Method
Participants
Each researcher in the class interviewed between one to two children within the following age group; 3-5, 8-10 and, 13-15 years old. As a total, there were 33 children involved in the experiment. There were 8 children ages 3-5 interviewed; 4 males and 4 females. There were 15 children ages 8-10 interviewed; 8 males and 7 females. There were 10 children ages 13-15 interviewed; 6 males and 4 females. The participants were selected because the experimenter knew the child they were interviewing. Before interviewing the child, the experimenter asked the parent of the child if it was ok to ask the child some questions for a psychology experiment.
Materials
Items necessary to complete the experiment were a computer to type up the responses from the child being interviewed and a phone to call the intended child if the interview was not conducted face to face.
Procedure
Age groups were assigned based on the people in the class who knew a child within an age group designated by the experiment. From there, the instructor attempted to keep the groups as even as possible so to have even results. Interviews were conducted over the phone or in person. Before the experiment, the prior lab session explained the purpose of the experiment, the procedure, and the interview questions and instructions. The purpose of the experiment was to look at the social cognitive development of children as they grew older by interviewing a child about their friendship. The responses
A total of 59 participants took part in this experiment. They were split into two independent experimental groups, one being the control group, and the other the experimental group. There were 30 participants in the control group, and 29 participants in the experimental group. The male to female ratio was fairly equal with
Social Psychology also focuses on social behaviour, people’s thoughts, feelings friendship and how we interact with other people. A prime example of this is in a study carried out by Brian Bigelow and John La Gaipa [1975] when they carried out a study on children’s friendship. Bigelow and La Gaipa wanted to explore what understanding children had on friendship and how it changed with the children’s age group and of the same sex. Bigelow and La Gaipa began their research by asking a group of children to write an essay in regards to their best friend who had to be of the same sex the children was asked to write what their expectations were from their friend. To enable this research to be conducted Bigelow and La Gaipa completed a list of Twenty
They were 67 participants in study 1 and they were students from the Princeton University subject pool, there was an equal amount of men and women in the study and 1 unknown. Also, 2 of the participants were excluded from the study, 1 because he was already exposed to the experiment material and the other
In the early 1970’s little was known regarding children’s friendships. Bigalow and La Gaipa (1975) assessed developmental differences by having grade school children write 480 essays on what they expected of their best friend that was not expected from other
At one school, the average amount of time that tenth-graders spend watching television each week is 18.4 hours. The principal introduces a campaign to encourage the students to watch less television. One year later, the principal wants to perform a hypothesis test to determine whether the average amount of time spent watching television per week has decreased. Formulate the null and alternative hypotheses for the study described.
Almost all human beings agree that everyone is different and that there is a need to experiment to better understand the differences within the human race. The role of scientific experiments in psychology is an attempt to better understand the mental process of humans and the possible discovery of something in human makeup that has not been noticed by past scientists and psychologists. Experiments can change the permanent thinking of psychologists and scientists. If one psychologist theorized an idea and every other generation agreed with that view, no one voicing an opposition to the idea, then psychologists would get nowhere in understanding the human mind, failing the innate purpose of psychology- to study and answer questions about actions, thoughts, and emotions. Thus, to fulfil the need of psychology, psychologists experiment and refer back to past psychologists for ways to expand.
The study consisted of fifty, female, undergraduate college students. The ethnicities that were use for this study were African American, European, Asian, Hispanic, biracial, and a very slight percentage was categorized as other. The experiment would begin at 5:00pm everyday, for four weeks. One of the three groups was administered each day. The three groups were either peppermint, expectation, or control. Each participant was seated down, given an instruction sheet, a laptop, and was not able to see the other participants from their view.
Alzheimer’s disease causes atrophy to parts of the brain, specifically in brain tissue, as a loss of neurons occurs in most patients.
“I declare that in submitting all work for this assessment I have read, understood and agree to the content and expectations of the assessment declaration”
Each child was exposed to the scenario on their own, this was to stop them being influenced or distracted by others. The first part of the experiment involved bringing a child and the adult model into a room. The child was seated in one corner filled with highly appealing activities such as stickers and stamps. The adult was seated in another corner containing a toy set, a mallet, and an inflatable Bobo doll. Before leaving, the experimenter told the child that the toys in the adult corner were only for the adult.
One hundred thirty-two participants volunteered to take part in the current study. A close inspection of participants’ responses was followed by a deletion of missing data which involved the exclusion of several participants from the statistical analyses if item/question were unanswered. After the exclusion procedure due to incomplete data, the sample size dropped at eighty-seven young adults (10 high school students, 7 college students, 48 undergraduate students, and 22 postgraduate students). The sample comprised 41 males and 46 females, drawn from London population. The inclusion criteria were their age and the current city they were living in (London). They ranged in age from 20 to 30, with a mean age of 25.03 (SD = 3.466). Regrettably, with regard to ethnicity, there was little variation as the majority of the participants classified themselves as White (N = 68), followed by Asian individuals (N = 10), African (N = 6), and Hispanic (N = 3). Participants were selected based on their accessibility, via social networking. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.
The person I interviewed, Christopher, is fourteen years old. He is in the eighth grade in middle school in a rural area of Tennessee. For the interview we went to a local park where we could talk in a more isolated, but comfortable setting. The goal of the interview was to get to know the person being interviewed better and see where they are in relation to Erikson’s Psychosocial Theory of Development and Jean Piaget’s Cognitive Theory. The interview was conducted in a manner that would allow for me to test for hypothetical thinking abilities, internalizing/externalizing tendencies, self-awareness abilities, identity vs. confusion/ psychosocial development, biological growth, cognitive
For this experiment, I will randomly choose 48 children, which I will divide it in two groups of 24 children and in each one will be 12 boys and 12 girls. The experimental group (24 children) will be the one watching the 30 minutes video of Teenage Mutant Ninja for 5 consecutive days while the control group (24 children) will be the one watching a 30 minute video with minimum or if possible no high levels of action. I will choose them from a same demographic area and will conduct a previous survey to the
Prior to commencing their research, Bigelow and La Gaipa and Corsaro needed to decide who the participants would be. They wanted to know what children’s personal views were, so a common factor for both types of research was that those taking part were all children. Bigelow and La Gaipa chose a large sample of children aged 6 to 14 years old (Brownlow, 2012). They all resided in the same city in Canada and came from a similar or identical social group. There were 480 participants all together chosen from eight schools, with thirty girls and thirty boys from each. The age-range was a significant factor to them because they wanted to study how children understood friendship at different ages and stages of their life. Using such a large number of children in their study meant that they could make generalisations about children’s friendships and how they develop over time. This data could then be applied to children as a whole. Corsaro chose his participants differently. The children that took part in his studies were about three years old (Brownlow, 2012). In addition, unlike Bigelow and La Gaipa, Corasro did not limit his research to one city, or even one country. He wanted to know what friendship meant for children at different times and in different places. Therefore, Corsaro studied children in different countries including, the United States and Italy (Interview with William Corsaro, 2010). By
I will be doing an experiment to investigate whether it is true or not that children's shoes sizes really increase as they get older. In order for me to prove this, I need to collect some data and to start with, I have to create a simple and short questionnaire and I will ask some of my friends and family who has children and could help me with this experiment by completing the questionnaire. My objective is to find out at the end of this investigation whether my experiment on children's shoe sizes is true or not true.