for all of the athletes to be paid (“Should College...1”). There are a ton of athletes that participate in many sports in college. There are too many athletes at a college for all of them to be paid.

Some of them being that education is money, there would be problems with payment, universities offer more than just an education, the athletic department has its role, and the athletes know the deal. A key point as to why the NCAA would not want to pay athletes is to maintain the amateur status that they uphold today. In the U.S. News and World Report Andrew Zimbalist provides a definition of amateur as “someone who engages in the activity for fun, not remuneration.” The NCAA does not want to change because the perception of college athletes will become completely different. If a college athlete gets paid, then they will no longer be considered amateur athletes and the NCAA will become something that it has never been before. College athletes shouldn’t get paid because almost all of them are lucky enough to be getting their school paid for at the same time. A scholarship is given to a college athlete who is recruited by the school with benefits. It includes free education and board, free meal plans, and free gear. They are given almost everything necessary for college survival, and it is all for free. Student athletes have time to study when they partake in study hall and even have tutors there to help them if they need help on a certain

Young athletes always look up athletes at higher levels. Most of the times they have a favorite athlete and try there hardest to be just like their idol. With that thought college athletes getting paid will send a bad message to younger generations. Seeing these controversies about payment will eventually trickle down. Younger generations will see this as an opportunity for them to get paid as well. If it passes that college athletes become employees why shouldn’t high school athletes get paid, or even junior high athletes. The argument is the amount of money that athletes raise for their schools colleges. According to ESPN in 2008 Alabama made 28,410,419 dollars off of ticket sales alone. ( ) If they base the decision on this fact then many smaller colleges would be in trouble. The larger universities with more money would have an unfair advantage. Most of the skilled athletes would look towards these