Fayol's Management Principles

Henri Fayol, at the age of 19, began working as engineer at a large mining company in France which eventually led to him becoming a director. Through the years that led on to this Fayol then developed his 14 principles of management which he considered to be the most important. According to Fayol, these principles indicate how managers should organise and interact with their peers. Fayol’s analysis is considered to be one of the earliest theories of management that has been created and therefore

His 14 universal principles of management, listed in Table 1.1, were intended to show managers how to carry out their functional duties. Fayol’s functions and principles have withstood the test of time because of their widespread applicability. In spite of years of reformulation, rewording, expansion, and revision, Fayol’s original management functions still can be found in nearly all management texts. In fact, after an extensive review of studies of managerial work, a pair of management scholars

Henri Fayol, was a French mining engineer by trade for a company called Commentry-Fourchamboult-Decazeville, before becoming a managing director at the same firm. He wrote a short publication ‘General and Industrial Management’ – which was translated by Constance Storrs and printed in 1949. Within this publication, Fayol laid out a rational outlook as to what management is; which entailed 5 fundamentals: to forecast and plan – to come up with a “plan of action”; to organise – arranging a task; to command – directing those involved with the

The administrative management viewpoint evolved early in the 1900s and is most closely identified with Henri Fayol (1841-1925), a French industrialist. Fayol’s work, “Administration industrielle et générale (1916)”, later translated into the 1949 “General and industrial administration”, is one of the first and most widely quoted analyses on management. As a result, Fayol influenced many writers, most notably Urwick. Although, there have been many theories supporting Fayol’s ideas, but there have been many writers who have directly opposed Fayol, the most prominent one being Henry Mintzberg, who in his “The Nature of Managerial Work (1973)” regarded Fayol’s ideas as “folklore”. The aim of this essay is to evaluate the works of both Fayol and Mintzberg, discussing the pros and cons of both the theories. Moreover, the essay will depict that how Fayol has been able to withstand “the test of time” and prove that his theory cannot be termed as “folklore”.

In 1888, a French man named Henri Fayol was a director of a mining company that was going out of business when he changed the company and made it profitable once again (Carpenter, Bauer, Erdogan, 2010, p. 68). Fayol realized that what he had discovered helped him to save his company, so he decided, after retiring, to share his knowledge and tools with other companies if they wanted to also be successful (Carpenter, Bauer, Erdogan, 2010, p. 68). He believed that people did not have the guidelines for proper management, since he had the knowledge he put together what is now known as Fayol’s fourteen principles of management (Yoo, Lemak, Choi, 2006, p. 353). Fayol saw a problem that he could potentially fix, and with that the foundation of proper management skills was

Critically, an early pioneer of this managerial structure within organisations was Henri Fayol. Fayol devised a ‘common sense’ view of the managerial responsibilities

Management encompasses four principle elements; to plan, organize, lead, and control the limited resources of an organization, to achieve the stated goals.

Henri Fayol’s theory was almost a century old and was originally written in French. Further review on several journal articles has led to an overview background of Fayol’s working life which provided the foundation that conceptualized his theory. According to Wren (2001), Fayol was appointed as the Director in a mining company, Decazeville, where he succeeded to turnaround the company to become profitable. Fayol was the first person to classify the functions of a manager’s job. Fayol (1949; as cited in Wren, 2001) identified five key functions in managerial works.as planning, organising, command, coordination and control. Planning consists of any managerial work that involves setting goals and coordinating actions to

There are four functions of management: planning, organizing, leading and controlling. The four basic principles of management found in all businesses and corporations. Management is a process designed to achieve an organization's objectives by using its resources effectively and efficiently in a changing environment.

It is my aim within this essay to introduce, define, and theoretically explain the management principle that is organising. Paramount to explaining organising it is important to understand the characteristics that are often used to describe management such as: goal orientation, decision-maker, activity integration, and connective processes. Each characteristic represents an important managerial concept; take for example goal orientation, which is the primary task of utilising resources, knowledge, and time to achieve expected results. Synonymous to achieving results management requires a decision-maker, in addition to activity integration. A decision-maker will oversee various departments, like marketing, production, finance, and human resources (HR), whilst activity integration will connect these departments to work cohesively together. This integration completes connective processes resembling five steps: planning, organising, staffing, directing and controlling (Chaganti and Sambharya, 1987). From an abstract perspective the management process will always start with planning and end with controlling, however to cohesively develop management, organising becomes a fundamental tool (Hawes and Thanopoulos, 1989).

One of the major problems facing secondary school administration in Nigeria has been the absence of appropriate and efficient guidelines for effective management. Some of the administrative management strategies have been based on a variety factors. While some have be based on set goals with no adequate information, others have been characterized by a high level of ignorance of administrative processes on the part of the administrators. The falling standard in education in the country is partly attributable to this poor administration of the secondary schools due to lack of specialized personnel with in-depth administrative strategies. This study is therefore aimed at addressing the deficiencies in the administrative process in the secondary schools through the application of the Henri Fayol’s managerial principles in the management of the secondary schools. A structured questionnaire was designed with the fourteen principles on which the opinion of the secondary schools stakeholders (Principals, Teachers, PTA and Educational Inspectors) was solicited. The tested instrument was then administered to a total of 3732 respondents selected through a stratified random sampling procedure across the six geopolitical

The paper will explore different theories of Management, include Henri Fayol and Henry Mintzberg. This section of this paper provides an overview of functions, roles and skills required of a manager. What is Management? Management can define as the process of reaching organisational goals by working with and through people and other organisational resources. (Management Innovation, 2008).

Early management theories adopted by such proponents as Henri Fayol, Mary Parker Follett and Max Weber are relevant in todays’ world. In this essay I am going to discuss about all three theorists and how their theories are still relevant for managers in the 21st century in meeting the challenges. In the classical approach to management there are three branches under it. They are, scientific management, administrative principles and bureaucratic organisation. Henry Fayol and Mary Parker Follett developed theories for administrative principles and Max Weber developed a theory for bureaucratic organisation (Schermerhorn et al. 2014, p.36). First we will be going through Henri Fayol and then Mary Parker Follett as they both made theories

Henri Fayol (1841-1925), was ‘’famous for the classical school of management, which emphasises command and control’’. (Robinson, 2005) He is deemed to be one of the founders of general management; also referred to as the administrative theory and later on becoming known as ‘Fayolism’.

In this essay, I will analyse and compare the traditional models of Fayol and Barnard together with the more contemporary model of McGregor. The theories will be linked with my personal working experience by which I will demonstrate their relevance and role in practice. The essay will try to critically analyse and explain the differences between the three models and their applicability in today’s modern business environment. At the end, I will give my perspective of what management might mean for contemporary business organisations.