The researched proposal by Manasi Deshpande entitled “A Call to Improve Campus Accessibility for the Mobility Impaired,” is a reasonable argument, by this student, to improve campus accessibility at the University of Texas. I believe this student supports her argument very well by using interviews and campus observations. The proposal emphasizes the challenges students with mobility impairments encounter while attending classes on campus. Ms. Deshpande includes her personal experiences, as well as the experiences of fellow students as supporting evidence. Frankly, it was a bit shocking to learn this student changed her major due to accessibility issues. This fact alone should be a strong argument for change. The proposal details the benefits for improving campus accessibility not only for students, but also faculty. Moreover, Ms. Deshpande adds to her argument by including statistics regarding the …show more content…
For instance, Ms. Deshpande argues that better campus accessibility would increase the University’s recruitment of disabled individuals. The section of the paper entitled “Counterargument” focuses on the cost related to improving campus accessibility, but includes evidence to contradict that cost prevents campus authorities from making this matter a higher priority. Moreover, the student reminds the University regarding their legal obligations for making these changes. I believe that including a federal law as evidence to justify her proposal is the author’s most persuasive argument. Her field work identifies that only nineteen of the one-hundred-fifty campus buildings fully comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Deshpande (2010), states in her proposal that there is ‘no legal deadline to make the entire campus accessible.” Sadly, the Americans with Disabilities Act supporting her argument is flawed, allowing campus authorities to drag their
These changes can and will affect everyone on campus. A more accessible campus would mostly just affect those with disabilities. We also have the power of words which can make everyone more aware of this disability. Once someone is more aware of something that they do not understand, they understand how to handle being in a situation where they must deal with this. In conclusion, if everyone was more aware of quadriplegics, and they understood that we are no different, we would feel less alone. People wouldn’t be afraid to talk to us and they wouldn’t treat us different than everybody
The right of entry to education resources is more than uncomplicated admission to a college. The right to use means to provide students with the devices they will need to be victorious in higher learning. Students with a recognized disability ought to be no omission. In reality, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, “ensure that all qualified persons have equal access to education regardless of the presence of any disability.” Objective replacement, class waivers, and revision of classroom management, testing and course necessities are all illustrations of behavior to supply access for the learner with a disability. A break down to the creation of such practical adjustments can place schools in breach of federal and state statutes, ensuing expensive fines.
Unspeakable Conversations by Harriet McBryde Johnson is an article about her experience visiting Princeton University to exchange views and challenge Peter Singer, a professor who strongly believes that all disabled people, like herself, are “better off” not been born at all. The article provides an insight into Johnson’s life as a disabled person. She takes the readers on a journey that explores both sides of her own and Singer’s contrasting beliefs. She protests the prevalent stigma and prejudice of disabled people and gives voice to this marginalized community. Johnson challenges stereotypes of disability, uses her a personal experience to better understand the world and help others, and attempts to directly address oppression by arguing against Professor Singer’s theory and assemble a group of diverse and like-minded people for social change.
In the case study “Limited Access” about Kanisha, a college student who is paralyzed from the waist down. Furthermore, she is having problems finding appropriate parking and is looking annexed, tried and depressed; one of her professors has made insensitive/prejudice remarks about her wheelchair in his classroom. We will look at specific statements in the NASW Code of Ethics that address these issues as it relates to this case study such as discriminating against people with physical disabilities, service and social justice.
To accommodate and attract travelers with disabilities, how can companies provide better training to all levels of personnel and invest, without causing financial hardship, in accessibility projects?
In terms of a solution, I am proposing a two-part solution in order to rectify some of the issues listed above. The first part of this solution is the creation of the Boise State Disability Advocacy Alliance (BSDAA). I propose the creation of the student run organization be comprised of students with and without disabilities. The BSDAA would then meet regularly throughout the academic year and then at least two to three times a year meet with the Boise State University administration to discuss issues of resources, awareness, and ease of accessibility on Boise State campus.
This study aims to establish a dormitory for the persons with disabilities (PWD’s) studying in Trinity University of Asia. The study will be based on the needs of the PWD’s students. It is focused on reducing burden of the PWD students coming to school.
The proposal by Manasi Deshpande entitled “A Call to Improve Campus Accessibility for the Mobility Impaired,” is a reasonable argument by this student regarding the need for improved campus accessibility. In summary, the introduction of this proposal emphasizes the challenges students with mobility impairments must face while attending classes on campus at the University of Texas at Austin. Ms. Deshpande includes quotes from her research field notes to support her argument in the next section of the proposal. Next, the proposal details the benefits for improving campus accessibility not only for students, but faculty as well. The student strengthens her argument by including statistics regarding the number of students that suffer temporary
Providing tools to help employees with disabilities- Putting in physical, technological and attitudinal accessibility will help business increase productivity among workers with disabilities, and Improve and expand its customer base to people with disabilities by eliminating barriers that may prevent or deter them from accessing the services and products
Currently, here at TCNJ, when I would walk down the stairs, grab lunch, or even go to class, I would see visually impaired people walking as if they were just like us. I remember a time when I was on line to grab dinner, and a young woman, who was visually impaired, stood in the middle of the cafeteria because she was lost. Due to the fact that I just arrived on campus, I did not have a clear sense of direction, therefore, I could not assist her. However, another young woman decided to help her. "I could do it!" was the phrase that I overheard the visually impaired young woman say. Not only was she made felt as if she was not capable of performing such task, but as if she did not fit
Many of the limitations to our assessment can be attributed to our own circumstances as individuals without impairments, as we cannot accurately represent the needs or personal requirements that every unique individual. Reviewing the physical measurements of doorways, benches and walkways was an eye-opening experience, allowing us to comprehend the environmental barriers that individuals with impairments are forced to maneuver around in order to participate in physical activity and exercise. Our understanding of what was accessible was altered through this project, and we have found a greater appreciation for facilities that endeavor to fulfill the accessibility needs of their clients. It was interesting to note that many of the questions in the AIMFREE questionnaire are subjective to the individuals conducting the assessment. The Jamie Platz YMCA did provide many of the facilitators recommended; for example there is a new wheelchair accessible ergometer machine in the fitness centre, and attempts to resolve any issues or requests their members may have. Chin explained to us that the facility has made structural changes in the past to meet the needs of clients; however these renovations are not always fiscally possible. A similar study to our own documented the barriers and added costs that facilities encounter when trying to improve their accessibility
Good (2007) tells us how we can make students with disability “invisible” when there needs are not catered for, therefore the are not able to engage with their surroundings. It could be argued that student union tends to make students with disability “invisible”. With this in mind they should develop a greater awareness to students with different disabilities. This could be done by sought of creating a more welcoming atmosphere by providing spaces which are comfortable for students with disabilities communicate and interact freely without barriers such as loud noise, Madriaga et al
When considering accessibility, one can also compare the building with legislative policies pertaining to disability and
They completed a survey of students with and without disabilities enrolled in classes at a midsized Historically Black College or University on the East Coast. (Stewart, Mallery & Choi, 2010, p.29). They used a purposive non-random sample of students from the Fall 2006 and Spring 2007 semester. They started with three thousand and seventy-eight undergraduate and graduate students to answer the study questions. The sample included one hundred
In line with this suggestion, N.A. Lukianova directed a project in autumn 2016, at TPU whereby a team of students studying "Industrial Design" completed a portfolio consisting of the results of monitoring and assessment of the level of accessibility of the architectural environment on campus for students with disabilities. The portfolio included an interactive map of the campus.