The federal government shouldn’t telling us how to live our lives. The government is prohibiting us to text and drive, talk and drive, smoke around children. We as citizens need to learn to resolve these matters with guidelines not demands. We will never grow as a society if the government continues to put restrictions on our every movement. If one person makes an error and all of sudden there is law to make sure their error never happens again, we will have so many laws we will become puppets to the government. The way the laws are influencing our lives may cause this domino effect.
On a yearly basis 18 million dollars are spent on school lunches for schools all over America. And taxpayers, are the ones paying for part of that. Government is trying to get the United States to eat healthier, but in the end money is being wasted and people are not happy about it. Overall the government should not be regulating what we eat.
Regulation of the internet restricts these rights by allowing us to only access the things the government finds acceptable. The first amendment to the United States Constitution says that “Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech.” As citizens, we have the freedom of speech. Sometimes that freedom is taken to the extreme, especially in the case of the internet. If the government regulates what is displayed on the web and who can access things, is that not taking away out rights? We are protected in the constitution, and regulating the internet is not only taking away our freedom of expression or speech, but also out privacy. Some argue that the government regulating the internet is like securing the internet and keeping us safe, but on other’s stand point, they are also keeping things away from us that we could normally access through the
In recent times, the government has slowly been changing from a limited to a more unlimited government, allowing them to interfere into our daily life and passing laws that go against our basic individual rights, which is not what the Founders of our government originally stated in the constitution. This can be best show through during Roosevelt presidency, when Roosevelt deliberately tried to manipulate the judicial branch in his favor, leading to the famous scandal, the Packing of the Court. During the 1930s, the people looked
After Fast Food Nation by Eric Schlosser was published in 2001 and became a New York Times bestseller, the same titled movie and other food-related documentary movies such as “Super Size Me” (2004) and “Food Inc.” (2009) became smash hits, which may reflect the enhancement of people’s awareness of healthy food in last decade. However, the recent article of Time magazine online shows that today’s food situation does not seem to improve since then, it even got worse. Especially a social problem like a relation between child obesity and fast food draws more people’s attention and some kinds of legislation by the federal government is said to be required to stop the situation get worse (Melnick). There is something should be done by the
The government is to be considered the power of the United States. All of its actions are undisputed correct or at least they force Americans to believe that. Many times in history the government was afraid that citizens may spoil their good image and consequently limited their speech. This was seen in the year 1918 as the Alien and Sedition Act was passed. The government was afraid and did not
The government restricts our rights to better protect American citizens. They took away our free speech and freedom of the press, legal rights, and our privacy. When they do this the law is usually undone later. They do this to protect us but the end up going too far.
We now have law regulating everything. We are forced to wear seat belts, we have to wear motorcycle helmets, kids have to ride in the back seat, smokers can't even smoke outside, the government wants to regulate abortion, religion, sex, child discipline, marriage, and free speech. They want to control what you can post on the web, what your kids wear to school, where you can walk across the street, what you can say at the office, where you can pray, where you can get high, who you have sex with, what kind of sex you have, what jokes you can tell, and when you can spank your children.
There are several people amongst the cataclysm we call the United States of America, and there have been many in the past that have been very influential in our government and how it should be ran, such as our founding fathers. One man, Alexander Hamilton was a very influential man in the beginnings of our nation and its principles. One of his quotes, "Why has government been instituted at all? Because the passions of man will not conform to the dictates of reason and justice without constraint." This quote really explains how I feel the government is participating in the role of our nation. The government is simple there to guide and protect, as well as maintain order, along with being the strong hold of the nation, almost like the big
In today’s society the government has most of the control on what we say and what we do. Some will argue and say that this is wrong and we get the say but they don’t realize the different things the government is taking away. Our society is getting more like the book “Brave New World” where the government has the most power. The government will do anything to get a little bit of money in their hands.
The government is in our throats. People are forced to watch discrimination and negligence all around the country. Well, at least it seems like that. The government does some wrong things against individuals, or they carry out projects that sometimes only hurt communities. Either way, our government is not perfect as it is deemed to be. It is not right to intentionally break the law, not at all. But, it is appropriate to go against the government, in certain situations.
I agree with your statement lately other countries have not agreed with our federal government. There is a great division and many unresolved issues in our nation. However, the more I read on how our government is set up the better I understand. The United States is a system set up with Congress the national government, state, local and our clauses. The central government is checked by the separation of its powers among legislative, executive and judicial branches. This is our checks and balances between central government state and local.
We live in this country for the land, and the for the free as Americans we rely on many attributes in this world in order for us to live our lives. Our government has supplied us with many great things for us to be proud of. Our government is “the institutions and processes though which public policies are made for society.” (Edwards, Wattenberg, and Lineberry, p. 7). With all these institutions which includes the President, Congress, the courts and all the federal administrative agencies. These are the institutions that make up public policies for us, and to shape the way we live as Americans. The way this system has been operating through all the years has been
Laws such as the recent proposal by New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg is trying to ban a variety of sugary drinks in the city’s food establishments (“America’s ‘Nanny State’ laws”). This specific law interferes greatly with one’s personal choice. People begin questioning id the government is going too far and becoming too overprotective. Laws like this one and for instance not being allowed to drive in public with a “muddy car” take away from freedoms given to the people. All these laws are making people feel controlled in a “free” environment. These restraining laws lead many to believe that, “politicians and bureaucrats know more about how to live your life, manage your health, and raise your kids than you do” (The Nanny State). I believe an assortment of laws are pointless and unneeded because people should be allowed to make their choice if they want to abide by the, which are now laws, rules that they are being forced to
How could we be promised the limitation of government, yet have government surpass those limitations? Throughout history, going all the way back to the colonial era, we see attempts of self-governance, and a continually demonstrated willpower to limit government’s rule for the good of the people and our nation. Influential philosophers, such as Baron De Montesquieu and John Locke, encouraged individuals to fight for individuality and influenced the basis of what makes the Bill of Rights what it is today. The Bill of Rights forms the base of America’s foundation as a nation of equality, a justification as to why America was created, and a shining example for fledgling nations as to what can be achieved in democracy. Unfortunately, nearly every
On the contrary, sometimes the government does get a little too involved. One can discuss seat belt laws and even wearing a helmet when on any bike. Many states enforce cyclists to wear a helmet when riding a bicycle. One can argue that wearing or not wearing a helmet does not affect any other individual, but themselves. States use this as an easy revenue for a state or town, to get money from individuals. The fact is states force the wearing of a helmet on a motorcycle as well. If an individual is going above 40 MPH, they have a 50 percent chance of surviving a motorcycle accident with a helmet, and the surviving rate decline with ever 10 percent when going higher in speed. States say they have individuals’ welfare in mind, be really this