preview

Film Analysis: The Thin Blue Line

Decent Essays

The thin blue line is a late 70s documentary that analyzes the murder case of the officer Robert Wood. The two prime suspects are Randall dale Adams that was found guilty and David Harris. As we can see in this documentary Errol Morris is trying to prove Randall Adams innocence by showing us persuasive evidence. The evidence that I found more persuasive were Randall Adams’s timeline, the stolen car and murder weapon, the milkshake found on the side of the road and Davis Harris background history.
In my opinion, Randall Adams timeline was the most persuasive evidence because it shows us that he is a trustworthy person. On the other hand, Errol Morris shows us that David Harris timeline didn’t match persuading us to believe that he was hiding something. Randall Adams claimed that he first meet David Harris when he was walking on the road because his car …show more content…

After that, they when to a drive-in theater but they left early and Adams when back to the motel. Since the beginning of the documentary Randall Adams is clearly saying the truth because the time when they left the theater and when back home matches perfectly. To make his story more credible, Randal Adams gave specific details such as that they were smoking marijuana and drinking in the car and the name of the show he was watching when he was at the motel. Another piece of evidence that I found persuasive was the stolen car and the murder weapon. When David Harris and Randall Adams meet for the first time, Harris never said the car was stolen and he also lied about his age. A reckless 16-year-old kid driving a stolen car in the night shows us that he was capable of committing crimes and it wasn’t his first time doing so.

Get Access