At the end of our experiment, we were able to calculate the error percentage with the actual calculations. We were also able to compare the Punnett squares too. Some of the actual calculations were quite different than the expected, while others were spot on. One example is with normal wings, yellow body, our actual was two thousand two hundred and eighty-four flies and so was our expected. Whether the results were spot on or completely different we still had results to compare to the expected amount of each type of fly. When we started the project one of our main points was to figure out if we were close to the result that we had collected. In general, we stayed in a range from being fifteen to fifty flies off. In my opinion, this was surprising because I thought that we were going to have a much larger gap of too many flies or too little flies. Also, by having all nine classes, adding up their data I thought we were going to be much further off than it turned out to be. Since the data was off by fifteen to fifty flies, I think that one thing that could have affected this was what flies decided to have offspring and which ones decided to not pair up. It all depends on the combination of the flies to get the …show more content…
First is the law of dominance, this is when one trait is dominant over the other, that other trait is the recessive trait. An example is, when you have an ebony body one parent may be yellow while the other may be ebony. In this case, the yellow body parent was recessive in the offspring. The second law is the law of random fertilisation. This is when any fly can mate with any fly, an example is a normal fly can mate with a normal or apterous fly with normal fly. This occurred in our lab because all of our types of flies were in the one container and they decided which flies wanted to mate with each
The experiment was performed on February 2nd 2016 at the University of Calgary in a Biological Science laboratory. The experimental procedure was done in a group of four students.
Another way the lab was inaccurate is because the throwing aspect wasn’t the controlled variable. That being said we couldn’t rely on the fact that one is more fit than the other. Just because one flies further than the other doesn’t mean that it is more fit. That being said, if the bird flew the furthest without actually being that fit in the real world, it could mess up our data.
It is possible that the temperature at which the flies were kept dropped significantly below 20 degrees Celsius; this could have caused the death of some of the files or slowed down their growth and reproduction rate. This would result in there being fewer flies. This problem could be overcome in further experiments by using a larger heating device with a more responsive thermostat to keep the Fly house within the recommended temperature range for D. melanogaster.
This Punnet Square represents the F1 offspring breeding with each other to create more offspring. This second set of offspring is the F2 generation. If both parents are heterozygous dominant, then the offspring expected would be: 50% heterozygous dominant, 25% homozygous dominant and 25% homozygous recessive.
Introduction: The intention of this lab was to gain a better understanding of Mendelian genetics and inheritance patterns of the drosophila fruit fly. This was tasked through inspecting phenotypes present in the dihybrid crosses performed on the flies. An experimental virtual fly lab assignment was also used to analyze the inheritance patterns. Specifically, the purpose of our drosophila crosses is to establish which phenotypes are dominant/recessive, if the traits are inherited through autosome or sex chromosomes and whether independent assortment or linkage is responsible for the expressed traits.
You can collect individual flies that you have generated (for use in future experiments) by dragging them
For the dark environment we cut out a sheet of black paper and taped it to the top of the observation chamber, for the light environment two flashlights were above the chamber. A funnel was used to put the bugs in the middle and keep them there until the timer was started. After thirty seconds when the pill bugs were released our group counted how many bugs were either in the neutral, dark, or light section of the observation chamber this is how the data was collected. This experiment had two trials, so the data, that was collected during both trials were averaged out. During the second experiment that was conducted the pill bugs were once again placed in the middle of the observation chamber with the funnel, but this time one section of the chamber had soil with three drops of water, while the other section of the chamber had soil with 3 drops of vinegar. Once thirty seconds had past after the bugs had been released each member of the group counted how many bugs were on each sections of the chamber. This experiment was done twice and then the data was averaged out the data. This method of collecting data was chosen because this was the simplest and most efficient way of collecting
Introduction: Drosophila is the name given to a genus of small flies within the family, Drosophilidae. They are commonly referred to as fruit flies or pomace flies. They have historically been called vinegar or wine flies due to the fact that they commonly gather around rotting fruit. The fruit fly is sometimes mistaken for the Tephritidae family of flies which is closely related and is even sometimes referred to as the true fruit fly however; tephritids tend to only feed on unripe fruit, and have been regarded as destructive agricultural pests. For instance, the Mediterranean fruit fly has devastated the agricultural economy sector of several Mediterranean countries millions of dollars in ruined crops.
We began the experiment by dividing into pairs and selecting one mutation of flies. Claire and I started off with Vestigial Flies. We then got our supplies; three clean tubes, three caps, three sponges, fly nap and wand, dissecting microscope, paintbrush, and three small plastic plates (for separation). As a team, Claire began to tap the container containing the mutant flies (this way they stayed at the bottom), while I had my extra sponge and clean tub ready to stick on top of hers’. After counting down to three, she pulled the sponge on her fly container and I quickly placed the empty vial on top. I then flipped the vials upside down and proceeded to knock as many to the empty vial as I could. We did the exact same step as before, counted
we said goodbye and placed them in the fly morgue. We allowed the F2 larval
The Tallahassee Democrat News, a site that is part of the USA Today Network, reports current news on scientific advancements. The article, Fruit Flies Yield Clues On Cancerous Tumor Hotspots, offers an overview of the research done by Yoichiro Tamori, Wu-Min Deng, and Emiko Suzuki, who have discovered that epithelial tissues in fruit flies can be cancerous. The reasoning behind studying fruit flies is because, “Flies and humans have a lot in common in terms of genes and pathways for developing cancer” (Haughney). In the article, the researchers explain that the tumor hot spots, which appear to be near the epithelial tissues, found in fruit flies have also been found in several human cancers, “These tumor hotspots all involved an oncogenic signaling pathway that have been shown to play a part in many types of human cancers” (Haughney). However, the scientists do assure the reader that in distinct areas of the epithelial tissue there are tumor cold spots. Without a doubt, this is the beginning of a prolonged experiment, “The more we know, the better we can get at treating and preventing cancer” (Haughney).
Some larva containing vials had hatched into flies. Counting of the flies began at this point. As flies started to grow, at different rates for each vial, with in the first seven days after all larva had hatched the flies were counted. The procedure was done according to theDrosophila manual (45-2620)
After having emerged from the pupae, the flies cease to grow; small flies are not
Which glider, small or large, gave you a smaller % difference? What factors contributed to the error in the experiment?
Ho: There is not a significance difference between the alive number of balls collected on high vs. low resource abundance.