Free Trade vs Protectionism Essay

3022 Words13 Pages
Content page pages Question one 1.1 identify all stakeholders 2 1.2 Unitarian perspective 3 1.3 Maxim of duties 1.4 clashes of rights 4 1.5 an alternative ethical approach Question two * introduction 5 * corporate social responsibility * definition of corporate social responsibility * Company profile * RBS social policy…show more content…
This case obviously targets a utilitarian perspective. Such an analysis focus on harms and benefits induced by a certain decision. In this case, the decision is to whether to change the banking regulation system from risky bonus driven system to conservative more regulated institution. A Possible list could look like the following: Stakeholders and what they want | harm | Benefit | Banks-they want to have access to their retail operations financed their more riskier investment operation | This reform will effectively remove the implicit state guarantee standing behind investment banks will increase their cost of borrowing. | A good banking system is one that is useful and secure; as well as economically, socially and environmentally fit for purpose. | Government in the UK.-The government wants to find a solution for the banks, because currently regulation can't prevent future banking failure. | Bank bosses are suggesting the split could wipe 0.3% of gross domestic product at a time when economic growth looks increasingly fragile. | This reform will make it easier for government and less costly to resolve banks that get into trouble. | Businesses-availability of low interest short-term and long-term loans. | The banking reforms will make banks expensive for individuals and small businesses to use banking facilities. Because banks will allocate the expenses incurred to the end customer.

More about Free Trade vs Protectionism Essay

Open Document